36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A COVID-19 Telehealth Impact Study—Exploring One Year of Telehealth Experimentation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Importance

          This three-part study characterizes the widespread implementation of telehealth during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, giving us insight into the role of telehealth as we enter a stage of “new normal” health care delivery in the United States.

          Objective

          The COVID-19 Telehealth Impact Study was designed to describe the natural experiment of telehealth adoption during the pandemic. Using a large claims data stream and surveys of providers and patients, we studied telehealth in all 50 states to inform health care leaders.

          Design, setting, and participants

          In March 2020, the MITRE Corporation and Mayo Clinic founded the COVID-19 Healthcare Coalition (C19HCC), to respond to the pandemic. We report trends using a dataset of over 2 billion health care claims covering over 50% of private insurance activity in the United States (January 2019–December 2020), along with key elements from our provider survey (July–August 2020) and patient survey (November 2020–February 2021).

          Main outcomes and measures

          There was rapid and widespread adoption of telehealth in the Spring 2020 with over 12 million telehealth claims in April 2020, accounting for 49.4% of total health care claims. Providers and patients expressed high levels of satisfaction with the telehealth. Seventy-five percent of providers indicated that telehealth enabled them to provide a quality care. Eighty-four percent of patients agreed that quality of their telehealth visit was good.

          Results

          Peak levels of telehealth use varied widely among states ranging from 74.9% in Massachusetts to 25.4% in Mississippi. Every clinical discipline saw a steep rise with the largest claims volume in behavioral health. Provision of care by out-of-state provider was common at 6.5% (October–December 2020). Providers reported multiple modalities of telehealth care delivery. Seventy-four percent of patients indicated they will use telehealth services in the future.

          Conclusions and relevance

          Innovation shown by providers and patients during this period of rapid telehealth expansion constitutes a great natural experiment in care delivery with evidence supporting widespread clinical adoption and satisfaction on the part of both patients and providers. The authors encourage continued broad access to telehealth over the next 12 months to allow telehealth best practices to emerge, creating a more effective and resilient system of care delivery.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Patient Characteristics Associated With Telemedicine Access for Primary and Specialty Ambulatory Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic

          Key Points Question What sociodemographic factors are associated with higher use of telemedicine and the use of video (vs telephone) for telemedicine visits for ambulatory care during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic? Findings In this cohort study of 148 402 patients scheduled for primary care and medical specialty ambulatory telemedicine visits at a large academic health system during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, older age, Asian race, non-English language as the patient’s preferred language, and Medicaid were independently associated with fewer completed telemedicine visits. Older age, female sex, Black race, Latinx ethnicity, and lower household income were associated with lower use of video for telemedicine care. Meaning This study identified racial/ethnic, sex, age, language, and socioeconomic differences in accessing telemedicine for primary care and specialty ambulatory care; if not addressed, these differences may compound existing inequities in care among vulnerable populations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Assessing Telemedicine Unreadiness Among Older Adults in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Disparities in use of telehealth at the onset of the COVID-19 public health emergency

              Introduction The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in an unprecedented expansion in telehealth, but little is known about differential use of telehealth according to demographics, rurality, or insurance status. Methods We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 7742 family medicine encounters at a single USA institution in the initial month of the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE). We compared the demographics of those using telehealth during the PHE to those with face-to-face visits during the same time period; we also compared the demographics of those using full audio-video to those using audio-only. Results The likelihood of any telehealth visit in the first 30 days of telehealth expansion was higher for women, those age 65 years and older, self-pay patients, and those with Medicaid and Medicare as primary payers. The likelihood of a telehealth visit was reduced for rural residence and Black or other races. Among all telehealth visits, the likelihood of a full audio-video telehealth visit was reduced for patients who were older, Black, from urban areas, or who were self-pay, Medicaid, or Medicare payer status. Discussion Significant disparities exist in telehealth use during the COVID-19 PHE by age, race, residence and payer.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                TMT
                Telehealth and Medicine Today
                Partners in Digital Health
                2471-6960
                04 August 2021
                2021
                : 6
                : 10.30953/tmt.v6.280
                Affiliations
                [1 ]MITRE Corporation
                [2 ]Atrius Health
                [3 ]Harvard Medical School
                [4 ]Mayo Clinic
                [5 ]Massachusetts Health Quality Partners
                [6 ]Allways Health Partners
                [7 ]Digital Medical Society
                [8 ]Change Healthcare
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Francis X. Campion, MD, FACP, Principal Lead, Digital Health, MITRE Corporation, Bedford, MA 01730-1420, USA, Email: fcampion@ 123456mitre.org
                Article
                280
                10.30953/tmt.v6.280
                da5d2173-5438-4485-b063-ec9ad129dfc0
                © 2021 Francis X. Campion

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, adapt, enhance this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.

                History
                Categories
                Original Clinical Research

                Social & Information networks,General medicine,General life sciences,Health & Social care,Public health,Hardware architecture
                Survey,Digital Health,Claims Data,Telehealth,COVID-19 Pandemic

                Comments

                Comment on this article