An Investigation Into the Hypoalgesic Effects of High- and Low-Frequency Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on Experimentally-Induced Blunt Pressure Pain in Healthy Human Participants
There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a noninvasive technique used
to reduce pain. It is claimed that TENS frequency is a key determinant of outcome.
This study compared TENS delivered at 3 pulses per second (pps) and 80 pps on blunt
pressure pain in human participants when TENS intensity was standardized at a strong
nonpainful level. Thirty-two pain-free participants completed an experiment in which
they received TENS at 3 pps and 80 pps in a crossover fashion. An algometer was used
to measure pain threshold for each frequency before and during 20 minutes of TENS.
A statistically significant elevation in pain threshold relative to baseline was found
for 80 pps when compared to 3 pps after 10 and 20 minutes of TENS (P = .001 and P
< .001, respectively). After 20 minutes of TENS, 30 of 32 participants had exceeded
a 10N elevation in threshold relative to baseline during 80 pps compared to 19 participants
during 3 pps (odds ratio 10.3 (CI, 2.28, 44.78), P = .002). We suggest that the higher
rates of impulse generation by TENS at 80 pps resulted in a stronger afferent input
to the central nervous system, resulting in stronger segmental inhibition of nociceptive
transmission of second-order neurones, in line with the gate control theory of pain.
In conclusion, strong nonpainful TENS at 80 pps was superior to 3 pps at increasing
pressure-pain threshold in healthy volunteers. We recommend a follow-up study using
pain patients.