10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Top-100 Most Cited Publications Concerning Network Pharmacology: A Bibliometric Analysis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Network pharmacology (NP) has become an increasingly important focus in the drug research field over the past decade. However, no study to date has mapped the current status of NP. Therefore, we performed a bibliometric study to evaluate the top 100 cited papers on NP.

          Methods

          We searched the Web of Science Core Collection from its inception to February 25, 2019, using the terms “network pharmacology” and “systems pharmacology.” Key data, including title, publication year, number of citations, authors, countries/regions, organizations, and journals, were retrieved and analyzed using Excel 2016 and VOSviewer 1.6.10.

          Results

          The total number of citations for the 100 cited papers ranged from 21 to 1,238, published in 53 journals, from 2005 to 2017. The top three journals with the most publications on NP were Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics ( n = 8, IF2017 = 6.544), Journal of Ethnopharmacology ( n = 8, IF2017 = 3.115), and PLoS One ( n = 7, IF2017 = 2.766). Most published articles were from the USA ( n = 41) and China ( n = 35). The most active author was Wang Yonghua from the Northwest A&F University, and of the 100 publications, 14 listing his name. The most frequently used substantive terms included “drug discovery,” “traditional Chinese medicine (TCM),” “in-vitro,” “cancer,” and “cardiovascular disease.” Conclusions. The USA and China made the greatest contribution to NP research. The current NP research mainly focused on NP methods (including experimental validation) and using them to explore the molecular mechanisms of TCM for some critical diseases such as cardiovascular diseases and cancers. Furthermore, we believe some guidelines should be developed to regulate NP studies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: a scientometric analysis in CiteSpace.

          Regenerative medicine involves research in a number of fields and disciplines such as stem cell research, tissue engineering and biological therapy in general. As research in these areas advances rapidly, it is critical to keep abreast of emerging trends and critical turns of the development of the collective knowledge.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar.

            To compare the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews by authors from China and those from the United States (USA).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Evid Based Complement Alternat Med
                Evid Based Complement Alternat Med
                ECAM
                Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM
                Hindawi
                1741-427X
                1741-4288
                2019
                1 August 2019
                1 August 2019
                : 2019
                : 1704816
                Affiliations
                1Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
                2Evidence-based Social Science Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
                3Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China
                4Editorial Department of Library and Information, Gansu Province Library, Lanzhou, China
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: Cheorl-Ho Kim

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9541-9733
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0408-7567
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7864-3012
                Article
                10.1155/2019/1704816
                6701366
                31467569
                d9a19bbe-4a31-4c29-9a97-34c1aea4b715
                Copyright © 2019 Cuncun Lu et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 25 April 2019
                : 26 June 2019
                : 1 July 2019
                Categories
                Review Article

                Complementary & Alternative medicine
                Complementary & Alternative medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article