9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      An exploratory study of smokers’ and stakeholders’ expectations of the implementation of a smoke-free policy in a university setting : S. Burns et al .

      , , , ,
      Health Promotion Journal of Australia
      CSIRO Publishing

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Effect of smoke-free workplaces on smoking behaviour: systematic review

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Smoke-free air policies: past, present and future.

            Smoke-free policies have been an important tobacco control intervention. As recently as 20 years ago, few communities required workplaces and hospitality venues to be smoke-free, but today approximately 11% of the world's population live in countries with laws that require these places to be smoke-free. This paper briefly summarises important milestones in the history of indoor smoke-free policies, the role of scientific research in facilitating their adoption, a framework for smoke-free policy evaluation and industry efforts to undermine regulations. At present, smoke-free policies centre on workplaces, restaurants and pubs. In addition, many jurisdictions are now beginning to implement policies in outdoor areas and in shared multiunit housing settings. The future of smoke-free policy development depends on credible scientific data that documents the health risks of secondhand smoke exposure. Over the next 20 years smoke-free policies will very likely extend to outdoor and private areas, and changes in the types of tobacco products that are consumed may also have implications for the nature and scope of the smoke-free policies of the future.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A longitudinal assessment of the impact of smoke-free worksite policies on tobacco use.

              In this cohort study, we assessed the impact of smoke-free work-site policies on smoking cessation behaviors. Smokers were tracked as part of the Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation. Telephone surveys were administered to 1967 employed smokers in 1993 and 2001. Data were gathered on personal and demographic characteristics, tobacco use behaviors, and restrictiveness of worksite smoking policies. People who worked in environments that changed to or maintained smoke-free policies between 1993 and 2001 were 1.9 times more likely (odds ratio [OR] = 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11, 3.32) than people whose worksites did not do so to have stopped smoking by 2001. Continuing smokers decreased their average daily consumption by 2.57 cigarettes. People working in environments that had smoke-free policies in place in both 1993 and 2001 were 2.3 times more likely (OR=2.29; 95% CI=1.08, 4.45) than people not working in such environments to have quit by 2001, and continuing smokers reported a decline in average daily consumption of 3.85 cigarettes. Smoke-free worksite policies help employees reduce their cigarette consumption and stop smoking.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Health Promotion Journal of Australia
                Health Promot J Austr
                CSIRO Publishing
                10361073
                August 2014
                August 2014
                : 25
                : 2
                : 129-135
                Article
                10.1071/HE13044
                d9266044-eb13-44de-a9d4-692116cfac8d
                © 2014

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article