47
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Engaging health care professionals in quality improvement: A qualitative study exploring the synergies between projects of professionalisation and institutionalisation in quality improvement collaborative implementation in Denmark

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To examine the projects of professionalisation and institutionalisation forming health care professions’ engagement in quality improvement collaborative (QIC) implementation in Denmark, and to analyse the synergies and tensions between the two projects given the opportunities afforded by the QICs.

          Methods

          This was a cross-sectional interview study with professionals involved in the implementation of two national QICs in Denmark involving 23 individual interviews and focus group discussions with 75 people representing different professional groups. We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis of the data, drawing on institutional contributions to organisational studies of professions.

          Results

          Study participants engaged widely in QIC implementation. This engagement was formed by a constructive interplay between the professions’ projects of professionalisation and institutionalisation, with only few tensions identified. The project of professionalisation relates to a self-oriented agenda of contributing professional expertise and promoting professional recognition and development, while the project of institutionalisation focuses on improving health care processes and outcomes and advancing quality improvement. Both projects were largely similar across professional groups. The interplay between the two projects was enabled by the bottom-up approach to implementation, participation of QI specialists, and a clear focus on developing and delivering high-quality patient care.

          Conclusions

          Future strategies for QIC implementation should position QICs as a framework that promotes the integration of professions’ projects of professionalisation and institutionalisation to successfully engage professionals in the implementation process, and thereby optimise the effectiveness of QICs in health care.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            How and under what circumstances do quality improvement collaboratives lead to better outcomes? A systematic review

            Background Quality improvement collaboratives are widely used to improve health care in both high-income and low and middle-income settings. Teams from multiple health facilities share learning on a given topic and apply a structured cycle of change testing. Previous systematic reviews reported positive effects on target outcomes, but the role of context and mechanism of change is underexplored. This realist-inspired systematic review aims to analyse contextual factors influencing intended outcomes and to identify how quality improvement collaboratives may result in improved adherence to evidence-based practices. Methods We built an initial conceptual framework to drive our enquiry, focusing on three context domains: health facility setting; project-specific factors; wider organisational and external factors; and two further domains pertaining to mechanisms: intra-organisational and inter-organisational changes. We systematically searched five databases and grey literature for publications relating to quality improvement collaboratives in a healthcare setting and containing data on context or mechanisms. We analysed and reported findings thematically and refined the programme theory. Results We screened 962 abstracts of which 88 met the inclusion criteria, and we retained 32 for analysis. Adequacy and appropriateness of external support, functionality of quality improvement teams, leadership characteristics and alignment with national systems and priorities may influence outcomes of quality improvement collaboratives, but the strength and quality of the evidence is weak. Participation in quality improvement collaborative activities may improve health professionals’ knowledge, problem-solving skills and attitude; teamwork; shared leadership and habits for improvement. Interaction across quality improvement teams may generate normative pressure and opportunities for capacity building and peer recognition. Conclusion Our review offers a novel programme theory to unpack the complexity of quality improvement collaboratives by exploring the relationship between context, mechanisms and outcomes. There remains a need for greater use of behaviour change and organisational psychology theory to improve design, adaptation and evaluation of the collaborative quality improvement approach and to test its effectiveness. Further research is needed to determine whether certain contextual factors related to capacity should be a precondition to the quality improvement collaborative approach and to test the emerging programme theory using rigorous research designs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              How to improve healthcare improvement—an essay by Mary Dixon-Woods

              As improvement practice and research begin to come of age, Mary Dixon-Woods considers the key areas that need attention if we are to reap their benefits
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Health Serv Res Policy
                J Health Serv Res Policy
                sphsr
                HSR
                Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                1355-8196
                1758-1060
                2 February 2024
                July 2024
                : 29
                : 3
                : 163-172
                Affiliations
                [1 ]PhD Student, DEFACTUM, Public Health Research, Central Denmark Region, and Department of Public Health, Ringgold 1006, universityAarhus University; , Aarhus, Denmark
                [2 ]Assistant Professor, Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety and Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Ringgold 428139, universityUniversity of Toronto; , Toronto, ON, Canada
                [3 ]Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Ringgold 1006, universityAarhus University; , Aarhus, Denmark
                [4 ]Senior Researcher and Associate Professor, DEFACTUM, Public Health Research, Central Denmark Region, and Department of Clinical Medicine, Ringgold 1006, universityAarhus University; , Aarhus, Denmark
                [5 ]Research Director and Associate Professor, DEFACTUM, Public Health Research, Central Denmark Region and Department of Public Health, Ringgold 1006, universityAarhus University; , Aarhus, Denmark
                Author notes
                [*]Kathrine Carstensen, DEFACTUM, Public Health Research, Central Denmark Region, and Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Olof Palmes Allé 15, Aarhus N 8200, Denmark. Email: katcar@ 123456rm.dk
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4999-1314
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1589-4070
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0787-0351
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6177-5780
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9199-3463
                Article
                10.1177_13558196241231169
                10.1177/13558196241231169
                11151708
                38308439
                d92e80e2-df5b-46ec-b666-3b69fc1361b5
                © The Author(s) 2024

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: Aarhus University, Graduate School of Health Sciences (DK);
                Funded by: Defactum, Central Denmark Region (DK);
                Funded by: Health Research Fund of Central Denmark Region (DK);
                Award ID: A2075
                Categories
                Original Researchs
                Custom metadata
                ts10

                Social policy & Welfare
                quality improvement collaboratives,healthcare professions,implementation

                Comments

                Comment on this article