1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      100 years of influenza research seen through the lens of Covid-19

      brief-report
      ,
      Mucosal Immunology
      Nature Publishing Group US

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          It is perhaps a strange coincidence that in this issue of Mucosal Immunology a review entitled “Seasonal and pandemic influenza: 100 years of progress, still much to learn” is being published, while at the same time another global pandemic, this time caused by a novel coronavirus infection SARS-CoV-2, also known as Covid-19, spreads around the globe. Dunning et al. provide a comprehensive overview of current knowledge regarding seasonal influenza, with a detailed description on how the immunology of influenza has shaped the current standard of therapy and prevention. 1 This review was written in the period before the world was confronted with the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, which for many might feel a long time ago, though in reality is only 2–3 months in the past. We now live in a very different world where a novel virus has redefined how we experience essential elements of modern life ranging from work and education to travel and recreation. This has all arisen because of a rapidly spreading virus causing major morbidity and mortality, primarily due to severe pneumonia and development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). 2 Observed through the contemporary lens of covid-19, this review becomes an even more interesting and important piece of work, integrating knowledge accumulated over 100 years of research in epidemiology, global and public health, as well as evolutionary biology and immunology. These constitute the scientific rationale behind our effective current program of preventive and treatment strategies against (seasonal) influenza. It also forms a template for the knowledge, we must rapidly acquire to have similar success in controlling the novel SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. The first lesson that can be distilled from this review is how difficult it still is to fully prevent seasonal influenza. With the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the clock has just started to tick, and this review highlights that we need to rapidly learn about this new virus, simultaneously using our experience with previous outbreaks including influenza. The higher R0 (reproduction number) and fatality associated with this virus however emphasize the need to learn quickly. 3 The current review starts by describing the devastating effect of the influenza pandemic that raged the globe 100 years ago, with an estimated 675,000 people dying in the USA alone. 4 The authors highlight how the Spanish flu pandemic caused the death of a famous artist Egon Schiele and his family. Covid-19 is already exerting a similar toll. In an era of interdisciplinary endeavor, the author, cartographer and visual artist Tim Robinson has been among the early casualties of Covid-19, dying in London a few days after the death of his wife. It is worth reflecting how ironic it is that an artist defined by his connection with empty landscapes should fall victim to a pandemic for which one of our main control measures is social distancing. The review then addresses some of the key features of influenza pathogenesis. It provides a state-of-the-art resume of innate and adaptive immune responses but also highlights that important knowledge gaps remain. After 100 years of research important insights have helped us to understand how viruses evolve within the human and animal populations at geographical scale, under the selective pressure of immune responses and how differences in immune responses alter severity of disease. This knowledge has helped us to develop antiviral therapies and vaccination strategies. 1 Yet we still face challenges identifying those patients who develop critical illness and bacterial super-infection as the authors high-light. There can also be surprises though: the author’s own data shows that patients with asthma were less likely to present with severe pulmonary or systemic disease when exposed to H1N1pdm09. 1 When faced with a brand new virus like SARS-CoV-2 rapidly emerging in the human population, we have a much more limited knowledge base to work with, leaving us at a significant disadvantage. We rapidly must understand the origin, genetic variation and epidemiological characteristics of the new virus. This includes knowledge on mode of transmission, incubation period, window of transmission, and reproductive number, to ensure an effective public health response and to put in place appropriate infection control measures. As a consequence, most nations, supported by organizations like WHO and GOARN, have emergency response plans in place that can deal with emerging major outbreaks, including pandemic influenza and other emerging respiratory viruses (https://extranet.who.int/goarn/). In contrast to the array of data succinctly summarized by the authors on influenza, we lack comparable understanding for Covid-19. However, what we already have learned is the importance of the human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2) as the entry receptor for SARS-CoV-2. 5 Based on genetic information researchers have identified that the biochemical and structural properties of SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) show an even higher hACE2-binding affinity compared to SARS-CoV, 6 which might help to explain the higher transmission rates and infectivity. The paucity of post-mortem data and the infectivity of invasive procedures such as bronchoscopies are two barriers to acquiring information, but despite many hurdles, information is rapidly accumulating. We still know little about immunity in mild disease, including correlates of effective immunity such as neutralizing antibody, though preliminary data show that antibody responses kick in early in the disease process, with IgA and IgM detectable within 5 days after start of symptoms. 7 In addition, first evidence has been obtained suggesting antibodies from recovered cases are able to neutralize viral entry, and protect against re-infection. 5 Interestingly, in more severe cases lymphopenia is profound and associated with severity and mortality, which is likely a consequence of activation of apoptosis. One early transcriptomic analysis has suggested activation of p53 signaling pathways, but other pathways are likely to be involved as well. 8 In the subset of patients with severe disease accompanied by respiratory failure or acute respiratory distress syndrome, a small numbers of post-mortem studies have also shown increased numbers of Th17 cells and activated CD8+ T-cells with expression of granzymes and perforin. 9 There is also evidence of prominent macrophage activation in a subset of patients, with a high level of ferritin and IL-6. In some, this may be extreme, resembling macrophage activation syndrome, which frequently has a viral trigger, but this time associated with a merely mucosal rather than systemic immune activation. 10 We recognize many of those with severe disease have medical comorbidity, in particular hypertension or advanced age, but we need to understand how these conditions influence susceptibility and we need to analyze genetic studies to help explain the reason why otherwise healthy individuals can have a severe outcome including death. Some of the patterns of dysregulated inflammation and alterations in immune cell populations are similar to those in sepsis. This raises the possibility that there is a role for co-infection or microbiota-driven inflammation in severity of disease. Co-infections contribute significantly to morbidity and mortality in influenza. 1 Early data from China suggested co-infection in as many as 50% of deceased SARS-CoV-2 patients, 10 while other reports in milder disease suggest co-infection in 10% or less. Details on pathogens associated with co-infection are limited, but Chen et al. described complex infections with a combination of Gram-negative pathogens identified, as well as fungi in a few cases. 2 In addition to consequences for antimicrobial selection when required, learning about these patterns will be important in promoting preventive strategies such as vaccination. Bacterial vaccines, specifically those directed against the pneumococcus, are a cornerstone of prevention of influenza-related morbidity and mortality especially in vulnerable groups, at times of seasonal or pandemic influenza. 1 Research is needed to establish if management of (mixed) bacterial infections over the course of disease is also important for successful treatment of Covid-19, so we can consider these alternative preventive strategies. Management of seasonal influenza has benefitted greatly from the development of antiviral therapies as the authors summarize in their review. 1 For Covid-19, initial strategies are exploring the efficacy of antivirals, which have been developed in other settings and repurposed anti-inflammatory or immune modulating drugs. In parallel, many groups throughout the world have embarked on the challenging task of rapidly developing a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, a process that is dramatically accelerated by the use of novel technologies designed to accelerate development of vaccines. 11 Challenges will remain though, regarding how immunogenic the epitopes derived from the spike proteins of SARS-COV-2 are, how well how epitope-specific antibodies neutralize virus, how long-lasting acquired immunity is and whether there is any risk of antibody-dependent enhancement of disease, as has been demonstrated for SARS and other coronaviruses. 12 It will take time to ensure safety and efficacy, as well as to scale up vaccine production for a global demand. A coordinated multisector effort has been put into place at a pace and depth never observed before. But it remains to be seen whether this virus becomes endemic, and whether SARS-CoV-2 will be the last coronavirus that jumps from undefined intermediate hosts to man. History suggests that the battle against SARS-CoV-2 and related coronaviruses is still in its infancy. Once this new Coronavirus outbreak has been overcome, we may come to discover we have fought only one battle not the entire war. We must learn lessons not only about preparedness, but also about specifics of immunity to this virus, and more generally about mechanisms underpinning severe lung infection, including the role of co-infection and immune dysregulation. This will help to effectively combat the ongoing threat of pandemic respiratory viruses. We need to be better prepared next time, and whatever it takes, and how much time passes before the next pandemic arrives, we must not let our guard down. We must continue to learn from past and future influenza outbreaks, as well as novel respiratory virus pandemics such as covid-19. Each of these teach us important lessons. This will help us prepare more effectively for the next pandemic respiratory virus. It is certain they will come, even though we cannot predict when and where they will emerge.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China

          Summary Background A recent cluster of pneumonia cases in Wuhan, China, was caused by a novel betacoronavirus, the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). We report the epidemiological, clinical, laboratory, and radiological characteristics and treatment and clinical outcomes of these patients. Methods All patients with suspected 2019-nCoV were admitted to a designated hospital in Wuhan. We prospectively collected and analysed data on patients with laboratory-confirmed 2019-nCoV infection by real-time RT-PCR and next-generation sequencing. Data were obtained with standardised data collection forms shared by WHO and the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium from electronic medical records. Researchers also directly communicated with patients or their families to ascertain epidemiological and symptom data. Outcomes were also compared between patients who had been admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and those who had not. Findings By Jan 2, 2020, 41 admitted hospital patients had been identified as having laboratory-confirmed 2019-nCoV infection. Most of the infected patients were men (30 [73%] of 41); less than half had underlying diseases (13 [32%]), including diabetes (eight [20%]), hypertension (six [15%]), and cardiovascular disease (six [15%]). Median age was 49·0 years (IQR 41·0–58·0). 27 (66%) of 41 patients had been exposed to Huanan seafood market. One family cluster was found. Common symptoms at onset of illness were fever (40 [98%] of 41 patients), cough (31 [76%]), and myalgia or fatigue (18 [44%]); less common symptoms were sputum production (11 [28%] of 39), headache (three [8%] of 38), haemoptysis (two [5%] of 39), and diarrhoea (one [3%] of 38). Dyspnoea developed in 22 (55%) of 40 patients (median time from illness onset to dyspnoea 8·0 days [IQR 5·0–13·0]). 26 (63%) of 41 patients had lymphopenia. All 41 patients had pneumonia with abnormal findings on chest CT. Complications included acute respiratory distress syndrome (12 [29%]), RNAaemia (six [15%]), acute cardiac injury (five [12%]) and secondary infection (four [10%]). 13 (32%) patients were admitted to an ICU and six (15%) died. Compared with non-ICU patients, ICU patients had higher plasma levels of IL2, IL7, IL10, GSCF, IP10, MCP1, MIP1A, and TNFα. Interpretation The 2019-nCoV infection caused clusters of severe respiratory illness similar to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and was associated with ICU admission and high mortality. Major gaps in our knowledge of the origin, epidemiology, duration of human transmission, and clinical spectrum of disease need fulfilment by future studies. Funding Ministry of Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Natural Science Foundation of China, and Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor

            Summary The recent emergence of the novel, pathogenic SARS-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in China and its rapid national and international spread pose a global health emergency. Cell entry of coronaviruses depends on binding of the viral spike (S) proteins to cellular receptors and on S protein priming by host cell proteases. Unravelling which cellular factors are used by SARS-CoV-2 for entry might provide insights into viral transmission and reveal therapeutic targets. Here, we demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 uses the SARS-CoV receptor ACE2 for entry and the serine protease TMPRSS2 for S protein priming. A TMPRSS2 inhibitor approved for clinical use blocked entry and might constitute a treatment option. Finally, we show that the sera from convalescent SARS patients cross-neutralized SARS-2-S-driven entry. Our results reveal important commonalities between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV infection and identify a potential target for antiviral intervention.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study

              Summary Background In December, 2019, a pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) emerged in Wuhan, China. We aimed to further clarify the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 2019-nCoV pneumonia. Methods In this retrospective, single-centre study, we included all confirmed cases of 2019-nCoV in Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital from Jan 1 to Jan 20, 2020. Cases were confirmed by real-time RT-PCR and were analysed for epidemiological, demographic, clinical, and radiological features and laboratory data. Outcomes were followed up until Jan 25, 2020. Findings Of the 99 patients with 2019-nCoV pneumonia, 49 (49%) had a history of exposure to the Huanan seafood market. The average age of the patients was 55·5 years (SD 13·1), including 67 men and 32 women. 2019-nCoV was detected in all patients by real-time RT-PCR. 50 (51%) patients had chronic diseases. Patients had clinical manifestations of fever (82 [83%] patients), cough (81 [82%] patients), shortness of breath (31 [31%] patients), muscle ache (11 [11%] patients), confusion (nine [9%] patients), headache (eight [8%] patients), sore throat (five [5%] patients), rhinorrhoea (four [4%] patients), chest pain (two [2%] patients), diarrhoea (two [2%] patients), and nausea and vomiting (one [1%] patient). According to imaging examination, 74 (75%) patients showed bilateral pneumonia, 14 (14%) patients showed multiple mottling and ground-glass opacity, and one (1%) patient had pneumothorax. 17 (17%) patients developed acute respiratory distress syndrome and, among them, 11 (11%) patients worsened in a short period of time and died of multiple organ failure. Interpretation The 2019-nCoV infection was of clustering onset, is more likely to affect older males with comorbidities, and can result in severe and even fatal respiratory diseases such as acute respiratory distress syndrome. In general, characteristics of patients who died were in line with the MuLBSTA score, an early warning model for predicting mortality in viral pneumonia. Further investigation is needed to explore the applicability of the MuLBSTA score in predicting the risk of mortality in 2019-nCoV infection. Funding National Key R&D Program of China.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                d.bogaert@ed.ac.uk
                Journal
                Mucosal Immunol
                Mucosal Immunol
                Mucosal Immunology
                Nature Publishing Group US (New York )
                1933-0219
                1935-3456
                1 May 2020
                : 1-2
                Affiliations
                ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7988, GRID grid.4305.2, Center for Inflammation Research, , University of Edinburgh, ; Edinburgh, UK
                Article
                291
                10.1038/s41385-020-0291-9
                7194027
                31719642
                d88c638b-b658-4118-b8fc-361aef2f597e
                © Society for Mucosal Immunology 2020

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 16 April 2020
                : 16 April 2020
                Categories
                Comment

                Immunology
                Immunology

                Comments

                Comment on this article