33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A Decolonial Africa(n)-Centered Psychology of Antiracism

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Coloniality represents the contemporary patterns of power and domination that emerged in the late 15th century during the so-called classic era of colonialism. Although much of psychology and psychological thought has adhered to the logic of coloniality, there is also a considerable body of work that has sought to decolonize psychology. It is within this latter tradition of decolonizing psychology—which seems to have gained increasing attention in recent years—that we situate this article and its attempt to articulate a decolonial Africa(n)-centered psychology that addresses itself to antiracism. While we concede that there are myriad ways by which to practice and theorize such a psychology, we focus specifically on collective antiracist struggle and everyday antiracist resistance. We conclude by considering questions of universalism and epistemology as they relate to a decolonial Africa(n)-centered psychology of antiracism.

          Related collections

          Most cited references96

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Racial Inequality in Psychological Research: Trends of the Past and Recommendations for the Future

              Race plays an important role in how people think, develop, and behave. In the current article, we queried more than 26,000 empirical articles published between 1974 and 2018 in top-tier cognitive, developmental, and social psychology journals to document how often psychological research acknowledges this reality and to examine whether people who edit, write, and participate in the research are systematically connected. We note several findings. First, across the past five decades, psychological publications that highlight race have been rare, and although they have increased in developmental and social psychology, they have remained virtually nonexistent in cognitive psychology. Second, most publications have been edited by White editors, under which there have been significantly fewer publications that highlight race. Third, many of the publications that highlight race have been written by White authors who employed significantly fewer participants of color. In many cases, we document variation as a function of area and decade. We argue that systemic inequality exists within psychological research and that systemic changes are needed to ensure that psychological research benefits from diversity in editing, writing, and participation. To this end, and in the spirit of the field’s recent emphasis on metascience, we offer recommendations for journals and authors.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Review of General Psychology
                Review of General Psychology
                SAGE Publications
                1089-2680
                1939-1552
                December 2021
                June 26 2021
                December 2021
                : 25
                : 4
                : 437-450
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University of South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa
                [2 ]South African Medical Research Council/University of South Africa Masculinity and Health Research Unit, Cape Town, South Africa
                [3 ]University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA
                [4 ]University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
                Article
                10.1177/10892680211022992
                d9ec1e2e-f7ad-459b-b1ff-065c7fb76c0f
                © 2021

                http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log