7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Positive surgical margins are predictors of local recurrence in conservative kidney surgery for pT1 tumors

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Objectives:

          The clinical significance of positive surgical margin (PSM) after a Nephron Sparing Surgery (NSS) is controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between PSM and the risk of disease recurrence in patients with pT1 kidney tumors who underwent NSS.

          Materials and Methods:

          Retrospective cohort study. A total of 314 patients submitted to a NSS due to stage pT1 renal tumor between January 2010 and June 2015 were included. Recurrence-free survival was estimated. The Cox model was used to adjust the tumor size, histological grade, pathological stage, age, surgical margins and type of approach.

          Results:

          Overall PSM was 6.3% (n=22). Recurrence was evidenced in 9.1% (n=2) of patients with PSM and 3.5% (n=10) for the group of negative surgical margin (NSM). The estimated local recurrence-free survival rate at 3 years was 96.4% (95% CI 91.9 to 100) for the NSM group and 87.8% (95% CI 71.9 to 100) for PSM group (p=0.02) with no difference in metastasis-free survival. The PSM and pathological high grade (Fuhrman grade III or IV) were independent predictors of local recurrence in the multivariate analysis (HR 12.9, 95%CI 1.8-94, p=0.011 / HR 38.3, 95%CI 3.1-467, p=0.004 respectively). Fuhrman grade proved to be predictor of distant recurrence (HR 8.1, 95%CI 1.6-39.7, p=0.011).

          Conclusions:

          The PSM in pT1 renal tumors showed to have higher risk of local recurrence and thus, worse oncological prognosis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma.

          The prognostic significance of morphologic parameters was evaluated in 103 patients with renal cell carcinoma diagnosed during 1961--1974. Pathologic material was classified as to pathologic stage, tumor size, cell arrangement, cell type and nuclear grade. Four nuclear grades (1--4) were defined in order of increasing nuclear size, irregularity and nucleolar prominence. Nuclear grade was more effective than each of the other parameters in predicting development of distant metastasis following nephrectomy. Among 45 patients who presented in Stage I, tumors classified as nuclear grade 1 did not metastasize for at least 5 years, whereas 50% of the higher grade tumors did so. Moreover, among Stage I tumors there was a significant difference in subsequent metastatic rate between nuclear grades 1 and 2. There was an apparent positive relationship between cell type and metastatic rate; clear cell tumors were less aggressive than predominantly granular cell tumors (metastatic rate 38% versus 71%). This relationship in part a function of the nuclear grade: only 5% of grade 3 and 4 tumors consisted of clear cells, whereas such high grades were seen in 57% of granular cell tumors. The size of the primary correlated well with the stage at the time of surgery. However, with the exception of extremely large and small tumors, the size was not useful in predicting the subsequent course of patients treated for Stage I tumors. Nuclear grade was the most significant prognostic criterion for the outcome of Stage I renal cell carcinoma.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients.

            Laparoscopy is currently challenging the role of the open approach for nephron-sparing surgery (NSS), yet comparative studies on this issue are scant. To compare surgical, oncologic, and functional outcomes after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN). We undertook matched-pair (age, sex, tumour size) analysis of patients who underwent elective NSS for renal masses either by laparoscopic (Klagenfurt) or open (Vienna) access. Surgical data, complications, histologic and oncologic data, and short- and long-term renal function of the open and laparoscopic groups were compared. In total, 200 patients matched for age, sex, and tumour size entered the study after either LPN or OPN and were followed for a mean of 3.6 yr. Surgical, ischemia, and hospitalisation times were shorter in the LPN group (p<0.001). Blood loss and complication rates were comparable in both groups. Malignant tumours were pT1 stage renal-cell cancer only in both groups. The positive surgical margin (PSM) rate was 4% after LPN and 2% after OPN (p=0.5); positive margins were not a risk factor for disease recurrence. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 5-yr local recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 97% after LPN and 98% after OPN (p=0.8); the respective numbers for distant free survival were 99% and 96% (p=0.2). Five-year overall survival (OS) for patients with pT1 stage renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was 96% after LPN and 85% after OPN. The decline in glomerular filtration rate at the last available follow-up (LPN: 10.9%; OPN: 10.6%) was similar in both groups (p=0.8). We recognise the retrospective nature, limited follow-up, and sample size as shortcomings of this study. In experienced hands, LPN provides similar results compared to open surgery. PSM rates were comparable after LPN and OPN. Current experience questions the indication of secondary nephrectomy in these patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Trends in renal surgery: robotic technology is associated with increased use of partial nephrectomy.

              Underuse of partial vs radical nephrectomy for renal tumors was noted in recent population based analyses. An explanation is the learning curve associated with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. We analyzed state trends in renal surgery and their relationship to the introduction of robotic technology. We used the Maryland HSCRC (Health Services Cost Review Commission) database to identify patients who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy, or renal ablation from 2000 to 2011. Utilization trends, and associated patient and hospital factors were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. ICD-9 robotic modifier codes were established in October 2008. Of the 14,260 patients included in analysis 11,271 (79.0%), 2,622 (18.4%) and 367 (2.6%) underwent radical and partial nephrectomy, and renal ablation, respectively. Partial nephrectomy increased from 8.6% in 2000 to 27% in 2011. Open radical nephrectomy decreased by 33%, while minimally invasive radical nephrectomy increased by 15%. Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy increased from 2008 to 2011, attaining a 14% rate at university and 10% at nonuniversity hospitals (p = 0.03). It was associated with increased partial nephrectomy (OR 9.67, p <0.001). Younger age, male gender and low patient complexity predicted partial nephrectomy on overall analysis, while higher hospital volume and university status were predictors only in earlier years. Partial nephrectomy use increased in Maryland from 2001 to 2011, which was facilitated by robotic technology. Associations with hospital factors decreased with time. These data suggest that robotic technology may enable surgeons across practice settings to more frequently perform nephron sparing surgery. Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int Braz J Urol
                Int Braz J Urol
                ibju
                International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
                Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
                1677-5538
                1677-6119
                May-Jun 2018
                May-Jun 2018
                : 44
                : 3
                : 475-482
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Urology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
                Author notes
                Correspondence address: Ignacio Tobia Gonzalez, MD Tte. Gral Juan Domingo Perón st. 4190 C.A.B.A. (ZC1199ABB), Argentina Fax: + 54 11 4983-7705 E-mail: ignacio.tobia@ 123456hospitalitaliano.org.ar

                CONFLICT OF INTEREST

                None declared.

                Article
                S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0039
                10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0039
                5996790
                29368873
                d7769afd-5690-4974-bb5e-d3afe7e630ee

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 25 January 2017
                : 30 October 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 30, Pages: 8
                Categories
                Original Article

                kidney,surgical procedures, neoplasms,prognosis
                kidney, surgical procedures, neoplasms, prognosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article