16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      First Two Years’ Response to Growth Hormone Treatment in Very Young Preterm Small for Gestational Age Children

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Growth hormone (GH) is a therapeutic option for small for gestational age (SGA) children without spontaneous catch-up. There are few reports on preterm SGA children. Prematurity is an additional risk factor for adult short stature. Aim: To describe GH efficacy in preterm SGA patients. Methods: Twenty-five preterm SGA patients, 2–4 years old, treated with GH 0.066 mg/kg/day, were compared with 14 age-matched preterm SGA historical controls. Height, weight, IGF-I, IGFBP-3, fasting glucose and insulin were measured every 6 months. Results: At start of GH treatment, mean height and weight were –2.4 and –2.4 SDS, respectively. There was a significant increment in height SDS of 1.3 and 2.1 during the 1st and the 2nd year of GH therapy, respectively. There was no significant difference between the progression of chronological and bone ages. A significant increase in IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and molar ratio was observed during GH therapy. There was no difference in glucose, insulin or HOMA-IR index. Conclusion: We showed for the first time that the height increment of preterm SGA with GH treatment is similar to that described in other studies with term SGA patients. Therefore, short-term GH treatment in a subset of preterm SGA patients between 2–4 years of age was able to promote adequate growth recovery with no excessive bone age acceleration or adverse effects on carbohydrate metabolism.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          New Ballard Score, expanded to include extremely premature infants

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Adult height after long-term, continuous growth hormone (GH) treatment in short children born small for gestational age: results of a randomized, double-blind, dose-response GH trial.

            The GH dose-response effect of long-term continuous GH treatment on adult height (AH) was evaluated in 54 short children born small for gestational age (SGA) who were participating in a randomized, double-blind, dose-response trial. Patients were randomly and blindly assigned to treatment with either 3 IU (group A) or 6 IU (group B) GH/m(2).d ( approximately 0.033 or 0.067 mg/kg.d, respectively). The mean (+/-SD) birth length was -3.6 (1.4), the age at the start of the study was 8.1 (1.9) yr, and the height SD score (SDS) at the start of the study -3.0 (0.7). Seventeen of the 54 children were partially GH deficient (stimulated GH peak, 10-20 mU/liter). Fifteen non-GH-treated, non-GH-deficient, short children born SGA, with similar inclusion criteria, served as controls [mean (+/-SD) birth length, -3.3 (1.2); age at start, 7.8 (1.7) yr; height SDS at start, -2.6 (0.5)]. GH treatment resulted in an AH above -2 SDS in 85% of the children after a mean (+/-SD) GH treatment period of 7.8 (1.7) yr. The mean (SD) AH SDS was -1.1 (0.7) for group A and -0.9 (0.8) for group B, resulting from a mean (+/-SD) gain in height SDS of 1.8 (0.7) for group A and 2.1 (0.8) for group B. No significant differences between groups A and B were found for AH SDS (mean difference, 0.3 SDS; 95% confidence interval, -0.2, 0.6; P > 0.2) and gain in height SDS (mean difference, 0.3 SDS; 95% confidence interval, -0.1, 0.7; P > 0.1). When corrected for target height, the mean corrected AH SDS was -0.2 (0.8) for group A and -0.4 (0.9) for group B. The mean (+/-SD) AH SDS of the control group [-2.3 (0.7)] was significantly lower than that of the GH-treated group (P < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis indicated the following predictive variables for AH SDS: target height SDS, height SDS, and chronological age minus bone age (years) at the start of the study. GH dose had no significant effect. In conclusion, long-term continuous GH treatment in short children born SGA without signs of persistent catch-up growth leads to a normalization of AH, even with a GH dose of 3 IU/m(2).d ( approximately 0.033 mg/kg.d).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Insulin Resistance in Short Children with Intrauterine Growth Retardation

              P L Hofman (1997)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                HRE
                Horm Res Paediatr
                10.1159/issn.1663-2818
                Hormone Research in Paediatrics
                S. Karger AG
                1663-2818
                1663-2826
                2009
                October 2009
                19 October 2009
                : 72
                : 5
                : 275-280
                Affiliations
                aPediatric Endocrinology Unit and bPediatric Neonatal Unit, Pediatrics Department, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, Santa Casa de São Paulo Faculty of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil; cPediatrics Department, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, N.Y., USA
                Article
                245929 Horm Res 2009;72:275–280
                10.1159/000245929
                19844113
                d90228e4-9fc6-4381-848f-c0b671b7a4a0
                © 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 12 August 2008
                : 31 December 2008
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 4, References: 34, Pages: 6
                Categories
                Original Paper

                Endocrinology & Diabetes,Neurology,Nutrition & Dietetics,Sexual medicine,Internal medicine,Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                Catch-up growth,Growth hormone,Preterm newborns,Small for gestational age

                Comments

                Comment on this article