9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reduced Salience and Enhanced Central Executive Connectivity Following PTSD Treatment

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In soldiers with posttraumatic stress disorder, symptom provocation was found to induce increased connectivity within the salience network, as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging and global brain connectivity with global signal regression (GBCr). However, it is unknown whether these GBCr disturbances would normalize following effective posttraumatic stress disorder treatment.

          Methods

          Sixty-nine US Army soldiers with (n = 42) and without posttraumatic stress disorder (n = 27) completed functional magnetic resonance imaging at rest and during symptom provocation using subject-specific script imagery. Then, participants with posttraumatic stress disorder received six weeks (12 sessions) of group cognitive processing therapy or present-centered therapy. At week 8, all participants repeated the functional magnetic resonance imaging scans. The primary analysis used a region-of-interest approach to determine the effect of treatment on salience GBCr. A secondary analysis was conducted to explore the pattern of GBCr alterations posttreatment in posttraumatic stress disorder participants compared to controls.

          Results

          Over the treatment period, present-centered therapy significantly reduced salience GBCr ( p = .02). Compared to controls, salience GBCr was high pretreatment (present-centered therapy, p = .01; cognitive processing therapy, p = .03) and normalized post-present-centered therapy ( p = .53) but not postcognitive processing therapy ( p = .006). Whole-brain secondary analysis found high GBCr within the central executive network in posttraumatic stress disorder participants compared to controls. Post hoc exploratory analyses showed significant increases in executive GBCr following cognitive processing therapy treatment ( p = .01).

          Conclusion

          The results support previous models relating cognitive processing therapy to central executive network and enhanced cognitive control while unraveling a previously unknown neurobiological mechanism of present-centered therapy treatment, demonstrating treatment-specific reduction in salience connectivity during trauma recollection.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Reliability and validity of a brief instrument for assessing post-traumatic stress disorder

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Quantitative meta-analysis of neural activity in posttraumatic stress disorder

            Background In recent years, neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) have played a significant role in elucidating the neural underpinnings of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, a detailed understanding of the neural regions implicated in the disorder remains incomplete because of considerable variability in findings across studies. The aim of this meta-analysis was to identify consistent patterns of neural activity across neuroimaging study designs in PTSD to improve understanding of the neurocircuitry of PTSD. Methods We conducted a literature search for PET and fMRI studies of PTSD that were published before February 2011. The article search resulted in 79 functional neuroimaging PTSD studies. Data from 26 PTSD peer-reviewed neuroimaging articles reporting results from 342 adult patients and 342 adult controls were included. Peak activation coordinates from selected articles were used to generate activation likelihood estimate maps separately for symptom provocation and cognitive-emotional studies of PTSD. A separate meta-analysis examined the coupling between ventromedial prefrontal cortex and amygdala activity in patients. Results Results demonstrated that the regions most consistently hyperactivated in PTSD patients included mid- and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, and when ROI studies were included, bilateral amygdala. By contrast, widespread hypoactivity was observed in PTSD including the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and the inferior frontal gyrus. Furthermore, decreased ventromedial prefrontal cortex activity was associated with increased amygdala activity. Conclusions These results provide evidence for a neurocircuitry model of PTSD that emphasizes alteration in neural networks important for salience detection and emotion regulation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A randomized clinical trial to dismantle components of cognitive processing therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in female victims of interpersonal violence.

              The purpose of this experiment was to conduct a dismantling study of cognitive processing therapy in which the full protocol was compared with its constituent components--cognitive therapy only (CPT-C) and written accounts (WA)--for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and comorbid symptoms. The intent-to-treat (ITT) sample included 150 adult women with PTSD who were randomized into 1 of the 3 conditions. Each condition consisted of 2 hr of therapy per week for 6 weeks; blind assessments were conducted before treatment, 2 weeks following the last session, and 6 months following treatment. Measures of PTSD and depression were collected weekly to examine the course of recovery during treatment as well as before and after treatment. Secondary measures assessed anxiety, anger, shame, guilt, and dysfunctional cognitions. Independent ratings of adherence and competence were also conducted. Analyses with the ITT sample and with study completers indicate that patients in all 3 treatments improved substantially on PTSD and depression, the primary measures, and improved on other indices of adjustment. However, there were significant group differences in symptom reduction during the course of treatment whereby the CPT-C condition reported greater improvement in PTSD than the WA condition. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks)
                Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks)
                CSS
                spcss
                Chronic Stress
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                2470-5470
                15 April 2019
                Jan-Dec 2019
                : 3
                : 2470547019838971
                Affiliations
                [1 ]National Center for PTSD – Clinical Neurosciences Division, US Department of Veterans Affairs, West Haven, CT, USA
                [2 ]Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
                [3 ]Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA
                [4 ]Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
                [5 ]Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
                [6 ]Research and Development Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA
                [7 ]Department of Psychology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
                [8 ]Research Imaging Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
                [9 ]Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
                Author notes
                [*]Chadi G. Abdallah, National Center for PTSD – Clinical Neurosciences Division, US Department of Veterans Affairs, 950 Campbell Avenue, 151E West Haven, CT 06516, USA. Email: chadi.abdallah@ 123456yale.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5783-6181
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7575-6142
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8985-9975
                Article
                10.1177_2470547019838971
                10.1177/2470547019838971
                6469713
                31008419
                d7d2f63c-24e5-490f-8c42-08774218dfdb
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 4 February 2019
                : 1 March 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute of Mental Health, FundRef https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.13039/100000025;
                Award ID: MH101498
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                January-December 2019

                posttraumatic stress disorder,functional connectivity,functional magnetic resonance imaging,symptom provocation,salience network

                Comments

                Comment on this article