4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Comparison of alum-absorbed or non-alum-absorbed oil emulsion vaccines containing either pilate or non-pilate Bacteroides nodosus cells in inducing and maintaining resistance of sheep to experimental foot rot

      ,
      Research in Veterinary Science
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Highly pilate (P) or non-pilate (NP) cells of Bacteroides nodosus were compounded into oil emulsion (O) either with or without prior absorption onto alum (A). The abilities of these four preparations (referred to as PAO, NPAO, PO and NPO vaccines) to stimulate antibody production and to protect sheep from foot rot were compared. Two injections of PAO vaccine protected sheep against homologous challenge 12 weeks after the second dose by PO, NPO and NPAO vaccines were less effective. Sheep were protected against homologous challenge for 14 weeks after a single dose of PAO vaccine and for 22 weeks after three doses; an ameliorative effect was still evident 40 weeks after the third dose. Protection against challenge with two heterologous strains was demonstrated at six weeks after three doses of vaccine. A numerical system of scoring the lesions also confirmed that foot rot in vaccinated sheep challenged outside the 'protective' period of the vaccine was somewhat less severe than in controls. PAO vaccine induced much higher and more persistent titres of agglutinins than the other vaccines tested. There was a relationship between agglutinin titres and resistance to homologous challenge.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Research in Veterinary Science
          Research in Veterinary Science
          Elsevier BV
          00345288
          January 1981
          January 1981
          : 30
          : 1
          : 32-37
          Article
          10.1016/S0034-5288(18)32603-1
          6113626
          d899d235-8dbe-48c2-b0ea-745260031666
          © 1981

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article