48
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      To submit your manuscript, please click here

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Randomized Waitlist-Control Trial of a Web-Based Stress-Management and Resiliency Program for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors: Protocol for the Bounce Back Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The emotional health of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors is compromised both during and after cancer treatment. Targeted programs designed to support AYAs’ ability to cope with stress in the years following treatment completion are lacking. Mind-body programs may ameliorate the negative psychological and emotional effects of stress and assist AYAs with managing the psychosocial challenges of early survivorship.

          Objective

          Our randomized waitlist-control trial aims to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a virtual group program (Bounce Back) to promote stress management and resiliency among posttreatment AYAs.

          Methods

          Bounce Back is a stress management and resiliency program delivered via videoconference by a trained mental health clinician. Sessions were adapted from an evidence-based mind-body program (Stress Management and Resiliency Training - Relaxation Response Resiliency Program [SMART-3RP]) grounded in relaxation response elicitation, mindfulness, cognitive behavioral therapy, and positive psychology. Seventy-two AYAs (diagnosed with cancer between ages 14 years and 29 years and had completed cancer treatment within the last 5 years) were randomly assigned to the Bounce Back program or waitlist-control group and completed assessments at baseline, 3 months postbaseline, and 6 months postbaseline. The primary aim of the study is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of the Bounce Back program. Descriptive statistics, including means, frequencies, and ranges supplemented by qualitative exit interview feedback will be used to characterize the sample and to summarize feasibility and acceptability. The exploratory aims are to evaluate the preliminary effects of the program on stress coping and psychosocial outcome measures (ie, anxiety, depression) collected across the 3 time points.

          Results

          This study was funded by the National Cancer Institute in July 2017. Study procedures were approved by the Dana-Farber Harvard Cancer Center Institutional Review Board in October 2018 (Protocol 18-428). The randomized trial was conducted from July 2019 to March 2021. Quantitative data collection is complete, and qualitative exit interview data collection is ongoing. Results are expected to be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at local, national, or international meetings in the coming years.

          Conclusions

          Few evidence-based programs exist that tackle the key transitional issues faced by AYA cancer survivors. Future analyses will help us determine the feasibility and acceptability of the Bounce Back program and its impact on AYA stress coping and psychological well-being.

          Trial Registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03768336; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03768336

          International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

          DERR1-10.2196/34033

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Fearing the unknown: a short version of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale.

          Intolerance of uncertainty is the tendency of an individual to consider the possibility of a negative event occurring unacceptable, irrespective of the probability of occurrence. It is a key component of worry, state anxiety, and related anxiety pathologies. The 27-item Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS) was developed to measure intolerance of uncertainty. Previous psychometric analyses of the IUS have suggested both four- and five-factor models. High inter-item correlations, factor instability, and previous theoretical research support the development of a reduced measure. The present study used two undergraduate samples and evaluated a psychometrically stable 12-item two-factor version of the IUS. The reduced measure (IUS-12) retained exemplary internal consistency, while correlating extremely well with the original IUS and related measures of anxiety and worry. The IUS-12 also demonstrated a stable two-factor structure, representing both anxious and avoidance components of intolerance of uncertainty. Directions for future research and potential applications for assessment are discussed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Development and validation of the penn state worry questionnaire

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Why do people worry?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Res Protoc
                JMIR Res Protoc
                ResProt
                JMIR Research Protocols
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                1929-0748
                January 2022
                26 January 2022
                : 11
                : 1
                : e34033
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, MA United States
                [2 ] University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center Worcester, MA United States
                [3 ] Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston, MA United States
                [4 ] Connecticut Children’s Medical Center Hartford, CT United States
                [5 ] University of Vermont Medical Center Burlington, VT United States
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Helen Mizrach hmizrach@ 123456mgh.harvard.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8869-2571
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7417-7488
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6319-264X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1336-8261
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8503-8360
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1093-3755
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6770-801X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2681-3328
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6645-2654
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0874-2645
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5578-3829
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2407-2522
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3143-244X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9438-2449
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7969-6167
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5859-3679
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7138-6404
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7524-4961
                Article
                v11i1e34033
                10.2196/34033
                8829691
                35080500
                d6a981b2-8af6-455d-a99f-dfd48018c53f
                ©Helen Mizrach, Brett Goshe, Elyse R Park, Christopher Recklitis, Joseph A Greer, Yuchiao Chang, Natasha Frederick, Annah Abrams, Mary D Tower, Emily A Walsh, Mary Huang, Lisa Kenney, Alan Homans, Karen Miller, John Denninger, Ghazala Naheed Usmani, Jeffrey Peppercorn, Giselle K Perez. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 26.01.2022.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 28 October 2021
                : 12 November 2021
                Categories
                Protocol
                Protocol
                Custom metadata
                This paper was peer reviewed by NCI-J - Subcommittee J - Career Development - National Cancer Institute Initial Review Group (National Institutes of Health, USA);

                cancer survivorship,adolescent and young adult (aya),resiliency,stress management,coping

                Comments

                Comment on this article