12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Risk stratification of chromosomal abnormalities in chronic myelogenous leukemia in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Publisher's Note: There is an [Related article:]Inside Blood Commentary on this article in this issue.

          Key Points

          • Based on their impact on treatment and survival, ACAs in CML were stratified into good and poor prognostic groups.

          • ACAs in the good prognostic group showed no adverse impact on survival when they emerged from chronic phase or at the initial CML diagnosis.

          Abstract

          Clonal cytogenetic evolution with additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs) in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is generally associated with decreased response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy and adverse survival. Although ACAs are considered as a sign of disease progression and have been used as one of the criteria for accelerated phase, the differential prognostic impact of individual ACAs in CML is unknown, and a classification system to reflect such prognostic impact is lacking. In this study, we aimed to address these questions using a large cohort of CML patients treated in the era of TKIs. We focused on cases with single chromosomal changes at the time of ACA emergence and stratified the 6 most common ACAs into 2 groups: group 1 with a relatively good prognosis including trisomy 8, −Y, and an extra copy of Philadelphia chromosome; and group 2 with a relatively poor prognosis including i(17)(q10), −7/del7q, and 3q26.2 rearrangements. Patients in group 1 showed much better treatment response and survival than patients in group 2. When compared with cases with no ACAs, ACAs in group 2 conferred a worse survival irrelevant to the emergence phase and time. In contrast, ACAs in group 1 had no adverse impact on survival when they emerged from chronic phase or at the time of CML diagnosis. The concurrent presence of 2 or more ACAs conferred an inferior survival and can be categorized into the poor prognostic group.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Blood
          Blood
          bloodjournal
          blood
          Blood
          Blood
          American Society of Hematology (Washington, DC )
          0006-4971
          1528-0020
          2 June 2016
          22 March 2016
          2 June 2017
          : 127
          : 22
          : 2742-2750
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Hematopathology and
          [2 ]Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and
          [3 ]Department of Pathology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT
          Article
          PMC4915795 PMC4915795 4915795 2016/690230
          10.1182/blood-2016-01-690230
          4915795
          27006386
          d8318a39-7fef-4651-a16c-64f779ce35d5
          © 2016 by The American Society of Hematology
          History
          : 30 December 2015
          : 10 March 2016
          Page count
          Pages: 9
          Categories
          29
          33
          Myeloid Neoplasia
          Custom metadata
          free

          Comments

          Comment on this article