42
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Feasibility study of computed tomography colonography using limited bowel preparation at normal and low-dose levels study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The purpose was to evaluate low-dose CT colonography without cathartic cleansing in terms of image quality, polyp visualization and patient acceptance. Sixty-one patients scheduled for colonoscopy started a low-fiber diet, lactulose and amidotrizoic-acid for fecal tagging 2 days prior to the CT scan (standard dose, 5.8–8.2 mSv). The original raw data of 51 patients were modified and reconstructed at simulated 2.3 and 0.7 mSv levels. Two observers evaluated the standard dose scan regarding image quality and polyps. A third evaluated the presence of polyps at all three mSv levels in a blinded prospective way. All observers were blinded to the reference standard: colonoscopy. At three times patients were given questionnaires relating to their experiences and preference. Image quality was sufficient in all patients, but significantly lower in the cecum, sigmoid and rectum. The two observers correctly identified respectively 10/15 (67%) and 9/15 (60%) polyps ≥10 mm, with 5 and 8 false-positive lesions (standard dose scan). Dose reduction down to 0.7 mSv was not associated with significant changes in diagnostic value (polyps ≥10 mm). Eighty percent of patients preferred CT colonography and 13% preferred colonoscopy (P<0.001). CT colonography without cleansing is preferred to colonoscopy and shows sufficient image quality and moderate sensitivity, without impaired diagnostic value at dose-levels as low as 0.7 mSv.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence.

          S Winawer (2003)
          We have updated guidelines for screening for colorectal cancer. The original guidelines were prepared by a panel convened by the U.S. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research and published in 1997 under the sponsorship of a consortium of gastroenterology societies. Since then, much has changed, both in the research rature and in the clinical context. The present report summarizes new developments in this field and suggests how they should change practice. As with the previous version, these guidelines offer screening options and encourage the physician and patient to decide together which is the best approach for them. The guidelines also take into account not only the effectiveness of screening but also the risks, inconvenience, and cost of the various approaches. These guidelines differ from those published in 1997 in several ways: we recommend against rehydrating fecal occult blood tests; the screening interval for double contrast barium enema has been shortened to 5 years; colonoscopy is the preferred test for the diagnostic investigation of patients with findings on screening and for screening patients with a family history of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer; recommendations for people with a family history of colorectal cancer make greater use of risk stratification; and guidelines for genetic testing are included. Guidelines for surveillance are also included. Follow-up of postpolypectomy patients relies now on colonoscopy, and the first follow-up examination has been lengthened from 3 to 5 years for low-risk patients. If this were adopted nationally, surveillance resources could be shifted to screening and diagnosis. Promising new screening tests (virtual colonoscopy and tests for altered DNA in stool) are in development but are not yet ready for use outside of research studies. Despite a consensus among expert groups on the effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer, screening rates remain low. Improvement depends on changes in patients' attitudes, physicians' behaviors, insurance coverage, and the surveillance and reminder systems necessary to support screening programs.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia.

            Conventional colonoscopy is the best available method for detection of colorectal cancer; however, it is invasive and not without risk. Computed tomographic colonography (CTC), also known as virtual colonoscopy, has been reported to be reasonably accurate in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia in studies performed at expert centers. To assess the accuracy of CTC in a large number of participants across multiple centers. A nonrandomized, evaluator-blinded, noninferiority study design of 615 participants aged 50 years or older who were referred for routine, clinically indicated colonoscopy in 9 major hospital centers between April 17, 2000, and October 3, 2001. The CTC was performed by using multislice scanners immediately before standard colonoscopy; findings at colonoscopy were reported before and after segmental unblinding to the CTC results. The sensitivity and specificity of CTC and conventional colonoscopy in detecting participants with lesions sized at least 6 mm. Secondary outcomes included detection of all lesions, detection of advanced lesions, possible technical confounders, participant preferences, and evidence for increasing accuracy with experience. A total of 827 lesions were detected in 308 of 600 participants who underwent both procedures; 104 participants had lesions sized at least 6 mm. The sensitivity of CTC for detecting participants with 1 or more lesions sized at least 6 mm was 39.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29.6%-48.4%) and for lesions sized at least 10 mm, it was 55.0% (95% CI, 39.9%-70.0%). These results were significantly lower than those for conventional colonoscopy, with sensitivities of 99.0% (95% CI, 97.1%->99.9%) and 100%, respectively. A total of 496 participants were without any lesion sized at least 6 mm. The specificity of CTC and conventional colonoscopy for detecting participants without any lesion sized at least 6 mm was 90.5% (95% CI, 87.9%-93.1%) and 100%, respectively, and without lesions sized at least 10 mm, 96.0% (95% CI, 94.3%-97.6%) and 100%, respectively. Computed tomographic colonography missed 2 of 8 cancers. The accuracy of CTC varied considerably between centers and did not improve as the study progressed. Participants expressed no clear preference for either technique. Computed tomographic colonography by these methods is not yet ready for widespread clinical application. Techniques and training need to be improved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK.

              Flat and depressed colorectal tumours were originally thought to be unique to the Japanese population. Recently there have been reports of flat and depressed lesions in western countries but they have been thought to be uncommon. In this prospective study, 1000 consecutive patients attending for routine colonoscopy were examined for flat or depressed lesions. The examinations were done by one European colonoscopist using methods developed in Japan. 321 adenomas were found: 202 (63%) were polypoid, 36% (117) were flat and 2 (0.6%) appeared depressed. Most adenomas contained areas of mild or moderate dysplasia but 10% (31) were severely dysplastic. Six Dukes' A adenocarcinomas were identified together with 25 more advanced adenocarcinomas. The likelihood of Dukes' A cancer or severe dysplasia increased from 4% (3/70) in small flat lesions, to 6% (9/154) in small polyps, 16% (8/50) in larger polyps, 29% (14/49) in large flat lesions, and 75% (3/4) in depressed lesions. 54% (20/37) lesions containing severe dysplasia or Dukes' A carcinoma were flat or depressed. The polyp-carcinoma hypothesis prompts colonoscopists to search only for polypoid lesions when screening for cancer, and many early colorectal neoplasms may therefore be missed. Colonoscopists require training in the recognition of flat and depressed lesions to detect colorectal tumours in the early stages.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31-20-5662432 , +31-20-5669119 , J.Florie@amc.uva.nl
                Journal
                Eur Radiol
                European Radiology
                Springer-Verlag (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0938-7994
                1432-1084
                5 June 2007
                December 2007
                : 17
                : 12
                : 3112-3122
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, G1-230, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [2 ]Department of MedicaPhysics, Academic Medical Center, L0-106, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Department of Radiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, P.O. BOX 95500, 1090 HM Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [4 ]Department Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Academic Medical Center, J1b-212, P.O. BOX 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [5 ]Department Gastroenterology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, P.O. BOX 95500, 1090 HM Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [6 ]Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, G1-211, P.O. BOX 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Article
                668
                10.1007/s00330-007-0668-0
                2077917
                17549490
                dae5511d-bbb3-4f9d-81d8-9f9888abfe4a
                © Springer-Verlag 2007
                History
                : 27 July 2006
                : 17 March 2007
                : 17 April 2007
                Categories
                Gastrointestinal
                Custom metadata
                © European Society of Radiology 2007

                Radiology & Imaging
                fecal tagging,colonoscopy,ct colonography,colonic neoplasm
                Radiology & Imaging
                fecal tagging, colonoscopy, ct colonography, colonic neoplasm

                Comments

                Comment on this article