5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Student Perceptions of Growth-Facilitating and Growth-Constraining Factors of Practice Placements: A Comparison between Japanese and United Kingdom Occupational Therapy Students

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study compared growth-facilitating and growth-constraining experiences of practice placements as perceived by occupational therapy students from Japan and the United Kingdom (UK). Fifteen students from Japan and 14 from the UK used a nominal group technique (NGT) to rank, individually and in groups, their subjective learning experiences during practice placements. Qualitative analysis and simple tabulation based on ranking of items obtained in the NGT were performed. Five item categories were identified from both Japanese and UK students: self-reflection, the role of supervisor, sense of responsibility, clinical knowledge and skills, and time management. Results showed that all students perceived opportunities for self-reflection and feedback from supervisors as growth facilitating and students' passive attitudes towards requirements of practice placements as growth constraining. Country-specific differences between students were observed in clinical knowledge and skills, sense of responsibility, and time management. Japanese students perceived that preparatory study led to successfully treating clients during placement, and they tended to commit to placement assignments at the expense of time outside. UK students valued working independently with a sense of responsibility but considered time-management problems within their placement hours as growth constraining. These differences can be explained by different social norms and expectations of students from Japan and the UK.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A systematic review of peer teaching and learning in clinical education.

          The purpose of this review is to provide a framework for peer teaching and learning in the clinical education of undergraduate health science students in clinical practice settings and make clear the positive and negative aspects of this teaching and learning strategy. The practice of using peers incidentally or purposefully in the clinical education of apprentice or undergraduate health science students is a well-established tradition and commonly practiced, but lacks definition in its implementation. The author conducted a search of health science and educational electronic databases using the terms peer, clinical education and undergraduate. The set limitations were publications after 1980 (2005 inclusive), English language and research papers. Selection of studies occurred: based on participant, intervention, research method and learning outcomes, following a rigorous critical and quality appraisal with a purposefully developed tool. The results have been both tabled and collated in a narrative summary. Twelve articles met the inclusion criteria, representing five countries and four health science disciplines. This review reported mostly positive outcomes on the effectiveness of peer teaching and learning; it can increase student's confidence in clinical practice and improve learning in the psychomotor and cognitive domains. Negative aspects were also identified; these include poor student learning if personalities or learning styles are not compatible and students spending less individualized time with the clinical instructor. Peer teaching and learning is an effective educational intervention for health science students on clinical placements. Preclinical education of students congruent with the academic timetable increases student educational outcomes from peer teaching and learning. Strategies are required prior to clinical placement to accommodate incompatible students or poor student learning. The findings from this systematic review, although not statistically significant, do have pragmatic implications for clinical practice. It can increase clinical placement opportunities for undergraduate health students, assist clinical staff with workload pressures and increase clinician time with clients, while further developing students' knowledge, skills and attitudes.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Nominal Group Technique: A Useful Consensus Methodology in Physiotherapy Research.

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Feeding forward: using feedback to promote student reflection and learning – a teaching model

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Occup Ther Int
                Occup Ther Int
                OTI
                Occupational Therapy International
                Hindawi
                0966-7903
                1557-0703
                2019
                28 November 2019
                : 2019
                : 8582470
                Affiliations
                1Faculty of Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo 116-8551, Japan
                2Department of Occupational Therapy, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
                3Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Jack Straws Lane Marston, Oxford OX3 0FL, UK
                4Occupational Therapy, Division of Clinical Health Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middlesex, UK
                5Graduate School of Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo 116-8551, Japan
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: Jodie A. Copley

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6058-7435
                Article
                10.1155/2019/8582470
                6906795
                d916e5ed-c9e4-4fa0-99f3-5d28d97fc7cc
                Copyright © 2019 Reiko Miyamoto et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 22 August 2018
                : 28 February 2019
                : 23 August 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: Discretionary Funds of the Dean of Faculty of Health Sciences
                Categories
                Research Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log