7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Perceived Discrimination During Prenatal Care at a Community Health Center

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Discrimination in healthcare is associated with fetal growth restriction, preterm birth, and postpartum depression. A community-based participatory research study was designed to measure perceived discrimination and healthcare quality during prenatal care and delivery by a community health center, where the majority of patients served belong to historically marginalized ethnic and racial groups.

          Methods

          A 34-question phone survey was administered to women 18 years and older who received prenatal care at the study site during 2020–2021. The primary outcome was perceived discrimination during obstetric care, measured by the 7-question Discrimination in the Medical Setting (DMS) survey. Secondary outcomes included the association of race with perceived discrimination, quality of care, trust of healthcare providers, and perceived control over medical choices.

          Results

          Ninety-seven women completed the survey, 95 of whom were women of color. The sample was dichotomized into Black ( n = 49) and non-Black ( n = 46). Perceived discrimination for all participants was 21% (20/95), with 31% (15/49) of Black women reporting any discrimination during prenatal care and delivery. Compared to other women of color, Black women reported higher rates of perceived discrimination (31% vs 11%, aOR 3.9 [1.2–12.1], p < 0.05), lower control over health choices (84% vs 98%, aOR 0.1 [0.0–0.8], p < 0.05), and were more likely to perceive lack of respect (12% vs 2%, p = 0.045).

          Conclusion

          Although perceived discrimination at this community health center was low compared to prior studies, Black women experienced higher rates of discrimination than other women of color.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40615-022-01315-5.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The Giving Voice to Mothers study: inequity and mistreatment during pregnancy and childbirth in the United States

          Background Recently WHO researchers described seven dimensions of mistreatment in maternity care that have adverse impacts on quality and safety. Applying the WHO framework for quality care, service users partnered with NGOs, clinicians, and researchers, to design and conduct the Giving Voice to Mothers (GVtM)–US study. Methods Our multi-stakeholder team distributed an online cross-sectional survey to capture lived experiences of maternity care in diverse populations. Patient-designed items included indicators of verbal and physical abuse, autonomy, discrimination, failure to meet professional standards of care, poor rapport with providers, and poor conditions in the health system. We quantified the prevalence of mistreatment by race, socio-demographics, mode of birth, place of birth, and context of care, and describe the intersectional relationships between these variables. Results Of eligible participants (n = 2700), 2138 completed all sections of the survey. One in six women (17.3%) reported experiencing one or more types of mistreatment such as: loss of autonomy; being shouted at, scolded, or threatened; and being ignored, refused, or receiving no response to requests for help. Context of care (e.g. mode of birth; transfer; difference of opinion) correlated with increased reports of mistreatment. Experiences of mistreatment differed significantly by place of birth: 5.1% of women who gave birth at home versus 28.1% of women who gave birth at the hospital. Factors associated with a lower likelihood of mistreatment included having a vaginal birth, a community birth, a midwife, and being white, multiparous, and older than 30 years. Rates of mistreatment for women of colour were consistently higher even when examining interactions between race and other maternal characteristics. For example, 27.2% of women of colour with low SES reported any mistreatment versus 18.7% of white women with low SES. Regardless of maternal race, having a partner who was Black also increased reported mistreatment. Conclusion This is the first study to use indicators developed by service users to describe mistreatment in childbirth in the US. Our findings suggest that mistreatment is experienced more frequently by women of colour, when birth occurs in hospitals, and among those with social, economic or health challenges. Mistreatment is exacerbated by unexpected obstetric interventions, and by patient-provider disagreements. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12978-019-0729-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Racial Discrimination and Adverse Birth Outcomes: An Integrative Review.

            This article presents an integrative review of the literature examining the relationship between racial discrimination and adverse birth outcomes.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The state of research on racial/ethnic discrimination in the receipt of health care.

              We conducted a review to examine current literature on the effects of interpersonal and institutional racism and discrimination occurring within health care settings on the health care received by racial/ethnic minority patients. We searched the PsychNet, PubMed, and Scopus databases for articles on US populations published between January 1, 2008 and November 1, 2011. We used various combinations of the following search terms: discrimination, perceived discrimination, race, ethnicity, racism, institutional racism, stereotype, prejudice or bias, and health or health care. Fifty-eight articles were reviewed. Patient perception of discriminatory treatment and implicit provider biases were the most frequently examined topics in health care settings. Few studies examined the overall prevalence of racial/ethnic discrimination and none examined temporal trends. In general, measures used were insufficient for examining the impact of interpersonal discrimination or institutional racism within health care settings on racial/ethnic disparities in health care. Better instrumentation, innovative methodology, and strategies are needed for identifying and tracking racial/ethnic discrimination in health care settings.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                cwprater@wustl.edu
                Journal
                J Racial Ethn Health Disparities
                J Racial Ethn Health Disparities
                Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                2197-3792
                2196-8837
                29 April 2022
                : 1-6
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.4367.6, ISNI 0000 0001 2355 7002, Department of Medicine, Division of General Medicine, , Washington University School of Medicine, ; St. Louis, MO USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.4367.6, ISNI 0000 0001 2355 7002, Washington University in St. Louis, ; St. Louis, MO USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.262962.b, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9342, St. Louis University, ; St. Louis, MO USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.4367.6, ISNI 0000 0001 2355 7002, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, , Washington University School of Medicine, ; St. Louis, MO USA
                [5 ]GRID grid.262962.b, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9342, St. Louis University College for Public Health and Social Justice, ; St. Louis, MO USA
                [6 ]Affinia Healthcare, St. Louis, MO USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4315-3766
                Article
                1315
                10.1007/s40615-022-01315-5
                9053117
                35486348
                d9c7aa96-802c-4a70-9791-84c17cd124e5
                © W. Montague Cobb-NMA Health Institute 2022

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 7 March 2022
                : 19 April 2022
                : 21 April 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Foundation for Barnes Jewish Hospital
                Award ID: 5184
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Article

                birth outcomes,perceived discrimination,community health center

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log