• Record: found
  • Abstract: found
  • Article: found
Is Open Access

The Incubation Period of Buruli Ulcer (Mycobacterium ulcerans Infection)

Read this article at

      There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


      IntroductionBuruli Ulcer (BU) is caused by the environmental microbe Mycobacterium ulcerans. Despite unclear transmission, contact with a BU endemic region is the key known risk factor. In Victoria, Australia, where endemic areas have been carefully mapped, we aimed to estimate the Incubation Period (IP) of BU by interviewing patients who reported defined periods of contact with an endemic area prior to BU diagnosis.MethodA retrospective review was undertaken of 408 notifications of BU in Victoria from 2002 to 2012. Telephone interviews using a structured questionnaire and review of notification records were performed. Patients with a single visit exposure to a defined endemic area were included and the period from exposure to disease onset determined (IP).ResultsWe identified 111 of 408 notified patients (27%) who had a residential address outside a known endemic area, of whom 23 (6%) reported a single visit exposure within the previous 24 months. The median age of included patients was 30 years (range: 6 to 73) and 65% were male. 61% had visited the Bellarine Peninsula, currently the most active endemic area. The median time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 71 days (range: 34–204 days). The midpoint of the reported IP range was utilized to calculate a point estimate of the IP for each case. Subsequently, the mean IP for the cohort was calculated at 135 days (IQR: 109–160; CI 95%: 113.9–156), corresponding to 4.5 months or 19.2 weeks. The shortest IP recorded was 32 days and longest 264 days (Figure 1 & 2). IP did not vary for variables investigated.ConclusionsThe estimated mean IP of BU in Victoria is 135 days (IQR: 109–160 days), 4.5 months. The shortest recorded was IP 34 days and longest 264 days. A greater understanding of BU IP will aid clinical risk assessment and future research.

      Author Summary

      Buruli Ulcer (BU) is a necrotizing skin infection caused by the environmental organism Mycobacterium ulcerans. Despite an unknown mode of transmission, contact with a BU endemic region is the known key risk factor. In Victoria, Australia, endemic areas have been carefully mapped and patients are known to report single visits or defined exposures to these areas. From a retrospective review, we identified 23 patients with a single visit exposure to BU endemic regions from a total of 408 notifications of BU in Victoria (2002–2012). We were able to estimate the time from exposure to disease onset, incubation period (IP), via notification record review and telephone questionnaire. The IP of the cohort was subsequently estimated at 4.5 months (Range 1–9 months). An understanding of the IP of BU will be of value to communities, clinicians and government health bodies via aiding clinical risk assessment, epidemiological studies and public health investigations in the future.

      Related collections

      Most cited references 20

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Development and application of two multiplex real-time PCR assays for the detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans in clinical and environmental samples.

      Mycobacterium ulcerans is a slow-growing environmental bacterium that causes a severe skin disease known as Buruli ulcer. PCR has become a reliable and rapid method for the diagnosis of M. ulcerans infection in humans and has been used for the detection of M. ulcerans in the environment. This paper describes the development of a TaqMan assay targeting IS2404 multiplexed with an internal positive control to monitor inhibition with a detection limit of less than 1 genome equivalent of DNA. The assay improves the turnaround time for diagnosis and replaces conventional gel-based PCR as the routine method for laboratory confirmation of M. ulcerans infection in Victoria, Australia. Following analysis of 415 clinical specimens, the new test demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity compared with culture. Another multiplex TaqMan assay targeting IS2606 and the ketoreductase-B domain of the M. ulcerans mycolactone polyketide synthase genes was designed to augment the specificity of the IS2404 PCR for the analysis of a variety of environmental samples. Assaying for these three targets enabled the detection of M. ulcerans DNA in soil, sediment, and mosquito extracts collected from an area of endemicity for Buruli ulcer in Victoria with a high degree of confidence. Final confirmation was obtained by the detection and sequencing of variable-number tandem repeat (VNTR) locus 9, which matched the VNTR locus 9 sequence obtained from the clinical isolates in this region. This suite of new methods is enabling rapid progress in the understanding of the ecology of this important human pathogen.
        • Record: found
        • Abstract: found
        • Article: found

        Mycobacterium ulcerans in Mosquitoes Captured during Outbreak of Buruli Ulcer, Southeastern Australia

        Buruli ulcer (BU), also known as Bairnsdale ulcer ( 1 ), Daintree ulcer ( 2 ), and Mossman ulcer in Australia, is an emerging disease of skin and soft tissue with potential to cause scarring and disability ( 3 ). It is caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans ( 4 ), an environmental pathogen that produces a destructive polyketide toxin, mycolactone ( 5 ); the genes for the production of this toxin are encoded on newly described plasmid pMUM001 ( 6 ). BU occurs in >30 countries worldwide, but it affects mainly children in sub-Saharan Africa, where it is now more common than tuberculosis and leprosy in some regions ( 7 ). This disease occurs in people of all ages and races who live in or visit BU-endemic areas, but the precise mode of transmission remains unknown. Analysis of the recently sequenced M. ulcerans genome has shown that in addition to pMUM001, there are unusually high copy numbers of 2 independent insertion sequences (IS2404 and IS2606) and a high incidence of pseudogene formation ( 8 ). These data suggest that M. ulcerans is unlikely to be free-living in the environment but is instead undergoing adaptation to a specific ecologic niche in which the products of some ancestral genes are no longer essential. One such niche may be in aquatic insects because M. ulcerans has recently been reported to colonize the salivary glands of carnivorous water bugs (Naucoridae) under laboratory conditions ( 9 ), and mycolactone production appears to be necessary for this colonization ( 10 ). Studies from disease-endemic areas in Africa have reported that farming activities near rivers ( 11 ) and swimming in rivers or marshes ( 12 ) may be risk factors for BU; bites from contaminated water bugs may transmit the infection. In temperate southeastern Australia, outbreaks of M. ulcerans infection occur in localized areas, but few patients report direct contact with environmental water other than the ocean, which led to the proposal that aerosols from contaminated water may cause human infections ( 13 ). However, these low-lying disease-endemic areas also harbor large populations of mosquitoes, and some patients have reported that BU first appeared at the site of what may have been a mosquito bite (Figure 1). These observations, and knowledge from field studies in Africa implicating insects as either a reservoir or mode of transmission, led us to capture and screen mosquitoes during our investigation of a large outbreak of BU in humans in a small coastal town in southeastern Australia (Point Lonsdale), ≈60 km south of Melbourne (Figure 2). Figure 1 Ear of an 18-month-old child with culture- and PCR-confirmed Buruli ulcer who briefly visited St. Leonards, Australia, in 2001 (Figure 2). The initial lesion resembled a mosquito bite or that of another insect. Figure 2 Map of central coastal Victoria, Australia, showing towns and places referred to in the text or in associated references. Methods Outbreak Investigation M. ulcerans infection has become increasingly common in the southern Australian state of Victoria since the early 1990s ( 14 , 15 ) and characteristically causes localized outbreaks ( 16 ). In 1995, a research group at the Royal Children’s Hospital in Melbourne developed an IS2404 PCR to improve speed and accuracy of diagnosis of BU ( 17 ). This method has now become the initial diagnostic method of choice in Australia and elsewhere ( 18 ). All PCR- and culture-positive cases of M. ulcerans infection in Victoria have been unofficially reported to the Victorian Department of Human Services (DHS) since the 1990s, and investigators from DHS began to routinely contact and interview all new reported case-patients in 2000. All new cases of M. ulcerans infection were made legally reportable in Victoria in January 2004 ( 19 ). Case Definition For this study, a case of BU was defined as a patient with a suggestive clinical lesion from which M. ulcerans was identified by PCR or culture from a swab or tissue biopsy specimen from January 2002 through April 2007; the patient must have been either a resident of, or a visitor to, Point Lonsdale or Queenscliff (adjacent coastal towns on the Bellarine Peninsula) who did not report a recent history of contact with another known BU-endemic area. Australian Bureau of Statistics data derived from the 2001 Australian Census for Point Lonsdale/Queenscliff (postcode 3225) were used to obtain the resident population numbers and age distribution in the outbreak area ( 20 ). Mosquito Trapping A total of 8–13 overnight mosquito traps were placed at Point Lonsdale on 22 occasions from December 2004 through January 2007. Adult mosquito sampling was conducted with CO2-baited miniature light traps ( 21 ). Traps were 2-L, cylindrical, insulated containers designed to hold CO2 pellets that continuously produce CO2, which then diffuses through holes in the bottom of the container. A small electric light and fan at the base of the container deflected attracted mosquitoes into a holding container. The traps were set before dusk and then retrieved several hours after dawn the next morning. The catches were transported to Primary Industries Research in Attwood, Victoria, where they were counted, sorted, and pooled by sex and species. Mosquito species were identified by using the key of Russell ( 22 ). All captured mosquitoes were tested except in February–March 2005 and again in October 2005 when recent rains led to large spikes in mosquito numbers. Screening of Mosquitoes by PCR DNA was extracted from pools of 55 years of age than in those 1 pool was positive; otherwise uncorrected. Thirty-five IS2404-positive pools did not contain IS2606 and KR. However, the cycle threshold (Ct) values for IS2404 were lower for those pools that did have IS2606 and KR, which suggested that failure to detect KR and IS2606 in some pools was caused by low DNA concentration, rather than lack of specificity for M. ulcerans. This finding is consistent with known differences in copy number per cell of targets used for PCR screening and confirmation ( 23 ). A total of 124 pools of mosquitoes that were negative for IS2404 by PCR were screened with probes for KR and IS2606. None were positive, which indicated that these 2 loci are consistently linked to IS2404 and do not occur independently. The MLE (bias corrected) for all mosquitoes over the entire testing period at Point Lonsdale was 4.3 M. ulcerans PCR-positive mosquitoes/1,000 tested (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.2–5.6). However, mosquito numbers varied widely between trappings, as did proportions of positive pools. On 1 occasion, only 269 mosquitoes were trapped, but 6 of the pools were positive (December 2005; MLE 22.4, 95% CI 10.3–50.3). Most PCR-positive pools had relatively high Ct values for IS2404 PCR, which indicated low numbers of contaminating M. ulcerans cells. With reference to spiking experiments under laboratory conditions, ≈10–100 M. ulcerans were likely to have been present per contaminated mosquito ( 23 ). Mosquito Numbers, Proportion PCR Positive, and Reporting of BU Trapping was conducted at Point Lonsdale between December 2004 and January 2007. Mosquito numbers varied during the period, and traps were not set when local reports suggested low mosquito numbers (Appendix Figure). There appeared to be a qualitative relationship between PCR-positive mosquitoes in spring and summer (September–February) and reporting of new cases of human disease in autumn and winter (March–August). The exposure-to-reporting interval is typically longer than the actual incubation period because patients do not always seek medical assistance immediately and doctors do not always diagnose BU when a patient is first seen ( 28 ). Mosquitoes Caught at Other Locations in Victoria To test that the observed association between M. ulcerans and mosquitoes only occurs in outbreak areas, we tested 3,385 mosquitoes from several inhabited areas with lower BU endemicity than Point Lonsdale. From October 2005 through January 2007, a total of 2,119 mosquitoes (89% Ae. camptorhynchus) were trapped in townships on the Bellarine Peninsula where 30 cases of BU have been reported in the past 5 years; 3 pools of Ae. camptorhynchus were positive by IS2404 PCR. In January and June 2006, a total of 795 mosquitoes (82% Ae. camptorhynchus) were trapped in the Bass Coast Shire, which includes Phillip Island, a region that has previously been endemic for M. ulcerans ( 14 ) but has only reported 2 cases in the past 5 years. One pool of Ae. notoscriptus was positive for IS2404. From February through April 2006, 471 mosquitoes were captured from inhabited areas in northern and central Victoria where no human cases of M. ulcerans have been reported. Ten different species were trapped, including 226 Ae. camptorhynchus (48%), but all pools were negative for IS2404. When analyzed together, an association was observed between degree of endemicity and probability of trapping mosquitoes that are positive by PCR for M. ulcerans (Table 2), but this association did not show statistical significance (p = 0.07). Table 2 Relationship between cases of Buruli ulcer, mosquitoes tested, and maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) per 1,000 mosquitoes trapped in Victoria, Australia, and tested by PCR for insertion sequence IS2404 of Mycobacterium ulcerans* Region No. cases past 5 y No. mosquitoes tested (% Aedes camptorhynchus)† No. pools positive MLE (95% CI) Point Lonsdale 79 11,504 (91.8) 48 4.2 (3.08–5.53) Bellarine Peninsula (excluding Point Lonsdale) 30 2,119 (88.7) 3 1.42 (0.37–3.85) Bass coast Shire including Phillip Island 2 795 (82.1) 1 1.25 (0.07–6.03) Central and northern Victoria (Mildura, Swan Hill, Moira, Shepparton) 0 471 (48.0) 0 0 (0–7.34) Total 111 14,889 (89.4) 52 3.57 (2.70–4.64) *MLE bias was corrected when >1 pool was positive, otherwise uncorrected. CI, confidence interval
†p value = 0.07 (χ2: 4 × 2 table; pools positive/no. tested). Discussion To our knowledge, the outbreak of BU in Point Lonsdale is the largest ever recorded in Australia and has now caused more than twice as many cases as the well-described outbreak at Phillip Island a decade earlier ( 16 , 29 ). A striking feature of both outbreaks is their intensely localized nature. We identified 79 cases that were epidemiologically linked to Point Lonsdale and the western edges of Queenscliff, but the town of Queenscliff, only 4 km to the east along the same beach, has so far remained disease free. The cumulative attack rate for both towns is estimated to be 1.2% of the resident population, but it could be up to twice as high if only the population of Point Lonsdale, where all transmission appears to have occurred, were considered. Although Queenscliff remains unaffected, the nearby towns of Barwon Heads and Ocean Grove, ≈12 km west of Point Lonsdale, began reporting their first cases in 2005. The first case at Point Lonsdale was reported in January 2002. In 2004, the outbreak increased in intensity and began to involve visitors as well as residents, which suggested that environmental contamination with M. ulcerans has steadily increased over 5 years. Among local residents, we found a higher attack rate in the elderly, with 3.7% of residents of Point Lonsdale/Queenscliff >75 years of age with BU. The reasons for this age distribution are not known, but increasing risk with age could be caused by an age-related immune defect or an unrecognized behavioral factor. Among visitors, there was a pronounced bimodal age distribution, which probably represents a skewing of the exposed population (e.g., young children going to stay with their retired grandparents over the summer while their parents stayed at work) but may also reflect increased susceptibility in young persons. This bimodal pattern, which included increased incidence in young persons and the elderly, has also been reported in Africa ( 30 ). During our investigations at Point Lonsdale, we focused initially on several marshy areas and obtained positive PCR results for plant material from 2 small ornamental lakes and soil from storm water drains ( 23 ). However, case-patients did not report direct contact with these lakes or drains (these sources of water are not used for swimming or wading). Thus, how people were exposed is not clear. In an outbreak in Phillip Island, many cases were clustered around a newly formed wetland and a golf course irrigation system, and we proposed transmission from these sites by aerosol ( 16 , 29 ). However, this hypothesis may not be supported by our new evidence, which suggests that M. ulcerans may not be free-living in the environment but may have adapted to specific niches within aquatic environments, including salivary glands of some insects. Thus, we investigated whether M. ulcerans could be detected in mosquitoes, which had been reported in higher than usual numbers at Point Lonsdale. We also investigated behavior in a case-control study (the subject of a separate report), which found that being bitten by mosquitoes increased the odds of having BU ( 31 ). A total of 14,889 mosquitoes obtained over a 25-month period (11,504 from Point Lonsdale) were tested for M. ulcerans by using a highly sensitive and specific real-time PCR ( 23 ). We used PCR because direct culture of M. ulcerans from the environment is extremely difficult and was only achieved when IS2404 PCR screening of environmental samples accurately directed researchers to specific microenvironments that include water insects and aquatic plants ( 32 ). Although IS2404, IS2606, and the mycolactone-producing virulence plasmid have been detected in mycobacteria other than M. ulcerans ( 33 – 35 ), identification of these targets in expected relative proportions and the VNTR locus 9 sequence identical to that of the outbreak strain in a subset of mosquito pools with sufficiently high DNA concentrations confirms that we identified the outbreak strain ( 23 ). We also demonstrated that over a 2-year cycle at Point Lonsdale absolute numbers of mosquitoes and PCR-positive mosquitoes increased in spring and summer followed by a cluster of new human cases in autumn and winter. This pattern is consistent with recent point estimates that suggest the incubation period for BU in Australia is 3–7 months (2 cases) ( 36 ) and 1–4 months (3 cases) ( 28 ), and that an additional 1–6 weeks may elapse before cases are diagnosed and reported ( 28 ). The predominant species trapped was Ae. camptorhynchus; however, identification of M. ulcerans in 4 other species suggests that M. ulcerans contamination of mosquitoes is not species specific. Ae. camptorhynchus is a salt marsh species, an aggressive biter, and a major pest in coastal areas of southeastern Australia that has been linked to transmission of Ross River virus. The mosquito appears in large numbers after rain as minimum temperatures begin to increase, with a lag time of ≈1 month ( 37 ). Of the other species from which at least 1 PCR-positive pool was identified, An. annulipes and Cq. linealis are fresh water species ( 38 ). Ae. notoscriptus is a peridomestic species that breeds in containers (e.g., in roof gutters) ( 39 ), can transmit dog hookworm, and has a limited flight range (e.g., <200 m) ( 40 ). In contrast, Cx. australicus may have a flight range of many kilometers ( 41 ). A limited number of other biting or aquatic insects were also tested and none were positive for M. ulcerans. However, larger numbers must be screened before it can be concluded that they do not transmit M. ulcerans. Our results do not demonstrate viability or transmissibility of M. ulcerans at the time mosquitoes were captured, and the method we used does not answer questions about location of M. ulcerans within the insect. Because M. ulcerans is an environmental pathogen, PCR-positive mosquitoes may only be indicators of its presence in the environment and not linked to transmission. The Ct values obtained for mosquito pools suggest that only 10–100 organisms were present per positive pool, which is more consistent with organisms being acquired on outer surfaces of mosquitoes when resting or feeding in storm water drains ( 23 ), rather than mosquitoes being a true productive reservoir and vector. However, if some bacterial cells were present on the proboscis, they could have been injected beneath the keratin layer during feeding. Although the inoculum size required to cause a human infection is unknown, the long incubation period suggests a low initial inoculum. Our findings do not demonstrate that mosquitoes are responsible for transmission, but this possibility should be investigated. Studies are underway to artificially infect mosquito larvae with M. ulcerans and initiate infection in a mouse model, as has been conducted with naucorids ( 9 ). Although our findings may not apply to the situation in Africa, the close genetic relationship of Australian isolates of M. ulcerans with strains from humans with BU in Africa ( 35 ) should encourage similar search on M. ulcerans in mosquitoes from the primary BU-endemic regions of West Africa. We have shown that a small proportion of mosquitoes of 5 species captured in a BU-endemic area during an intense human outbreak of BU can carry M. ulcerans; PCR-positive mosquitoes are likely present at times of peak transmission and mosquitoes captured in areas with few human cases appear less likely to be positive for M. ulcerans. We hypothesize that transmission by mosquitoes offers a partial explanation for the outbreak at Point Lonsdale and possibly at other sites in southeastern Australia. Supplementary Material Appendix Figure Relationship between reporting of cases of Buruli ulcer (BU) and mosquitoes tested from Point Lonsdale, Australia, December 2004-January 2007. Increased mosquito activity in spring and summer (September-February) appears to be followed by a wave of new reports in autumn and winter (March-August). A) No. mosquitoes tested by month at Point Lonsdale (traps were not set when local reports suggested low mosquito activity). B) Proportion of tested mosquitoes positive by PCR for Mycobacterium ulcerans by month. C) No. of new cases of BU epidemiologically linked to Point Lonsdale by month.
          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans in environmental samples during an outbreak of ulcerative disease.

          Mycobacterium ulcerans is an environmental bacterium which causes chronic skin ulcers. Despite significant epidemiological evidence to suggest that water is the source of infection, the organism has never been identified in the environment. Environmental water samples were collected from a small town in which an outbreak of 29 cases had occurred in a 3-year period. These were examined by mycobacterial culture and PCR amplification. Similar to previous studies, M. ulcerans was not cultured from the water samples. However, five samples were positive for M. ulcerans by PCR. These samples were collected from a swamp and a golf course irrigation system within the outbreak area. This is the first time that M. ulcerans has been demonstrated to be present in the environment and supports the postulated epidemiology of disease due to this organism.

            Author and article information

            [1 ]Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
            [2 ]Victorian Department of Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
            [3 ]Victorian Infectious Disease References Laboratory (VIDRL), North Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
            [4 ]World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Mycobacterium ulcerans (Western Pacific Region), VIDRL, North Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
            [5 ]Department of Medicine, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
            [6 ]Department of Microbiology & Immunology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
            University of California San Diego School of Medicine, United States of America
            Author notes

            The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

            Conceived and designed the experiments: JAT CJL JAMF SB PDRJ. Performed the experiments: JAT SB. Analyzed the data: JAT CJL JAMF SB PDRJ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JAT CJL JAMF SB PDRJ. Wrote the paper: JAT CJL JAMF SB PDRJ.

            Role: Editor
            PLoS Negl Trop Dis
            PLoS Negl Trop Dis
            PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
            Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
            October 2013
            3 October 2013
            : 7
            : 10

            This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

            Pages: 6
            This project was supported by a Public Health Research Grant from Department of Health Victoria to PDRJ. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
            Research Article

            Infectious disease & Microbiology


            Comment on this article