5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Rotation, Strain, and Translation Sensors Performance Tests with Active Seismic Sources

      research-article
      1 , * , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 2 , 2 , 3 , 3 , 3 , 3 , 3 , 3 , 3 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 5 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 8 , 8 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 11 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 13 , 13 , 14 , 14 , 15
      Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
      MDPI
      rotation sensors, strain sensors, seismology, instrumentation

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Interest in measuring displacement gradients, such as rotation and strain, is growing in many areas of geophysical research. This results in an urgent demand for reliable and field-deployable instruments measuring these quantities. In order to further establish a high-quality standard for rotation and strain measurements in seismology, we organized a comparative sensor test experiment that took place in November 2019 at the Geophysical Observatory of the Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich in Fürstenfeldbruck, Germany. More than 24 different sensors, including three-component and single-component broadband rotational seismometers, six-component strong-motion sensors and Rotaphone systems, as well as the large ring laser gyroscopes ROMY and a Distributed Acoustic Sensing system, were involved in addition to 14 classical broadband seismometers and a 160 channel, 4.5 Hz geophone chain. The experiment consisted of two parts: during the first part, the sensors were co-located in a huddle test recording self-noise and signals from small, nearby explosions. In a second part, the sensors were distributed into the field in various array configurations recording seismic signals that were generated by small amounts of explosive and a Vibroseis truck. This paper presents details on the experimental setup and a first sensor performance comparison focusing on sensor self-noise, signal-to-noise ratios, and waveform similarities for the rotation rate sensors. Most of the sensors show a high level of coherency and waveform similarity within a narrow frequency range between 10 Hz and 20 Hz for recordings from a nearby explosion signal. Sensor as well as experiment design are critically accessed revealing the great need for reliable reference sensors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references65

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Practical Guide to Wavelet Analysis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Statistics of atomic frequency standards

              D.W. Allan (1966)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sensors (Basel)
                Sensors (Basel)
                sensors
                Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
                MDPI
                1424-8220
                03 January 2021
                January 2021
                : 21
                : 1
                : 264
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department für Geo- und Umweltwissenschaften, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, 80333 München, Germany; Kathrin.Behnen@ 123456web.de (K.B.); j.wassermann@ 123456lmu.de (J.W.); egdorf@ 123456geophysik.uni-muenchen.de (S.E.); igel@ 123456geophysik.uni-muenchen.de (H.I.)
                [2 ]Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources, Stilleweg 2, 30655 Hannover, Germany; stefanie.donner@ 123456bgr.de (S.D.); Klaus.stammler@ 123456bgr.de (K.S.); Mathias.hoffmann@ 123456bgr.de (M.H.)
                [3 ]Department of Earth Sciences, ETH Zürich, Sonneggstrasse 5, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland; pascal.edme@ 123456erdw.ethz.ch (P.E.); david.sollberger@ 123456erdw.ethz.ch (D.S.); cedric.schmelzbach@ 123456erdw.ethz.ch (C.S.); johan.robertsson@ 123456erdw.ethz.ch (J.R.); patrick.paitz@ 123456erdw.ethz.ch (P.P.); jonas.igel@ 123456erdw.ethz.ch (J.I.); krystyna.smolinski@ 123456erdw.ethz.ch (K.S.); andreas.fichtner@ 123456erdw.ethz.ch (A.F.)
                [4 ]Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETH Zürich, Stefano- Franscini-Platz 5, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland; rossiy@ 123456ethz.ch
                [5 ]Institute of Geosciences, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany; gizem.izgi@ 123456uni-potsdam.de (G.I.); Daniel.Vollmer@ 123456geo.uni-potsdam.de (D.V.); eva.eibl@ 123456uni-potsdam.de (E.P.S.E.)
                [6 ]Institute of Geophysics and Geoinformatics, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Gustav-Zeuner-Strasse 12, 09599 Freiberg, Germany; buske@ 123456geophysik.tu-freiberg.de
                [7 ]Bayerisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Hans-Högn-Straße 12, 95030 Hof/Saale, Germany; christian.veress@ 123456lfu.bayern.de
                [8 ]iXblue, 34 Rue de la Croix de Fer, 78100 Saint-Germain-en-Laye, France; frederic.guattari@ 123456ixblue.com (F.G.); theo.laudat@ 123456ixblue.com (T.L.); laurent.mattio@ 123456ixblue.com (L.M.)
                [9 ]Commissariat à L’Énergie Atomique et aux Énergie Alternatives (ou CEA), DAM, DIF, CEDEX, 91297 Arpajon, France; olivier.sebe@ 123456cea.fr (O.S.); serge.olivier@ 123456cea.fr (S.O.); charly.lallemand@ 123456cea.fr (C.L.)
                [10 ]Streckeisen GmbH, Daettlikonerstrasse 5, 8422 Pfungen, Switzerland; basil.brunner@ 123456streckeisen.biz
                [11 ]Institute of Applied Physics, Military University of Technology, 2 gen. S. Kaliskiego Str., 00-908 Warsaw, Poland; anna.kurzych@ 123456wat.edu.pl (A.T.K.); michal.dudek@ 123456wat.edu.pl (M.D.); leszek.jaroszewicz@ 123456wat.edu.pl (L.R.J.)
                [12 ]Elproma Elektronika Ltd., 13 Szymanowskiego Str., 05-082 Łomianki, Poland; j.kowalski@ 123456elpromaelectronics.com
                [13 ]Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Opole University of Technology, ul.Katowicka 48, 45-061 Opole, Poland; p.bonkowski@ 123456po.opole.pl (P.A.B.); p.bobra@ 123456po.opole.pl (P.B.); z.zembaty@ 123456po.edu.pl (Z.Z.)
                [14 ]Institute of Rock Structure and Mechanics, Czech Academy of Sciences, V Holešovičkách 41, 182 09 Prague, Czech Repulic; vackar@ 123456irsm.cas.cz (J.V.); malek@ 123456irsm.cas.cz (J.M.)
                [15 ]Department of Geophysics, Charles University, V Holešovičkách 2, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic; johana.brokesova@ 123456mff.cuni.cz
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9509-4905
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4088-1792
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3109-7055
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7242-6399
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7351-8079
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3041-0559
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6408-6681
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1380-8714
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3292-385X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7464-224X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1960-511X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3090-963X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0067-0069
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4123-7533
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0667-0035
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3111-6922
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8009-7022
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7547-0638
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7766-0969
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8838-5846
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9931-9115
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7306-2558
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1605-5167
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4696-2454
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6097-9634
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8363-0950
                Article
                sensors-21-00264
                10.3390/s21010264
                7795288
                33401539
                da74082b-8ed8-4500-a67a-046193057040
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 11 December 2020
                : 30 December 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Biomedical engineering
                rotation sensors,strain sensors,seismology,instrumentation
                Biomedical engineering
                rotation sensors, strain sensors, seismology, instrumentation

                Comments

                Comment on this article