107
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Ariadne principles: how to handle multimorbidity in primary care consultations

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Multimorbidity is a health issue mostly dealt with in primary care practice. As a result of their generalist and patient-centered approach, long-lasting relationships with patients, and responsibility for continuity and coordination of care, family physicians are particularly well placed to manage patients with multimorbidity. However, conflicts arising from the application of multiple disease oriented guidelines and the burden of diseases and treatments often make consultations challenging. To provide orientation in decision making in multimorbidity during primary care consultations, we developed guiding principles and named them after the Greek mythological figure Ariadne. For this purpose, we convened a two-day expert workshop accompanied by an international symposium in October 2012 in Frankfurt, Germany. Against the background of the current state of knowledge presented and discussed at the symposium, 19 experts from North America, Europe, and Australia identified the key issues of concern in the management of multimorbidity in primary care in panel and small group sessions and agreed upon making use of formal and informal consensus methods. The proposed preliminary principles were refined during a multistage feedback process and discussed using a case example. The sharing of realistic treatment goals by physicians and patients is at the core of the Ariadne principles. These result from i) a thorough interaction assessment of the patient’s conditions, treatments, constitution, and context; ii) the prioritization of health problems that take into account the patient’s preferences – his or her most and least desired outcomes; and iii) individualized management realizes the best options of care in diagnostics, treatment, and prevention to achieve the goals. Goal attainment is followed-up in accordance with a re-assessment in planned visits. The occurrence of new or changed conditions, such as an increase in severity, or a changed context may trigger the (re-)start of the process. Further work is needed on the implementation of the formulated principles, but they were recognized and appreciated as important by family physicians and primary care researchers.

          Please see related article: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/12/222.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-014-0223-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action.

            The growing number of persons suffering from major chronic illnesses face many obstacles in coping with their condition, not least of which is medical care that often does not meet their needs for effective clinical management, psychological support, and information. The primary reason for this may be the mismatch between their needs and care delivery systems largely designed for acute illness. Evidence of effective system changes that improve chronic care is mounting. We have tried to summarize this evidence in the Chronic Care Model (CCM) to guide quality improvement. In this paper we describe the CCM, its use in intensive quality improvement activities with more than 100 health care organizations, and insights gained in the process.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Guiding principles for the care of older adults with multimorbidity: an approach for clinicians: American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on the Care of Older Adults with Multimorbidity.

              (2012)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                muth@allgemeinmedizin.uni-frankfurt.de
                marjan.vandenakker@maastrichtuniversity.nl
                j.w.blom@lumc.nl
                c.d.mallen@keele.ac.uk
                rochon@imbi.uni-heidelberg.de
                f.schellevis@nivel.nl
                annette.becker@Staff.Uni-Marburg.DE
                beyer@allgemeinmedizin.uni-frankfurt.de
                jochen.gensichen@med.uni-jena.de
                forschung@hanna-kirchner.de
                rafael.perera@phc.ox.ac.uk
                sprados.iacs@aragon.es
                m.scherer@uke.de
                ulrich.thiem@rub.de
                bussche@uke.de
                paul_glasziou@bond.edu.au
                Journal
                BMC Med
                BMC Med
                BMC Medicine
                BioMed Central (London )
                1741-7015
                8 December 2014
                8 December 2014
                2014
                : 12
                : 1
                : 223
                Affiliations
                [ ]Institute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt, Germany
                [ ]School CAPHRI, Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of General Practice, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, blok J, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
                [ ]Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
                [ ]Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG UK
                [ ]Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics (IMBI), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 305, D‐69120 Heidelberg, Germany
                [ ]Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Postbus 1568, 3500BN Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of General Practice and Elderly care medicine/EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Family Medicine, Preventive and Rehabilitative Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 4, D-35043 Marburg, Germany
                [ ]Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Bachstraße 18, D-07740 Jena, Germany
                [ ]Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, 23-38 Hythe Bridge Street, Oxford, OX1 2ET UK
                [ ]EpiChron Research Group on Chronic Diseases, Aragon Health Sciences Institute, IIS Aragón, Paseo Isabel La Católica 1-3, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
                [ ]Department of Primary Medical Care, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
                [ ]Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ruhr University of Bochum, Overbergstr. 17, 44801 Bochum, Germany
                [ ]Department of Geriatrics, Marienhospital Herne, Clinical Centre of the Ruhr University, Widumer Str. 8, 44627 Herne, Germany
                [ ]The Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice (CREBP), Bond University, Gold Coast, Robina QLD 4226 Australia
                Article
                223
                10.1186/s12916-014-0223-1
                4259090
                25484244
                d68e7c6d-30ca-41fe-86d4-a9c39f5d414a
                © Muth et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 4 July 2014
                : 4 November 2014
                Categories
                Correspondence
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2014

                Medicine
                comorbidity,decision making,general practice,goal-oriented care,multimorbidity,patient-centered care,patient care planning,patient preference,primary care

                Comments

                Comment on this article