7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The artificial silicon retina microchip for the treatment of vision loss from retinitis pigmentosa.

      Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)
      Aged, Blindness, etiology, physiopathology, rehabilitation, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Electroretinography, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Fluorescein Angiography, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Prosthesis Implantation, Retina, surgery, Retinitis Pigmentosa, complications, Safety, Semiconductors, Silicon, Visual Acuity, physiology, Visual Fields, Visual Perception

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To determine the safety and efficacy of the artificial silicon retina (ASR) microchip implanted in the subretinal space to treat vision loss from retinitis pigmentosa. The ASR microchip is a 2-mm-diameter silicon-based device that contains approximately 5000 microelectrode-tipped microphotodiodes and is powered by incident light. The right eyes of 6 patients with retinitis pigmentosa were implanted with the ASR microchip while the left eyes served as controls. Safety and visual function information was collected. During follow-up that ranged from 6 to 18 months, all ASRs functioned electrically. No patient showed signs of implant rejection, infection, inflammation, erosion, neovascularization, retinal detachment, or migration. Visual function improvements occurred in all patients and included unexpected improvements in retinal areas distant from the implant. Subjective improvements included improved perception of brightness, contrast, color, movement, shape, resolution, and visual field size. No significant safety-related adverse effects were observed. The observation of retinal visual improvement in areas far from the implant site suggests a possible generalized neurotrophic-type rescue effect on the damaged retina caused by the presence of the ASR. A larger clinical trial is indicated to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of a subretinally implanted ASR.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article