8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A pan-African spatial assessment of human conflicts with lions and elephants

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          African lions ( Panthera leo) and African savanna ( Loxodonta africana) and forest ( L. cyclotis) elephants pose threats to people, crops, and livestock, and are themselves threatened with extinction. Here, we map these human-wildlife conflicts across Africa. Eighty-two percent of sites containing lions and elephants are adjacent to areas with considerable human pressure. Areas at severe risk of conflict (defined as high densities of humans, crops, and cattle) comprise 9% of the perimeter of these species’ ranges and are found in 18 countries hosting, respectively, ~ 74% and 41% of African lion and elephant populations. Although a variety of alternative conflict-mitigation strategies could be deployed, we focus on assessing the potential of high-quality mitigation fences. Our spatial and economic assessments suggest that investments in the construction and maintenance of strategically located mitigation fences would be a cost-effective strategy to support local communities, protect people from dangerous wildlife, and prevent further declines in lion and elephant populations.

          Abstract

          Growing human population density and farming expansion are fuelling human-wildlife conflict. Here the authors map spatial conflict with lions and elephants across Africa, identify high-risk areas, and estimate the cost-effectiveness of mitigation fences.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Recovery of large carnivores in Europe's modern human-dominated landscapes.

          The conservation of large carnivores is a formidable challenge for biodiversity conservation. Using a data set on the past and current status of brown bears (Ursus arctos), Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx), gray wolves (Canis lupus), and wolverines (Gulo gulo) in European countries, we show that roughly one-third of mainland Europe hosts at least one large carnivore species, with stable or increasing abundance in most cases in 21st-century records. The reasons for this overall conservation success include protective legislation, supportive public opinion, and a variety of practices making coexistence between large carnivores and people possible. The European situation reveals that large carnivores and people can share the same landscape. Copyright © 2014, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Status and ecological effects of the world's largest carnivores.

            Large carnivores face serious threats and are experiencing massive declines in their populations and geographic ranges around the world. We highlight how these threats have affected the conservation status and ecological functioning of the 31 largest mammalian carnivores on Earth. Consistent with theory, empirical studies increasingly show that large carnivores have substantial effects on the structure and function of diverse ecosystems. Significant cascading trophic interactions, mediated by their prey or sympatric mesopredators, arise when some of these carnivores are extirpated from or repatriated to ecosystems. Unexpected effects of trophic cascades on various taxa and processes include changes to bird, mammal, invertebrate, and herpetofauna abundance or richness; subsidies to scavengers; altered disease dynamics; carbon sequestration; modified stream morphology; and crop damage. Promoting tolerance and coexistence with large carnivores is a crucial societal challenge that will ultimately determine the fate of Earth's largest carnivores and all that depends upon them, including humans.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change

              The human impact on life on Earth has increased sharply since the 1970s, driven by the demands of a growing population with rising average per capita income. Nature is currently supplying more materials than ever before, but this has come at the high cost of unprecedented global declines in the extent and integrity of ecosystems, distinctness of local ecological communities, abundance and number of wild species, and the number of local domesticated varieties. Such changes reduce vital benefits that people receive from nature and threaten the quality of life of future generations. Both the benefits of an expanding economy and the costs of reducing nature’s benefits are unequally distributed. The fabric of life on which we all depend—nature and its contributions to people—is unravelling rapidly. Despite the severity of the threats and lack of enough progress in tackling them to date, opportunities exist to change future trajectories through transformative action. Such action must begin immediately, however, and address the root economic, social, and technological causes of nature’s deterioration.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                enrico.di.minin@helsinki.fi
                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2041-1723
                20 May 2021
                20 May 2021
                2021
                : 12
                : 2978
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.7737.4, ISNI 0000 0004 0410 2071, Helsinki Lab of Interdisciplinary Conservation Science, Department of Geosciences and Geography, , University of Helsinki, ; Helsinki, Finland
                [2 ]GRID grid.7737.4, ISNI 0000 0004 0410 2071, Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS), University of Helsinki, ; Helsinki, Finland
                [3 ]GRID grid.16463.36, ISNI 0000 0001 0723 4123, School of Life Sciences, , University of KwaZulu-Natal, ; Durban, South Africa
                [4 ]GRID grid.83440.3b, ISNI 0000000121901201, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, , University College London, ; London, UK
                [5 ]GRID grid.4991.5, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8948, Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, The Recanati‐Kaplan Centre, , University of Oxford, ; Tubney, UK
                [6 ]GRID grid.17635.36, ISNI 0000000419368657, Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, , University of Minnesota, ; St. Paul, MN USA
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5562-318X
                https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9469-1508
                https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5031-5842
                https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3939-8162
                Article
                23283
                10.1038/s41467-021-23283-w
                8138028
                34017002
                d9386cfc-4127-44dc-b0d2-7db900e82232
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 7 April 2020
                : 13 April 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100010663, EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council);
                Award ID: 802933
                Award ID: 802933
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Uncategorized
                biogeography,conservation biology
                Uncategorized
                biogeography, conservation biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article