5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Indirect treatment comparisons of the gene therapy etranacogene dezaparvovec versus extended half‐life factor IX therapies for severe or moderately severe haemophilia B

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Etranacogene dezaparvovec gene therapy for haemophilia B demonstrated superior efficacy at 24 months in reducing bleeds versus a ≥6‐month lead‐in period of prophylaxis with FIX products in the phase 3 trial, HOPE‐B. In the absence of head‐to‐head comparisons of etranacogene dezaparvovec versus FIX products, indirect treatment comparisons (ITC) can be used.

          Aim

          To compare the efficacy of etranacogene dezaparvovec versus rIX‐FP, rFIXFc and N9‐GP using ITC, and support HOPE‐B results.

          Methods

          Data were leveraged from Phase 3 pivotal trials: HOPE‐B, PROLONG‐9FP, B‐LONG and Paradigm 2. Annualised bleeding rates (ABR), spontaneous (AsBR) and joint (AjBR) bleeding rates, percentage of patients with no bleeds, and FIX consumption were assessed using inverse probability of treatment weighting and matching adjusted indirect comparisons.

          Results

          Etranacogene dezaparvovec demonstrated statistically significantly lower bleeding rates versus all comparators. Rate ratios for ABR, AsBR and AjBR versus rIX‐FP were 0.19 ( p < .0001), 0.08 ( p < .0001) and 0.09 ( p < .0001), respectively. Rate ratios for ABR, AsBR and AjBR versus rFIXFc were 0.14 ( p < .0001), 0.13 ( p = .0083) and 0.15 ( p = .0111), respectively. Rate ratios for ABR and AsBR, versus N9‐GP were 0.24 ( p = .0231) and 0.13 ( p = .0071), respectively. Etranacogene dezaparvovec demonstrated significantly higher percentage of patients with no bleeds versus rIX‐FP and rFIXFc; odds ratios: 17.60 ( p < .0001) and 5.65 ( p = .0037), respectively. Etranacogene dezaparvovec resulted in significantly lower FIX consumption than all comparators.

          Conclusions

          ITC suggests that etranacogene dezaparvovec offers patients with haemophilia B (≤2% of normal FIX expression) a single dose treatment that can significantly reduce bleeding rates and eliminate routine infusions associated with FIX therapies.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Journal
          Haemophilia
          Haemophilia
          Wiley
          1351-8216
          1365-2516
          October 30 2023
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department for Internal Medicine Haemophilia Treatment Centre Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain Berlin Germany
          [2 ] Institute of Experimental Hematology and Transfusion Medicine University Hospital Bonn, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn Bonn Nordrhein‐Westfalen Germany
          [3 ] EVERSANA Ontario Canada
          [4 ] Haemophilia Centre and Thrombosis Unit Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust London UK
          [5 ] CSL Behring King of Prussia Pennsylvania USA
          Article
          10.1111/hae.14882
          37902714
          daecb091-2a77-464b-a6ee-d16e2083a899
          © 2023

          http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article