There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
Recent observations in turkey and chicken hens show that sperm storage in both species
is a highly inefficient process. After artificial insemination (AI), less than 1%
of spermatozoa inseminated are selected for transport to and enter the sperm storage
tubules (SST). It has been shown that the sperm selection process is orchestrated
within the vagina and not at the level of the SST. At least two mechanisms are involved
in the selection of spermatozoa fit for sperm storage, one being mechanical (motility)
and the other biochemical in nature (sperm-vaginal mucosa interactions). Furthermore,
it was also observed that the sperm storage efficiency in the chicken is dependent
upon the logarithm of the number of spermatozoa inseminated. From a practical standpoint,
inseminations performed frequently with a moderate number of spermatozoa should be
more efficient than inseminations performed with higher doses at longer intervals.
Maximal filling of the SST of hens in egg production requires only 1 day for the chicken
and 2 days for the turkey. By contrast, the release of sperm from the SST is about
seven times faster in the chicken than the turkey hen. The efficiency of oviducal
sperm storage is related to a number of factors including age of the hen, stage of
the ovulatory cycle when inseminated, and, in the turkey, if the hen was inseminated
before or after the onset of egg production. Two different categories should be considered
among factors that affect sperm survival in vivo. 1) Factors affecting sperm storage.(ABSTRACT
TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)