2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Interspinous Process Decompression With The Superion ® Spacer For Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Real-World Experience From A Device Registry

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Interspinous process decompression (IPD) with stand-alone spacers has demonstrated excellent long-term clinical benefit for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

          Methods

          IPD used the Superion ® Indirect Decompression System (Vertiflex, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Perioperative and clinical data were captured via a registry for patients treated with IPD for LSS with intermittent neurogenic claudication. Three-hundred sixteen physicians at 86 clinical sites in the US participated. Patient data were captured from in-person interviews and a phone survey. Outcomes included intraoperative blood loss, procedural time, leg and back pain severity (100 mm VAS), patient satisfaction and treatment approval at 3 weeks, 6 and 12 months.

          Results

          The mean age of registry patients was 73.0 ± 9.1 years of which 54% were female. Mean leg pain severity decreased from 76.6 ± 22.4 mm preoperatively to 30.4 ± 34.6 mm at 12 months, reflecting an overall 60% improvement. Corresponding responder rates were 64% (484 of 751), 72% (1,097 of 1,523) and 75% (317 of 423) at 3 weeks, 6 and 12 months, respectively. Back pain severity improved from 76.8 ± 22.2 mm preoperatively to 39.9 ± 32.3 mm at 12 months (48% improvement); 12-month responder rate of 67% (297 of 441). For patient satisfaction at 3 weeks, 6 and 12 months, 89%, 80%, and 80% were satisfied or somewhat satisfied with their treatment and 90%, 75%, and 75% would definitely or probably undergo the same treatment again. In the phone survey, the rate of revision was 3.6% (51 of 1,426).

          Conclusion

          These registry findings support the clinical adoption of minimally invasive IPD in patients with neurogenic claudication associated with LSS.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and clinical outcomes: A systematic review

          Background Clinical quality registries (CQRs) are playing an increasingly important role in improving health outcomes and reducing health care costs. CQRs are established with the purpose of monitoring quality of care, providing feedback, benchmarking performance, describing pattern of treatment, reducing variation and as a tool for conducting research. Objectives To synthesise the impact of clinical quality registries (CQRs) as an ‘intervention’ on (I) mortality/survival; (II) measures of outcome that reflect a process or outcome of health care; (III) health care utilisation; and (IV) healthcare-related costs. Methods The following electronic databases were searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL and Google Scholar. In addition, a review of the grey literature and a reference check of citations and reference lists within articles was undertaken to identify relevant studies in English covering the period January 1980 to December 2016. The PRISMA-P methodology, checklist and standard search strategy using pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria and structured data extraction tools were used. Data on study design and methods, participant characteristics attributes of included registries and impact of the registry on outcome measures and/or processes of care were extracted. Results We identified 30102 abstracts from which 75 full text articles were assessed and finally 17 articles were selected for synthesis. Out of 17 studies, six focused on diabetes care, two on cardiac diseases, two on lung diseases and others on organ transplantations, rheumatoid arthritis, ulcer healing, surgical complications and kidney disease. The majority of studies were “before after” design (#11) followed by cohort design (#2), randomised controlled trial (#2), experimental non randomised study and one cross sectional comparison. The measures of impact of registries were multifarious and included change in processes of care, quality of care, treatment outcomes, adherence to guidelines and survival. Sixteen of 17 studies demonstrated positive findings in their outcomes after implementation of the registry. Conclusions Despite the large number of published articles using data derived from CQRs, few have rigorously evaluated the impact of the registry as an intervention on improving health outcomes. Those that have evaluated this impact have mostly found a positive impact on healthcare processes and outcomes. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42015017319
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            ISSLS Prize Winner: Consensus on the Clinical Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Results of an International Delphi Study.

            Delphi.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Bridging Unmet Medical Device Ecosystem Needs With Strategically Coordinated Registries Networks.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Med Devices (Auckl)
                Med Devices (Auckl)
                MDER
                mder
                Medical Devices (Auckland, N.Z.)
                Dove
                1179-1470
                03 October 2019
                2019
                : 12
                : 423-427
                Affiliations
                [1 ]The Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Center , Trumbull, CT 06611, USA
                [2 ]The Center of Neuromodulation, The University of Kansas Health System , Kansas City, KS 66103, USA
                [3 ]Florida Spine Specialists , Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33308, USA
                [4 ]Jupiter Interventional Pain Management , Jupiter, FL 33477, USA
                [5 ]The Center for Pain Relief , Charleston, WV 25304, USA
                [6 ]Independent Clinical Consultant , San Francisco, CA 94115, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Jon E Block 2210 Jackson Street, Ste. 401, San Francisco, CA94115, USATel +1 415 775 7947 Email jb@drjonblock.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8520-5694
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9954-8938
                Article
                220431
                10.2147/MDER.S220431
                6781846
                31632160
                d80cd49d-955a-4521-a420-56187360f31f
                © 2019 Tekmyster et al.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 22 June 2019
                : 20 September 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 3, References: 10, Pages: 5
                Categories
                Original Research

                Biotechnology
                superion®,interspinous spacer,lumbar spinal stenosis,neurogenic claudication,decompression

                Comments

                Comment on this article