8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Evidence-Base Update for Parenting Stress Measures in Clinical Samples

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="d304317e117">Parenting stress is relevant to the development, maintenance, and amelioration of youth mental, emotional, and behavioral health issues. This Evidence Base Update evaluates the empirical literature on the measurement of parenting stress to guide future research and inform clinical decision-making. After a comprehensive literature search, we identified eight well-studied measures of parenting stress, to which we applied the criteria put forth by Hunsley and Mash (2008) and extended by Youngstrom et al. (2017) to evaluate the evidence base for norms, validity, and utility. All measures were rated adequate, good, excellent, or no evidence on 11 psychometric categories (e.g., internal consistency, treatment sensitivity). Overall, the ability of identified measures to accurately and reliably assess parenting stress was strong. Although the psychometrics vary across measures, the aggregated findings support the existence of a parenting stress construct and further confirm the relevance of parenting stress to family functioning, youth psychopathology, and mental health interventions. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references120

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Parenting Stress and Child Adjustment: Some Old Hypotheses and New Questions

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Psychotherapy outcome research: Methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Parenting stress among caregivers of children with chronic illness: a systematic review.

              To critically review, analyze, and synthesize the literature on parenting stress among caregivers of children with asthma, cancer, cystic fibrosis, diabetes, epilepsy, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, and/or sickle cell disease. Method PsychInfo, MEDLINE, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched according to inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of 13 studies and qualitative analysis of 96 studies was conducted. Results Caregivers of children with chronic illness reported significantly greater general parenting stress than caregivers of healthy children (d = .40; p = ≤.0001). Qualitative analysis revealed that greater general parenting stress was associated with greater parental responsibility for treatment management and was unrelated to illness duration and severity across illness populations. Greater parenting stress was associated with poorer psychological adjustment in caregivers and children with chronic illness. Conclusion Parenting stress is an important target for future intervention. General and illness-specific measures of parenting stress should be used in future studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
                Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
                Informa UK Limited
                1537-4416
                1537-4424
                March 26 2018
                September 03 2019
                August 08 2019
                September 03 2019
                : 48
                : 5
                : 685-705
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology, Marquette University
                [2 ]Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University
                [3 ]Curry School of Education, University of Virginia
                [4 ]Department of Psychology, Suffolk University
                Article
                10.1080/15374416.2019.1639515
                31393178
                d7d1550c-063a-4b4a-8318-b953738de035
                © 2019
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article