6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      La producción científica de estudiantes relacionados con los programas de las Ciencias de la Salud Translated title: Students’ Scientific Production Related to Health Sciences Programs

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          RESUMEN La producción científica estudiantil forma parte de los productos de la investigación formativa; sin embargo, su frecuencia es limitada. El objetivo del estudio fue recopilar las fuentes de información que describen la producción científica de estudiantes del pregrado, relacionados con los programas de las Ciencias de la Salud. Se diseñó un estudio del tipo revisión sistemática donde se utilizaron las bases de datos Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed y SciELO. La variable primaria incluyó la producción científica de los estudiantes de pregrado. Otras variables recolectadas fueron: programa de estudio, tipo de producción y características de los estudiantes. Se encontraron 16 artículos. La mayoría de los estudios (n = 9) se realizaron en el programa de Medicina Humana; cuatro en Odontología y tres en la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, que involucra múltiples programas de las Ciencias de la Salud. De acuerdo con su diseño metodológico, 11 estudios fueron bibliométricos y cinco realizaron encuestas. Los estudios bibliométricos reportan baja producción científica de los estudiantes en las revistas indizadas en las bases de datos SciELO, PubMed, entre otras. Algunas investigaciones indicaron que los estudiantes que pertenecían a una sociedad científica estudiantil presentaban más publicaciones científicas. La producción científica estudiantil reportada en los estudios es heterogénea con frecuencias del 2 al 12 %. La mayoría de estudios se han realizado en el programa de Medicina Humana y en Perú. Los principales tipos de artículos donde aparece un estudiante son los originales y el principal aporte del estudiante es el de ser coautor.

          Translated abstract

          ABSTRACT Student scientific production is part of the products of formative research; however, its frequency is limited. The objective of this study was to collect information sources describing the scientific production of undergraduate students, related to Health Sciences programs. A systematic review type study was designed using Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed and SciELO databases. The primary variable included the scientific production of undergraduate students. Other variables collected were study program, type of production and characteristics of the students. Sixteen articles were found. The majority of the studies (n = 9) were conducted in Human Medicine program; four in Dentistry and three in the School of Medical Sciences, which involves multiple Health Sciences programs. According to its methodological design, eleven studies were bibliometric and five conducted surveys. Bibliometric studies report low scientific production of students in journals indexed in SciELO and PubMed databases, among others. Some research indicated that students who were part of a student scientific society had more scientific publications. The student scientific production reported in the studies is heterogeneous with frequencies of 2 to 12%. The majority of studies have been carried out in the Human Medicine program and in Peru. The main types of articles where a student appears are originals and the student's main contribution is being a co-author.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.

          The expansion of evidence-based practice across sectors has lead to an increasing variety of review types. However, the diversity of terminology used means that the full potential of these review types may be lost amongst a confusion of indistinct and misapplied terms. The objective of this study is to provide descriptive insight into the most common types of reviews, with illustrative examples from health and health information domains. Following scoping searches, an examination was made of the vocabulary associated with the literature of review and synthesis (literary warrant). A simple analytical framework -- Search, AppraisaL, Synthesis and Analysis (SALSA) -- was used to examine the main review types. Fourteen review types and associated methodologies were analysed against the SALSA framework, illustrating the inputs and processes of each review type. A description of the key characteristics is given, together with perceived strengths and weaknesses. A limited number of review types are currently utilized within the health information domain. Few review types possess prescribed and explicit methodologies and many fall short of being mutually exclusive. Notwithstanding such limitations, this typology provides a valuable reference point for those commissioning, conducting, supporting or interpreting reviews, both within health information and the wider health care domain.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Book: not found

            Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review

            Reviewing the literature is an essential part of every research project. This book takes you step-by-step through the process of approaching your literature review systematically, applying systematic principles to a wide range of literature review types. Through numerous examples, case studies, and exercises, the book covers often neglected areas of literature review such as concept analysis, scoping, and mapping.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effect of two Howard Hughes Medical Institute research training programs for medical students on the likelihood of pursuing research careers.

              To assess the effect of Howard Hughes Medical Institute's (HHMI) two one-year research training programs for medical students on the awardees' research careers. Awardees of the HHMI Cloister Program who graduated between 1987 and 1995 and awardees of the HHMI Medical Fellows Program who graduated between 1991 and 1995 were compared with unsuccessful applicants to the programs and MD-PhD students who graduated during the same periods. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess research career outcomes while controlling for academic and demographic variables that could affect selection to the programs. Participation in both HHMI programs increased the likelihood of receiving National Institutes of Health postdoctoral support. Participation in the Cloister Program also increased the likelihood of receiving a faculty appointment with research responsibility at a medical school. In addition, awardees of the Medical Fellows Program were not significantly less likely than Medical Scientist Training Program (MSTP) and non-MSTP MD-PhD program participants to receive a National Institutes of Health postdoctoral award, and awardees of the Cloister Program were not significantly less likely than non-MSTP MD-PhD students to receive a faculty appointment with research responsibility. Women and underrepresented minority students were proportionally represented among awardees of the two HHMI programs whereas they were relatively underrepresented in MD-PhD programs. The one-year intensive research training supported by the HHMI training programs appears to provide an effective imprinting experience on medical students' research careers and to be an attractive strategy for training physician-scientists.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                ics
                Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud
                Rev. cuba. inf. cienc. salud
                Centro Nacional de Información de Ciencias Médicas; Editorial Ciencias Médicas (La Habana, , Cuba )
                2307-2113
                2023
                : 34
                : e2232
                Affiliations
                [1] Lima orgnameUniversidad Científica del Sur orgdiv1Carrera de Estomatología Peru
                Article
                S2307-21132023000100023 S2307-2113(23)03400000023
                d6c3aca7-4686-49c1-9df8-56d2b5d7051a

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 28 June 2023
                : 19 May 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 40, Pages: 0
                Product

                SciELO Cuba

                Categories
                ARTÍCULO DE REVISIÓN

                producción científica,estudiantes,comunicación científica,Health Sciences,students,scientific communication,scientific production,Ciencias de la Salud

                Comments

                Comment on this article