For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
10
views
29
references
 Top references
cited by
23
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      108
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Approach to pseudomyxoma peritonei

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a mucinous tumour of the appendix that spreads into the peritoneal cavity in the form of gelatinous deposits. The incidence of PMP is believed to be approximately 1-3 out of a million per year. Nonetheless, due to its indolent nature, it is usually discovered at an advanced stage and severely impacts quality of life. Curative treatment for PMP is complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). An extensive literature review was conducted searching EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases for PMP in aims to delineate a clinical approach to diagnosis and treatment. Literature was limited to the years 2007-2018. We found the 5-year overall survival with CRS and HIPEC estimated to be between 23%-82% and rates of major complications as high as 24%. Therefore, it is important to appropriately stage and select patients that should undergo CRS with HIPEC. Modalities like MDCT radiological scores have been shown to have sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 81%, respectively, in being able to predict resectability and survival. Despite treatment, the disease often recurs. Tumor markers have significant potential for establishing prognosis pre-operatively, and this paper will review the most recent evidence in support of them.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Should the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis by cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy still be regarded as a highly morbid procedure?: a systematic review of morbidity and mortality.

          Terence C Chua, Tristan D Yan, Akshat Saxena … (2009)
          : Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been offered in many institutions worldwide since the 1990s. Despite its existence of more than 10 years, this treatment has received heavy criticism for its morbidity and mortality rates. This consequentially resulted in a lack of randomized trials being conducted and translates into a lack of the most reliable form of scientific evidence in clinical research, hence limiting its general acceptance. : To report the morbidity and mortality outcomes of CRS and HIPEC from all institutions performing this treatment as a prelude toward establishing the safety of this treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis. : A systematic review of relevant studies before August 2008 was performed. Each study was appraised using a predetermined protocol. The quality of studies was assessed. The morbidity and mortality of the treatment were synthesized through a narrative review with full tabulation of results of all included studies. : The morbidity and mortality outcomes of CRS and HIPEC are similar to a major gastrointestinal surgery, such as a Whipple's procedure. To derive the maximal benefit of this treatment, careful patient selection with an optimal level of postoperative care must be advocated to avoid undesirable complications of this treatment.
          Article 0 comments Cited 112 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis and peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis. A clinicopathologic analysis of 109 cases with emphasis on distinguishing pathologic features, site of origin, prognosis, and relationship to "pseudomyxoma peritonei".

            B M Ronnett, C Zahn, R Kurman … (1995)
            Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a poorly understood condition characterized by mucinous ascites and mucinous implants diffusely involving the peritoneal surfaces. There is considerable debate regarding the definition, pathology, site of origin, and prognosis of PMP. We analyzed the clinicopathologic features of 109 cases of multifocal peritoneal mucinous tumors to develop a pathologic definition of cases characterized by the clinical condition PMP. Cases were separated into two diagnostic categories: disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis (DPAM) and peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis (PMCA). Cases classified as DPAM were characterized by peritoneal lesions composed of abundant extracellular mucin containing scant simple to focally proliferative mucinous epithelium with little cytologic atypia or mitotic activity, with or without an associated appendiceal mucinous adenoma. Cases classified as PMCA were characterized by peritoneal lesions composed of more abundant mucinous epithelium with the architectural and cytologic features of carcinoma, with or without an associated primary mucinous adenocarcinoma. Sixty-five of the 109 cases (59.6%) were classified as DPAM consistent with origin from an appendiceal mucinous adenoma. Thirty-seven of the 65 cases (56.9%) had a documented appendiceal mucinous adenoma. Thirty cases (27.5%) were classified as PMCA consistent with origin from an appendiceal or intestinal mucinous adenocarcinoma. Fourteen cases (12.8%) were classified as PMCA with features intermediate between DPAM and PMCA or with discordant features based on the finding of at least focal areas of carcinoma in the peritoneal lesions, whether or not the primary site demonstrated carcinoma. The cases with intermediate features were derived from well-differentiated appendiceal or intestinal mucinous adenocarcinomas and had peritoneal lesions displaying features of DPAM as well as focal areas of mucinous carcinoma. The cases with discordant features were derived from atypical appendiceal adenomas with little or no histologic evidence of a transition from adenoma to carcinoma and had peritoneal lesions uniformly composed of mucinous carcinoma. There was a statistically significant difference in survival between cases classified as DPAM, those classified as PMCA with intermediate or discordant features, and those classified as PMCA (p < 0.0001). The age-adjusted 5-year survival rates were 84% for patients with DPAM, 37.6% for patients with PMCA with intermediate or discordant features, and 6.7% for patients with PMCA. The term DPAM should be used to diagnose the histologically benign peritoneal lesions associated with ruptured appendiceal mucinous adenomas and those that are pathologically identical but lack a demonstrable appendiceal adenoma. Cases with the pathologic features of adenocarcinoma should be designated PMCA because they have recognizably different pathologic features and a significantly worse prognosis.
            Article 0 comments Cited 95 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: a clinicopathologic analysis of 107 cases.

              Joseph Misdraji, Rhonda K Yantiss, Fiona M Graeme-Cook … (2003)
              The classification of appendiceal mucinous tumors is controversial and terminology used for them inconsistent, particularly when they lack overtly malignant features but are associated with extra-appendiceal spread. We reviewed 107 appendiceal mucinous neoplasms and classified them as low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) (n = 88), mucinous adenocarcinomas (MACAs) (n = 16), or discordant (n = 3) based on architectural and cytologic features. LAMNs were characterized by a villous or flat proliferation of mucinous epithelium with low-grade atypia. Thirty-nine tumors were confined to the appendix, but 49 had extra-appendiceal tumor spread, including 39 with peritoneal tumor characterized by mucin pools harboring low-grade mucinous epithelium, usually dissecting in a hyalinized stroma. Eight of the 16 MACAs lacked destructive invasion of the appendiceal wall and eight showed an infiltrative pattern of invasion. Extra-appendiceal tumor spread was present in 12 MACAs (four peritoneum, seven peritoneum and ovaries; one ovaries only). In MACAs with an infiltrative pattern, peritoneal tumor consisted of glands and single cells in a desmoplastic stroma. The peritoneal tumor in the remaining cases consisted of mucin pools that contained mucinous epithelium with high-grade atypia and, in some cases, increased cellularity compared with that seen in peritoneal spread in cases of LAMN. Three cases were classified as discordant because the appendiceal tumors were LAMNs but the peritoneal tumors were high-grade. Follow-up was available for 49 LAMNs, 15 MACAs, and 2 discordant cases. None of the patients with LAMNs confined to the appendix experienced recurrence (median follow-up 6 years). LAMNs with extra-appendiceal spread were associated with 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates of 100%, 86%, and 45%, respectively. Patients with MACA had 3- and 5-year survival rates of 90% and 44%, respectively (p = 0.04). The bulk of peritoneal disease correlated with prognosis among patients with MACA (p = 0.04) and, to a lesser degree, among patients with LAMNs (p = 0.07). We conclude that: 1) appendiceal mucinous neoplasms can be classified as either low-grade mucinous neoplasms or mucinous adenocarcinoma based on architectural and cytologic features; 2) tumors that can be confidently placed in the low-grade group (which requires rigorous pathologic evaluation of the appendix) and are confined to the appendix are clinically benign in our experience to date; 3) low-grade tumors confined to the appendix are morphologically identical to those with extra-appendiceal spread (except for the usual identification of breach of the wall in the latter cases) and the same designation is appropriate for the appendiceal neoplasia in each situation; 4) the long-term outlook for patients with low-grade tumors and peritoneal spread is guarded with just over half dying of disease after 10 years; 5) appendiceal mucinous tumors with destructive invasion of the appendiceal wall, complex epithelial proliferations, or high-grade nuclear atypia generally pursue an aggressive clinical course and should be classified as mucinous adenocarcinomas; 6) peritoneal tumor can be classified as involvement by LAMN or MACA, and this distinction is of prognostic significance; 7) bulky peritoneal tumor worsens prognosis; and 8) LAMNs associated with high-grade peritoneal tumor behave as adenocarcinoma.
              Article 0 comments Cited 72 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Syed Ali Rizvi
                Wajahat Syed
                Ravi Shergill
                Journal
                Journal ID (nlm-ta): World J Gastrointest Surg
                Journal ID (publisher-id): WJGS
                Title: World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
                Publisher: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
                ISSN (Electronic): 1948-9366
                Publication date (Print): 27 August 2018
                Publication date (Electronic): 27 August 2018
                Volume: 10
                Issue: 5
                Pages: 49-56
                Affiliations
                Undergraduate Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada. ali.rizvi@ 123456medportal.ca
                Undergraduate Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
                Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
                Author notes

                Author contributions: Rizvi SA drafted the initial manuscript, conceived of the idea, and performed analysis and interpretation of the data; Syed W and Shergill R assisted with data analysis and making critical revisions related to important intellectual content of the manuscript.

                Correspondence to: Syed Ali Rizvi, BSc, Medical Student, Undergraduate Medicine, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada. ali.rizvi@ 123456medportal.ca

                Telephone: +1-647-7722061

                Article
                Other ID: jWJGS.v10.i5.pg49
                DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v10.i5.49
                PMC ID: 6121001
                PubMed ID: 30190782
                SO-VID: d6ec61c1-233a-497f-ae94-f75a096ac1cb
                Copyright © ©The Author(s) 2018. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
                License:

                This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.

                History
                Date received : 27 June 2018
                Date revision received : 1 August 2018
                Date accepted : 6 August 2018
                Categories
                Subject: Minireviews

                Keywords: pseudomyxoma peritonei,cytoreductive surgery,hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy,mucocele,appendix
                Data availability:
                Keywords: pseudomyxoma peritonei, cytoreductive surgery, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, mucocele, appendix

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content108

                See all similar

                Cited by21

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors276

                See all reference authors