22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Texas Senate Bill 8 significantly reduced travel to abortion clinics in Texas

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Dobbs v. Jackson decision by the United States Supreme Court has rescinded the constitutional guarantee of abortion across the United States. As a result, at least 13 states have banned abortion access with unknown effects. Using “Texas” SB8 law that similarly restricted abortions in Texas, we provide insight into how individuals respond to these restrictions using aggregated and anonymized human mobility data. We find that “Texas” SB 8 law reduced mobility near abortion clinics in Texas by people who live in Texas and those who live outside the state. We also find that mobility from Texas to abortion clinics in other states increased, with notable increases in Missouri and Arkansas, two states that subsequently enacted post-Dobbs bans. These results highlight the importance of out-of-state abortion services for women living in highly restrictive states.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Association of Mobile Phone Location Data Indications of Travel and Stay-at-Home Mandates With COVID-19 Infection Rates in the US

            Key Points Question Did human mobility patterns change during stay-at-home orders and were the mobility changes associated with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) curve? Findings This cross-sectional study using anonymous location data from more than 45 million mobile phones found that median travel distance decreased and stay-at-home time increased across the nation, although there was geographic variation. State-specific empirical doubling time of total COVID-19 cases increased (ie, the spread reduced) significantly after stay-at-home orders were put in place. Meaning These findings suggest that stay-at-home social distancing mandates were associated with the reduced spread of COVID-19 when they were followed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Socioeconomic Outcomes of Women Who Receive and Women Who Are Denied Wanted Abortions in the United States

              Objectives. To determine the socioeconomic consequences of receipt versus denial of abortion. Methods. Women who presented for abortion just before or after the gestational age limit of 30 abortion facilities across the United States between 2008 and 2010 were recruited and followed for 5 years via semiannual telephone interviews. Using mixed effects models, we evaluated socioeconomic outcomes for 813 women by receipt or denial of abortion care. Results. In analyses that adjusted for the few baseline differences, women denied abortions who gave birth had higher odds of poverty 6 months after denial (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 3.77; P  < .001) than did women who received abortions; women denied abortions were also more likely to be in poverty for 4 years after denial of abortion. Six months after denial of abortion, women were less likely to be employed full time (AOR = 0.37; P  = .001) and were more likely to receive public assistance (AOR = 6.26; P  < .001) than were women who obtained abortions, differences that remained significant for 4 years. Conclusions. Women denied an abortion were more likely than were women who received an abortion to experience economic hardship and insecurity lasting years. Laws that restrict access to abortion may result in worsened economic outcomes for women.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Glob Womens Health
                Front Glob Womens Health
                Front. Glob. Womens Health
                Frontiers in Global Women's Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2673-5059
                20 March 2023
                2023
                : 4
                : 1117724
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Department of Economics, University of North Carolina at Greensboro , Greensboro, NC, United States
                [ 2 ]Department of Educational Studies, Davidson College , Davidson, NC, United States
                [ 3 ]School of Economics, Georgia Institute of Technology , Atlanta, GA, United States
                [ 4 ]Department of Economics, University of Kansas , Lawrence, KS, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Chelsea Morroni, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom

                Reviewed by: Mustafa Kaplanoglu, Cukurova University, Türkiye Caterina Muratori, San Diego State University, United States Andrea Kelly, Grinnell College, United States

                [* ] Correspondence: Martin S. Andersen msander4@ 123456uncg.edu

                Specialty Section: This article was submitted to Contraception and Family Planning, a section of the journal Frontiers in Global Women's Health

                Article
                10.3389/fgwh.2023.1117724
                10067718
                37020904
                d682f3c4-d262-4661-beb0-12959e47cc72
                © 2023 Andersen, Marsicano, Pineda Torres and Slusky.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 06 December 2022
                : 28 February 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 2, Equations: 19, References: 52, Pages: 0, Words: 0
                Categories
                Global Women's Health
                Original Research

                abortion,health policy,public policy,digital health,mobility

                Comments

                Comment on this article