11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Antivirals and antiviral strategies

      review-article
      Nature Reviews. Microbiology
      Nature Publishing Group UK

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          • In this article, the usefulness, or potential usefulness, of the currently licensed antiviral drugs and those in clinical or preclinical development is evaluated. The main conclusions are:

          • For the treatment of polyomavirus, papillomavirus, adenovirus and poxvirus infections, the acyclic nucleoside phosphonates such as cidofovir have the greatest potential.

          • For the treatment of HSV and VZV infections, (val)acyclovir, famciclovir and brivudin are important.

          • For the treatment of CMV infections, (val)ganciclovir, cidofovir and foscarnet are the most promising.

          • Ribavirin is proposed for the treatment of (−)RNA virus (such as arenavirus and bunyavirus) infections, whereas IFN and IFN inducers are envisaged for the treatment of (+)RNA virus infections, particularly picornavirus (for example, coxsackie B) and togavirus (for example, Western, Eastern and Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus) infections.

          • For the treatment of HCV infections, pegylated IFN, in combination with ribavirin, is currently recommended, although compounds targeted at the HCV protease and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase have also been developed.

          • For the therapy and prophylaxis of influenza virus infections, the neuraminidase inhibitors zanamivir and oseltamivir are the current drugs of choice.

          • Among the paramyxoviruses, human metapneumovirus (hMPV) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) are the viruses for which antiviral therapy is most required. Although ribavirin is available for the treatment of RSV infections, it is not ideal, and therefore, new compounds are required for the treatment of hMPV and RSV infections.

          • A plethora of 'old' and 'new' compounds are available or are being developed for the treatment of HIV infections. Multiple drug regimens might be beneficial for HIV treatment.

          • For other virus infections —rotavirus, and Ebola, Marburg and other haemorrhagic virus infections — the choice of potential antiviral agents is rather limited, however, SAH hydrolase inhibitors such as 3-deazaneplanocin A are currently the most promising.

          Supplementary information

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1038/nrmicro975) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Abstract

          In recent years, the demand for new antiviral strategies has increased markedly. There are many contributing factors to this increased demand, including the ever-increasing prevalence of chronic viral infections such as HIV and hepatitis B and C, and the emergence of new viruses such as the SARS coronavirus. The potential danger of haemorrhagic fever viruses and eradicated viruses such as variola virus being used as bioterrorist weapons has also increased the profile of antiviral drug discovery. Here, the virus infections for which antiviral therapy is needed and the compounds that are available, or are being developed, for the treatment of these infections are described.

          Supplementary information

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1038/nrmicro975) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references99

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Identification of a Novel Coronavirus in Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome

          The severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) has recently been identified as a new clinical entity. SARS is thought to be caused by an unknown infectious agent. Clinical specimens from patients with SARS were searched for unknown viruses with the use of cell cultures and molecular techniques. A novel coronavirus was identified in patients with SARS. The virus was isolated in cell culture, and a sequence 300 nucleotides in length was obtained by a polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR)-based random-amplification procedure. Genetic characterization indicated that the virus is only distantly related to known coronaviruses (identical in 50 to 60 percent of the nucleotide sequence). On the basis of the obtained sequence, conventional and real-time PCR assays for specific and sensitive detection of the novel virus were established. Virus was detected in a variety of clinical specimens from patients with SARS but not in controls. High concentrations of viral RNA of up to 100 million molecules per milliliter were found in sputum. Viral RNA was also detected at extremely low concentrations in plasma during the acute phase and in feces during the late convalescent phase. Infected patients showed seroconversion on the Vero cells in which the virus was isolated. The novel coronavirus might have a role in causing SARS. Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome.

            A worldwide outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) has been associated with exposures originating from a single ill health care worker from Guangdong Province, China. We conducted studies to identify the etiologic agent of this outbreak. We received clinical specimens from patients in seven countries and tested them, using virus-isolation techniques, electron-microscopical and histologic studies, and molecular and serologic assays, in an attempt to identify a wide range of potential pathogens. None of the previously described respiratory pathogens were consistently identified. However, a novel coronavirus was isolated from patients who met the case definition of SARS. Cytopathological features were noted in Vero E6 cells inoculated with a throat-swab specimen. Electron-microscopical examination revealed ultrastructural features characteristic of coronaviruses. Immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence staining revealed reactivity with group I coronavirus polyclonal antibodies. Consensus coronavirus primers designed to amplify a fragment of the polymerase gene by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were used to obtain a sequence that clearly identified the isolate as a unique coronavirus only distantly related to previously sequenced coronaviruses. With specific diagnostic RT-PCR primers we identified several identical nucleotide sequences in 12 patients from several locations, a finding consistent with a point-source outbreak. Indirect fluorescence antibody tests and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays made with the new isolate have been used to demonstrate a virus-specific serologic response. This virus may never before have circulated in the U.S. population. A novel coronavirus is associated with this outbreak, and the evidence indicates that this virus has an etiologic role in SARS. Because of the death of Dr. Carlo Urbani, we propose that our first isolate be named the Urbani strain of SARS-associated coronavirus. Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Coronavirus main proteinase (3CLpro) structure: basis for design of anti-SARS drugs.

              A novel coronavirus has been identified as the causative agent of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). The viral main proteinase (Mpro, also called 3CLpro), which controls the activities of the coronavirus replication complex, is an attractive target for therapy. We determined crystal structures for human coronavirus (strain 229E) Mpro and for an inhibitor complex of porcine coronavirus [transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV)] Mpro, and we constructed a homology model for SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV) Mpro. The structures reveal a remarkable degree of conservation of the substrate-binding sites, which is further supported by recombinant SARS-CoV Mpro-mediated cleavage of a TGEV Mpro substrate. Molecular modeling suggests that available rhinovirus 3Cpro inhibitors may be modified to make them useful for treating SARS.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                erik.declercq@rega.kuleuven.ac.be
                Journal
                Nat Rev Microbiol
                Nat. Rev. Microbiol
                Nature Reviews. Microbiology
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                1740-1526
                1740-1534
                2004
                : 2
                : 9
                : 704-720
                Affiliations
                GRID grid.5596.f, ISNI 0000 0001 0668 7884, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, ; Leuven, B-3000 Belgium
                Article
                BFnrmicro975
                10.1038/nrmicro975
                7097272
                15372081
                d8a1f551-4fb8-4eff-9d03-466ca1394d8d
                © Nature Publishing Group 2004

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Limited 2004

                Comments

                Comment on this article