3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Assessing gender bias in machine translation: a case study with Google Translate

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Conference Proceedings: not found

          Moses

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Google’s Multilingual Neural Machine Translation System: Enabling Zero-Shot Translation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Deep neural networks are more accurate than humans at detecting sexual orientation from facial images.

              We show that faces contain much more information about sexual orientation than can be perceived or interpreted by the human brain. We used deep neural networks to extract features from 35,326 facial images. These features were entered into a logistic regression aimed at classifying sexual orientation. Given a single facial image, a classifier could correctly distinguish between gay and heterosexual men in 81% of cases, and in 71% of cases for women. Human judges achieved much lower accuracy: 61% for men and 54% for women. The accuracy of the algorithm increased to 91% and 83%, respectively, given five facial images per person. Facial features employed by the classifier included both fixed (e.g., nose shape) and transient facial features (e.g., grooming style). Consistent with the prenatal hormone theory of sexual orientation, gay men and women tended to have gender-atypical facial morphology, expression, and grooming styles. Prediction models aimed at gender alone allowed for detecting gay males with 57% accuracy and gay females with 58% accuracy. Those findings advance our understanding of the origins of sexual orientation and the limits of human perception. Additionally, given that companies and governments are increasingly using computer vision algorithms to detect people's intimate traits, our findings expose a threat to the privacy and safety of gay men and women. (PsycINFO Database Record
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Neural Computing and Applications
                Neural Comput & Applic
                Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                0941-0643
                1433-3058
                March 27 2019
                Article
                10.1007/s00521-019-04144-6
                d6795bef-c315-4eb5-ae21-a2bee3bc9ea8
                © 2019

                http://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article