16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mesopredator Management: Effects of Red Fox Control on the Abundance, Diet and Use of Space by Feral Cats

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Apex predators are subject to lethal control in many parts of the world to minimize their impacts on human industries and livelihoods. Diverse communities of smaller predators—mesopredators—often remain after apex predator removal. Despite concern that these mesopredators may be 'released' in the absence of the apex predator and exert negative effects on each other and on co-occurring prey, these interactions have been little studied. Here, we investigate the potential effects of competition and intraguild predation between red foxes ( Vulpes vulpes) and feral cats ( Felis catus) in south-eastern Australia where the apex predator, the dingo ( Canis dingo), has been extirpated by humans. We predicted that the larger fox would dominate the cat in encounters, and used a fox-removal experiment to assess whether foxes affect cat abundance, diet, home-range and habitat use. Our results provide little indication that intraguild predation occurred or that cats responded numerically to the fox removal, but suggest that the fox affects some aspects of cat resource use. In particular, where foxes were removed cats increased their consumption of invertebrates and carrion, decreased their home range size and foraged more in open habitats. Fox control takes place over large areas of Australia to protect threatened native species and agricultural interests. Our results suggest that fox control programmes could lead to changes in the way that cats interact with co-occurring prey, and that some prey may become more vulnerable to cat predation in open habitats after foxes have been removed. Moreover, with intensive and more sustained fox control it is possible that cats could respond numerically and alter their behaviour in different ways to those documented herein. Such outcomes need to be considered when estimating the indirect impacts of fox control. We conclude that novel approaches are urgently required to control invasive mesopredators at the same time, especially in areas where apex predators are absent.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Predator interactions, mesopredator release and biodiversity conservation.

          There is growing recognition of the important roles played by predators in regulating ecosystems and sustaining biodiversity. Much attention has focused on the consequences of predator-regulation of herbivore populations, and associated trophic cascades. However apex predators may also control smaller 'mesopredators' through intraguild interactions. Removal of apex predators can result in changes to intraguild interactions and outbreaks of mesopredators ('mesopredator release'), leading in turn to increased predation on smaller prey. Here we provide a review and synthesis of studies of predator interactions, mesopredator release and their impacts on biodiversity. Mesopredator suppression by apex predators is widespread geographically and taxonomically. Apex predators suppress mesopredators both by killing them, or instilling fear, which motivates changes in behaviour and habitat use that limit mesopredator distribution and abundance. Changes in the abundance of apex predators may have disproportionate (up to fourfold) effects on mesopredator abundance. Outcomes of interactions between predators may however vary with resource availability, habitat complexity and the complexity of predator communities. There is potential for the restoration of apex predators to have benefits for biodiversity conservation through moderation of the impacts of mesopredators on their prey, but this requires a whole-ecosystem view to avoid unforeseen negative effects. 'Nothing has changed since I began. My eye has permitted no change. I am going to keep things like this.' From 'Hawk Roosting', by Ted Hughes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Top predators as biodiversity regulators: the dingo Canis lupus dingo as a case study.

            Top-order predators often have positive effects on biological diversity owing to their key functional roles in regulating trophic cascades and other ecological processes. Their loss has been identified as a major factor contributing to the decline of biodiversity in both aquatic and terrestrial systems. Consequently, restoring and maintaining the ecological function of top predators is a critical global imperative. Here we review studies of the ecological effects of the dingo Canis lupus dingo, Australia's largest land predator, using this as a case study to explore the influence of a top predator on biodiversity at a continental scale. The dingo was introduced to Australia by people at least 3500 years ago and has an ambiguous status owing to its brief history on the continent, its adverse impacts on livestock production and its role as an ecosystem architect. A large body of research now indicates that dingoes regulate ecological cascades, particularly in arid Australia, and that the removal of dingoes results in an increase in the abundances and impacts of herbivores and invasive mesopredators, most notably the red fox Vulpes vulpes. The loss of dingoes has been linked to widespread losses of small and medium-sized native mammals, the depletion of plant biomass due to the effects of irrupting herbivore populations and increased predation rates by red foxes. We outline a suite of conceptual models to describe the effects of dingoes on vertebrate populations across different Australian environments. Finally, we discuss key issues that require consideration or warrant research before the ecological effects of dingoes can be incorporated formally into biodiversity conservation programs. © 2011 The Authors. Biological Reviews © 2011 Cambridge Philosophical Society.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Complex interactions among mammalian carnivores in Australia, and their implications for wildlife management.

              Mammalian carnivore populations are often intensively managed, either because the carnivore in question is endangered, or because it is viewed as a pest and is subjected to control measures, or both. Most management programmes treat carnivore species in isolation. However, there is a large and emerging body of evidence to demonstrate that populations of different carnivores interact with each other in a variety of complex ways. Thus, the removal or introduction of predators to or from a system can often affect other species in ways that are difficult to predict. Wildlife managers must consider such interactions when planning predator control programmes. Integrated predator control will require a greater understanding of the complex relationships between species. In many parts of the world, sympatric species of carnivores have coexisted over an evolutionary time scale so that niche differentiation has occurred, and competition is difficult to observe. Australia has experienced numerous introductions during the past 200 years, including those of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and the feral cat (Felis catus). These species now exist in sympatry with native mammalian predators, providing ecologists with the opportunity to study their interactions without the confounding effects of coevolution. Despite an increasing body of observational evidence for complex interactions among native and introduced predators in Australia, few studies have attempted to clarify these relationships experimentally, and the interactions remain largely unacknowledged. A greater understanding of these interactions would provide ecologists and wildlife managers world-wide with the ability to construct robust predictive models of carnivore communities, and to identify their broader effects on ecosystem functioning. We suggest that future research should focus on controlled and replicated predator removal or addition experiments. The dingo (Canis lupus dingo), as a likely keystone species, should be a particular focus of attention.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                9 January 2017
                2017
                : 12
                : 1
                : e0168460
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Kangaroo Island, South Australia, Australia
                [2 ]CSIRO, Lyneham, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
                [3 ]School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
                [4 ]Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America
                [5 ]School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
                [6 ]School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, The University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
                University of Alberta, CANADA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                • Conceptualization: RM AEN CRD.

                • Data curation: RM TMN AEN CRD.

                • Formal analysis: RM TMN AEN CRD.

                • Funding acquisition: CRD AEN.

                • Investigation: RM TMN AEN CRD.

                • Methodology: RM AEN CRD.

                • Project administration: RM CRD.

                • Resources: RM TMN AEN CRD.

                • Software: RM AEN CRD.

                • Supervision: CRD.

                • Validation: RM AEN CRD.

                • Visualization: RM TMN CRD.

                • Writing – original draft: RM TMN AEN CRD.

                • Writing – review & editing: RM TMN CRD.

                Article
                PONE-D-16-38907
                10.1371/journal.pone.0168460
                5222607
                28068378
                d8e70ed7-ca94-4356-b200-9fdde0797910
                © 2017 Molsher et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 6 October 2016
                : 1 December 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 0, Pages: 15
                Funding
                We gratefully acknowledge CSIRO and the Vertebrate Biocontrol CRC (now the Invasive Animals CRC) for access to the Burrendong study region and use of facilities, and Environment Australia (now the Department of the Environment and Energy) for additional funding.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Amniotes
                Mammals
                Cats
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Community Ecology
                Trophic Interactions
                Predation
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Community Ecology
                Trophic Interactions
                Predation
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Amniotes
                Mammals
                Foxes
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Community Ecology
                Trophic Interactions
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Community Ecology
                Trophic Interactions
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Experimental Organism Systems
                Animal Models
                Rabbits
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Amniotes
                Mammals
                Rabbits
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Habitats
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Animals
                Invertebrates
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Behavior
                Animal Behavior
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Zoology
                Animal Behavior
                Custom metadata
                Data are in DRYAD. Data package title: Data from: Mesopredator management: effects of red fox control on the abundance, diet and use of space by feral cats; Provisional DOI: doi: 10.5061/dryad.b08j3; Data files: Data_Molsher2016.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article