ScienceOpen:
research and publishing network
For Publishers
Discovery
Metadata
Peer review
Hosting
Publishing
For Researchers
Join
Publish
Review
Collect
My ScienceOpen
Sign in
Register
Dashboard
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Sign in
Register
Dashboard
Search
Search
Advanced search
For Publishers
Discovery
Metadata
Peer review
Hosting
Publishing
For Researchers
Join
Publish
Review
Collect
Blog
About
5
views
0
references
Top references
cited by
0
Cite as...
0 reviews
Review
0
comments
Comment
0
recommends
+1
Recommend
0
collections
Add to
0
shares
Share
Twitter
Sina Weibo
Facebook
Email
3,021
similar
All similar
Record
: found
Abstract
: not found
Article
: not found
Should reforms “stamp ghostwriting out” of science communication?
Publication date
(Electronic):
2017
Journal:
Physics Today
Publisher:
AIP Publishing
Read this article at
ScienceOpen
Publisher
Further versions
open (via page says license)
Powered by
Review
Review article
Invite someone to review
Bookmark
Cite as...
There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Related collections
Good practices in (cog-neuro) science and science communication
Author and article information
Journal
Journal ID (publisher-id):
PHTOAD
Title:
Physics Today
Abbreviated Title:
Phys. Today
Publisher:
AIP Publishing
ISSN (Electronic):
19450699
Publication date (Electronic):
2017
Article
DOI:
10.1063/PT.6.3.20171006a
SO-VID:
d79bb2e1-7e6c-47c6-b840-bfac1ef8f181
Copyright ©
© 2017
History
Data availability:
Comments
Comment on this article
Sign in to comment
scite_
Similar content
3,021
Ghostwriting: Research misconduct, plagiarism, or fool's gold?
Authors:
X Bosch
,
JS Ross
The CEO as celebrity blogger: is there a ghost or ghostwriter in the machine
Authors:
SA Terilli
,
LI Arnorsdottir
Legal remedies for medical ghostwriting: imposing fraud liability on guest authors of ghostwritten articles.
Authors:
S Sterns
,
T Lemmens
See all similar