14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      [Research on the protective effect of hearing protective device for workers exposed to noise in a motor manufacturing enterprise].

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective: To understand the current situation of noise hazard in a motor manufacturing enterprise, and to explore the protective effect of workers wearing hearing protective device and its possible influencing factors. Methods: In November 2021, a total of 179 noise workers wearing hearing protective devices in a motor manufacturing company in a city were selected as research objects. Personal attenuation rating (PAR) of workers wearing hearing protective devices was measured. Baseline PAR was analyzed for different subgroups of basic demographic information, noise exposure, and the use of hearing protective devices to evaluate the effect of the intervention. Baseline PAR was compared using nonparametric tests. Results: There were 179 workers from 35 positions in 4 types of work, and the over-standard noise rate was 51.2% (42/82), among which the noise exposure intensity of motor equipment debugging workers was the highest [94.4 dB (A) ]. Compared the baseline PAR of different characteristics, it was found that the baseline PAR of male workers, workers whose daily noise exposure time were <8 h, workers who had used the hearing protective devices for 10 to 14 years, and workers who thought the hearing protective devices were comfortable were all higher, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Baseline PAR passing rate was 43.0% (77/179), and PAR of 102 workers who did not pass baseline test increased from 0 (0, 3) dB before intervention to 14 (12, 16) dB after intervention, with statistical significance (P<0.05) . Conclusion: The noise hazard in this motor manufacturing enterprise is serious, and the protective effect of workers wearing hearing protective devices is not good. Gender, daily noise exposure time, years and comfort of wearing hearing protective device are the possible influencing factors of poor protective effect.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi
          Zhonghua lao dong wei sheng zhi ye bing za zhi = Zhonghua laodong weisheng zhiyebing zazhi = Chinese journal of industrial hygiene and occupational diseases
          Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
          1001-9391
          1001-9391
          Nov 20 2023
          : 41
          : 11
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Institute of Occupational Health Assessment, Guangdong Province Hospital for Occuaptional Diseasse Prevention and Treatment, Guangzhou 510300, China School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
          [2 ] Institute of Occupational Health Assessment, Guangdong Province Hospital for Occuaptional Diseasse Prevention and Treatment, Guangzhou 510300, China.
          Article
          10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20220815-00402
          38073207
          d967a2d7-c3c5-4671-91d3-3557e0d8c983
          History

          Personal attenuation rating,Fit testing,Protective effect,Noise,Hearing protective device

          Comments

          Comment on this article