19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The ties to unbind: age-related differences in feature (un)binding in working memory for emotional faces

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In the present study, we investigated age-related differences in the processing of emotional stimuli. Specifically, we were interested in whether older adults would show deficits in unbinding emotional expression (i.e., either no emotion, happiness, anger, or disgust) from bound stimuli (i.e., photographs of faces expressing these emotions), as a hyper-binding account of age-related differences in working memory would predict. Younger and older adults completed different N-Back tasks (side-by-side 0-Back, 1-Back, 2-Back) under three conditions: match/mismatch judgments based on either the identity of the face (identity condition), the face’s emotional expression (expression condition), or both identity and expression of the face (both condition). The two age groups performed more slowly and with lower accuracy in the expression condition than in the both condition, indicating the presence of an unbinding process. This unbinding effect was more pronounced in older adults than in younger adults, but only in the 2-Back task. Thus, older adults seemed to have a specific deficit in unbinding in working memory. Additionally, no age-related differences were found in accuracy in the 0-Back task, but such differences emerged in the 1-Back task, and were further magnified in the 2-Back task, indicating independent age-related differences in attention/STM and working memory. Pupil dilation data confirmed that the attention/STM version of the task (1-Back) is more effortful for older adults than younger adults.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.

            In 2 experiments the authors examined whether individual differences in working-memory (WM) capacity are related to attentional control. Experiment 1 tested high- and low-WM-span (high-span and low-span) participants in a prosaccade task, in which a visual cue appeared in the same location as a subsequent to-be-identified target letter, and in an antisaccade task, in which a target appeared opposite the cued location. Span groups identified targets equally well in the prosaccade task, reflecting equivalence in automatic orienting. However, low-span participants were slower and less accurate than high-span participants in the antisaccade task, reflecting differences in attentional control. Experiment 2 measured eye movements across a long antisaccade session. Low-span participants made slower and more erroneous saccades than did high-span participants. In both experiments, low-span participants performed poorly when task switching from antisaccade to prosaccade blocks. The findings support a controlled-attention view of WM capacity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Taking time seriously. A theory of socioemotional selectivity.

              Socioemotional selectivity theory claims that the perception of time plays a fundamental role in the selection and pursuit of social goals. According to the theory, social motives fall into 1 of 2 general categories--those related to the acquisition of knowledge and those related to the regulation of emotion. When time is perceived as open-ended, knowledge-related goals are prioritized. In contrast, when time is perceived as limited, emotional goals assume primacy. The inextricable association between time left in life and chronological age ensures age-related differences in social goals. Nonetheless, the authors show that the perception of time is malleable, and social goals change in both younger and older people when time constraints are imposed. The authors argue that time perception is integral to human motivation and suggest potential implications for multiple subdisciplines and research interests in social, developmental, cultural, cognitive, and clinical psychology.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                21 April 2014
                2014
                : 5
                : 253
                Affiliations
                School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA, USA
                Author notes

                Edited by: Natalie Ebner, University of Florida, USA

                Reviewed by: Natalie Ebner, University of Florida, USA; Carla Marie Strickland-Hughes, University of Florida, USA; Christina M. Leclerc, State University of New York at Oswego, USA; Lixia Yang, Ryerson University, Canada

                *Correspondence: Didem Pehlivanoglu, School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, J. S. Coon Building, 654 Cherry Street, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA e-mail: dpehlivanoglu3@ 123456gatech.edu

                This article was submitted to Emotion Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology.

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00253
                4001040
                24795660
                d763b98b-4e1c-4d63-937a-9c2bdbde5126
                Copyright © 2014 Pehlivanoglu, Jain, Ariel and Verhaeghen.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 22 November 2013
                : 07 March 2014
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 64, Pages: 13, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research Article

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                hyper-binding,memory binding,working memory,aging,pupillary response,emotion

                Comments

                Comment on this article