33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Beyond Biology: The Crucial Role of Sex and Gender in Oncology

      Submit here before May 31, 2024

      About Oncology Research and Treatment: 2.4 Impact Factor I 3.3 CiteScore I 0.495 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Gemcitabine plus Paclitaxel as First-Line Chemotherapy for Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine and paclitaxel as first-line treatment in advanced breast cancer. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic or metastatic plus locally advanced breast cancer received gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on days 1 and 8 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1 every 21 days for 8 cycles. Results: From December 1999 to August 2001, 45 patients, with a median age of 53.5 years (range, 22–77), received a total of 260 cycles. All were assessable for response and toxicity. Twenty-seven patients had prior adjuvant therapy. Hormonal receptor status was positive in 31.1% and negative in 40.0% of patients. Main metastatic sites included soft tissue (62.2%) and lung (53.3%). The objective response rate was 66.7%; complete response, 22.2%; partial response, 44.4%; stable disease, 15.6%; progressive disease, 17.8%. Median duration of response was 18 months and median time to tumor progression was 11 months. Grade 3/4 leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia developed in 13.3% of patients, and 15.5% developed grade 3/4 mucositis. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Median overall survival was 19 months. Conclusion: Gemcitabine plus paclitaxel is an active combination with a favorable toxicity profile as first-line treatment for patients with advanced breast cancer.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Gemcitabine as First-Line Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Phase II Trial

          Objectives: This phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: Women with histologically or cytologically confirmed bidimensionally measurable MBC not amendable to curative surgery or radiation were eligible. Prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease was not permitted. Patients received gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8 and 15 for 3 weeks every 28 days for a maximum of 8 cycles. Results: Thirty-nine patients, with a median age of 58 years, were enrolled. The overall response rate for the 35 evaluable patients was 37.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.5–55.1%), with 2 complete responses and 11 partial responses. Median time to progression and survival were 5.1 months (95% CI, 3.5–8.8 months) and 21.1 months (95% CI, 11.0–26.9 months), respectively. Chemotherapy was well tolerated, with a median of 4 cycles completed. Grade 4 toxicities were 1 infection and 1 abnormal pulmonary function. Grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 30.3% and 6.3% of patients, respectively. The most common grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity was nausea/vomiting (10.3%). Five of 21 patients had improved Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scores. Conclusion: Single-agent gemcitabine is active and well tolerated as first-line treatment in patients with MBC.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Phase II trial of the use of paclitaxel and gemcitabine as a salvage treatment in metastatic breast cancer.

            The purpose of this study was to evaluate gemcitabine plus paclitaxel in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients with MBC with second or third relapse to anthracycline-containing regimens received a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on day 1, and gemcitabine 1.0 g/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15, every 28 days. Because of unacceptable thrombocytopenia seen in the first 5 patients, the gemcitabine schedule was changed to days 1 and 8 (G-1,8) for the remainder of the study, every 21 days. Twenty-nine patients (median age, 46 years; range, 32-68 years) received 137 cycles (median: 4 per patient). The regimen was well tolerated. World Health Organization grades III and IV thrombocytopenia were observed in 5 (18.5%) of the first 27 cycles (G-1,8,15), and in 6 (5.4%) of the 110 subsequent cycles (G-1,8)--p = 0.04 for the difference between schedules. Five patients had grade I and two had grade III neuropathy. Eight patients had grade III neutropenia, two had grade IV neutropenia associated with fever (G-1,8,15), and eight had grades I and II myalgia and fatigue. There were 16 (55%) objective responses (95% CI 36-73%); 5 (17%) complete responses, 11 (38%) partial responses (95% CI 3-30% and 19-56%, respectively), and 6 (20.5%) patients with stable disease. Median response duration was 8 months (range, 4-26 months). Median overall survival was 12 months (range, 4-28+ months), and 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 45% and 30%, respectively. This phase II study demonstrated a manageable toxicity profile with the gemcitabine day 1, 8 schedule in combination with paclitaxel and significant and promising activity in heavily pretreated patients with MBC. A confirmatory phase III trial is warranted.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical, toxicological and pharmacological aspects of gemcitabine

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                OCL
                Oncology
                10.1159/issn.0030-2414
                Oncology
                S. Karger AG
                0030-2414
                1423-0232
                2004
                March 2004
                19 March 2004
                : 66
                : 1
                : 18-23
                Affiliations
                aHospital Privado de Comunidad, Mar del Plata, Argentina; bHospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, Lima, Perú; cInstituto de Oncología Ángel H. Roffo, and dSanatorio Municipal Julio Méndez, BuenosAires, Argentina
                Article
                76330 Oncology 2004;66:18–23
                10.1159/000076330
                15031594
                d7319d94-fd34-4e55-9d9e-90aad57623f1
                © 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 23 June 2003
                : 03 December 2003
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 2, References: 23, Pages: 6
                Categories
                Clinical Study

                Oncology & Radiotherapy,Pathology,Surgery,Obstetrics & Gynecology,Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine,Hematology
                Gemcitabine,Paclitaxel,First-line chemotherapy,Advanced breast cancer,Combination chemotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article