+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An acoustic study of vowel intrusion in Turkish onset clusters

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          Studies in Articulatory Phonology ( Browman & Goldstein, 1993) have established that what sounds like insertion of a segment can be a side effect of gestural timing relations. Based on acoustic evidence from a production experiment with six Turkish speakers, I argue that such gestural timing produces non-lexical vowels in complex onsets in Turkish—previously described as harmonizing epenthetic vowels ( Clements & Sezer, 1982, inter alia). Non-lexical vowels occurred in 88.3% of tokens, and usually resembled [ɯ], failing to undergo vowel harmony. Non-lexical vowels are shorter than underlying vowels, and their F1 and F2 values are more affected by the following vowel, suggesting they are more subject to vowel-to-vowel coarticulation. These results support the hypothesis that the inserted acoustic vowels are targetless, created by timing relations between gestures, with the implication that Turkish phonology does not categorically ban complex onsets.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The relationship between the perception of non-native phonotactics and loanword adaptation

           Lisa Davidson (2007)
          This study examines how phonetic details produced by non-bilingual borrowers (‘disseminators’) are categorised when new words are transmitted to the monolinguals of the borrowing language community (‘recipients’). The stimuli are based on research showing that the schwa inserted by English speakers into non-native clusters (e.g. /zgmo/→[z gmo]) differs acoustically from lexical schwa (e.g. [zgmo]). In , listeners transcribed Cluster (CC), Lexical (CC) and Transitional (C C) stimuli produced by an English speaker. Transcriptions of C C stimuli were split between CC and CVC, and participants wrote C C with a vowel less often than they did CC. demonstrated that listeners had difficulty discriminating between C C and both CC and CC. These findings suggest that C C is acoustically intermediate between clusters and schwas; thus recipients may assign C C token to either of the phonotactic categories CC or CC. The ramifications of these findings for loanwords and the acquisition of phonological contrast are discussed.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Perceptual similarity in input–output mappings: A computational/experimental study of non-native speech production

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Sources of illusion in consonant cluster perception


                Author and article information

                Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology
                Ubiquity Press
                09 October 2018
                : 9
                : 1
                [1 ]Department of Linguistics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, US
                Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See

                Journal article


                Comment on this article