25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Intraoperative and postoperative feasibility and safety of total tubeless, tubeless, small-bore tube, and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is performed to treat relatively large renal stones. Recent publications indicate that tubeless and total tubeless (stentless) PCNL is safe in selected patients. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the feasibility and safety of different PCNL procedures, including total tubeless, tubeless with stent, small-bore tube, and large-bore tube PCNLs.

          Methods

          PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE™ databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials published before December 30, 2013. One researcher examined all titles and abstracts found by the searches. Two investigators independently evaluated the full-text articles to determine whether those met the inclusion criteria. Qualities of included studies were rated with Cochrane’s risk-of-bias assessment tool.

          Results

          Sixteen studies were included in the final syntheses including pairwise and network meta-analyses. Operation time, pain scores, and transfusion rates were not significantly different between PCNL procedures. Network meta-analyses demonstrated that for hemoglobin changes, total tubeless PCNL may be superior to standard PCNL (mean difference [MD] 0.65, 95% CI 0.14–1.13) and tubeless PCNLs with stent (MD -1.14, 95% CI -1.65–-0.62), and small-bore PCNL may be superior to tubeless PCNL with stent (MD 1.30, 95% CI 0.27–2.26). Network meta-analyses also showed that for length of hospital stay, total tubeless (MD 1.33, 95% CI 0.23–2.43) and tubeless PCNLs with stent (MD 0.99, 95% CI 0.19–1.79) may be superior to standard PCNL. In rank probability tests, small-bore tube and total tubeless PCNLs were superior for operation time, pain scores, and hemoglobin changes.

          Conclusions

          For hemoglobin changes, total tubeless and small-bore PCNLs may be superior to other methods. For hospital stay, total tubeless and tubeless PCNLs with stent may be superior to other procedures.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

            This review focuses on a step-by-step approach to percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) and its complications and management. Based on institutional and personal experience with >1000 patients treated by PNL, we reviewed the literature (Pubmed search) focusing on technique, type, and incidence of complications of the procedure. Complications during or after PNL may be present with an overall complication rate of up to 83%, including extravasation (7.2%), transfusion (11.2-17.5%), and fever (21.0-32.1%), whereas major complications, such as septicaemia (0.3-4.7%) and colonic (0.2-0.8%) or pleural injury (0.0-3.1%) are rare. Comorbidity (i.e., renal insufficiency, diabetes, gross obesity, pulmonary disease) increases the risk of complications. Most complications (i.e., bleeding, extravasation, fever) can be managed conservatively or minimally invasively (i.e., pleural drain, superselective renal embolisation) if recognised early. The most important consideration for achieving consistently successful outcomes in PNL with minimal major complications is the correct selection of patients. A well-standardised technique and postoperative follow-up are mandatory for early detection of complications.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Demystifying trial networks and network meta-analysis.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                joouro@yuhs.ac
                judies99@gmail.com
                mdkim@yuhs.ac
                dhkang0424@inhauh.com
                jkstorm@yuhs.ac
                uroham@yuhs.ac
                youngd74@yuhs.ac
                +82-02-2019-3471 , kscho99@yuhs.ac
                Journal
                BMC Urol
                BMC Urol
                BMC Urology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2490
                27 June 2017
                27 June 2017
                2017
                : 17
                : 48
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0470 5454, GRID grid.15444.30, Department of Urology, , Severance Hospital, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, ; Seoul, South Korea
                [2 ]Department of Urology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, South Korea
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0470 5454, GRID grid.15444.30, Department of Radiology, , Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, ; Seoul, South Korea
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2364 8385, GRID grid.202119.9, Department of Urology, , Inha University School of Medicine, ; Incheon, South Korea
                [5 ]GRID grid.413046.4, Department of Urology, Severance Check-Up, , Yonsei University Health System, ; Seoul, South Korea
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0470 5454, GRID grid.15444.30, Department of Urology, , Gangnam Severance Hospital, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, ; 211 Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06273 South Korea
                Article
                239
                10.1186/s12894-017-0239-x
                5488341
                28655317
                d9fd1f52-d309-4ac4-ba1c-3f0648aacd8d
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 4 October 2015
                : 21 June 2017
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Urology
                calculi,lithotripsy,nephrostomy,percutaneous,meta-analysis,bayes theorem
                Urology
                calculi, lithotripsy, nephrostomy, percutaneous, meta-analysis, bayes theorem

                Comments

                Comment on this article