2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Detection of Low Back Physiotherapy Exercises With Inertial Sensors and Machine Learning: Algorithm Development and Validation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Physiotherapy is a critical element in the successful conservative management of low back pain (LBP). A gold standard for quantitatively measuring physiotherapy participation is crucial to understanding physiotherapy adherence in managing recovery from LBP.

          Objective

          This study aimed to develop and evaluate a system with wearable inertial sensors to objectively detect the performance of unsupervised exercises for LBP comprising movement in multiple planes and sitting postures.

          Methods

          A quantitative classification design was used within a machine learning framework to detect exercise performance and posture in a cohort of healthy participants. A set of 8 inertial sensors were placed on the participants, and data were acquired as they performed 7 McKenzie low back exercises and 3 sitting posture positions. Engineered time series features were extracted from the data and used to train 9 models by using a 6-fold cross-validation approach, from which the best 2 models were selected for further study. In addition, a convolutional neural network was trained directly on the time series data. A feature importance analysis was performed to identify sensor locations and channels that contributed the most to the models. Finally, a subset of sensor locations and channels was included in a hyperparameter grid search to identify the optimal sensor configuration and best performing algorithms for exercise and posture classification. The final models were evaluated using the F 1 score in a 10-fold cross-validation approach.

          Results

          In total, 19 healthy adults with no history of LBP each completed at least one full session of exercises and postures. Random forest and XGBoost (extreme gradient boosting) models performed the best out of the initial set of 9 engineered feature models. The optimal hardware configuration was identified as a 3-sensor setup—lower back, left thigh, and right ankle sensors with acceleration, gyroscope, and magnetometer channels. The XGBoost model achieved the highest exercise ( F 1 score: mean 0.94, SD 0.03) and posture ( F 1 score: mean 0.90, SD 0.11) classification scores. The convolutional neural network achieved similar results with the same sensor locations, using only the accelerometer and gyroscope channels for exercise classification ( F 1 score: mean 0.94, SD 0.02) and the accelerometer channel alone for posture classification ( F 1 score: mean 0.88, SD 0.07).

          Conclusions

          This study demonstrates the potential of a 3-sensor lower body wearable solution (eg, smart pants) that can identify exercises in multiple planes and proper sitting postures, which is suitable for the treatment of LBP. This technology has the potential to improve the effectiveness of LBP rehabilitation by facilitating quantitative feedback, early problem diagnosis, and possible remote monitoring.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Scikit‐learn: machine learning in python

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Interactive wearable systems for upper body rehabilitation: a systematic review

            Background The development of interactive rehabilitation technologies which rely on wearable-sensing for upper body rehabilitation is attracting increasing research interest. This paper reviews related research with the aim: 1) To inventory and classify interactive wearable systems for movement and posture monitoring during upper body rehabilitation, regarding the sensing technology, system measurements and feedback conditions; 2) To gauge the wearability of the wearable systems; 3) To inventory the availability of clinical evidence supporting the effectiveness of related technologies. Method A systematic literature search was conducted in the following search engines: PubMed, ACM, Scopus and IEEE (January 2010–April 2016). Results Forty-five papers were included and discussed in a new cuboid taxonomy which consists of 3 dimensions: sensing technology, feedback modalities and system measurements. Wearable sensor systems were developed for persons in: 1) Neuro-rehabilitation: stroke (n = 21), spinal cord injury (n = 1), cerebral palsy (n = 2), Alzheimer (n = 1); 2) Musculoskeletal impairment: ligament rehabilitation (n = 1), arthritis (n = 1), frozen shoulder (n = 1), bones trauma (n = 1); 3) Others: chronic pulmonary obstructive disease (n = 1), chronic pain rehabilitation (n = 1) and other general rehabilitation (n = 14). Accelerometers and inertial measurement units (IMU) are the most frequently used technologies (84% of the papers). They are mostly used in multiple sensor configurations to measure upper limb kinematics and/or trunk posture. Sensors are placed mostly on the trunk, upper arm, the forearm, the wrist, and the finger. Typically sensors are attachable rather than embedded in wearable devices and garments; although studies that embed and integrate sensors are increasing in the last 4 years. 16 studies applied knowledge of result (KR) feedback, 14 studies applied knowledge of performance (KP) feedback and 15 studies applied both in various modalities. 16 studies have conducted their evaluation with patients and reported usability tests, while only three of them conducted clinical trials including one randomized clinical trial. Conclusions This review has shown that wearable systems are used mostly for the monitoring and provision of feedback on posture and upper extremity movements in stroke rehabilitation. The results indicated that accelerometers and IMUs are the most frequently used sensors, in most cases attached to the body through ad hoc contraptions for the purpose of improving range of motion and movement performance during upper body rehabilitation. Systems featuring sensors embedded in wearable appliances or garments are only beginning to emerge. Similarly, clinical evaluations are scarce and are further needed to provide evidence on effectiveness and pave the path towards implementation in clinical settings.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Real-world incidence and prevalence of low back pain using routinely collected data

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol
                JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol
                JRAT
                JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                2369-2529
                Jul-Sep 2022
                23 August 2022
                : 9
                : 3
                : e38689
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Holland Bone and Joint Program Sunnybrook Research Institute Toronto, ON Canada
                [2 ] Institute of Biomedical Engineering University of Toronto Toronto, ON Canada
                [3 ] Halterix Corporation Toronto, ON Canada
                [4 ] Division of Orthopaedic Surgery Department of Surgery University of Toronto Toronto, ON Canada
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Cari Whyne cari.whyne@ 123456sunnybrook.ca
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0293-3739
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1938-0210
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1617-596X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3162-4241
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8941-3543
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6822-8314
                Article
                v9i3e38689
                10.2196/38689
                9449825
                35998014
                d934dbfb-a993-485c-8847-32665bb0e375
                ©Abdalrahman Alfakir, Colin Arrowsmith, David Burns, Helen Razmjou, Michael Hardisty, Cari Whyne. Originally published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology (https://rehab.jmir.org), 23.08.2022.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://rehab.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 25 April 2022
                : 30 May 2022
                : 17 June 2022
                : 25 June 2022
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                low back pain,rehabilitation,wearables,inertial measurement units,machine learning,activity recognition

                Comments

                Comment on this article