27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    8
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Is Evidence-Based Practice a Threat to the Progress of the Qualitative Community? Arguments From the Bottom of the Pyramid

      ,
      Qualitative Inquiry
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research.

          The objective of this study is to outline explicit criteria for assessing the contribution of qualitative empirical studies in health and medicine, leading to a hierarchy of evidence specific to qualitative methods. This paper arose from a series of critical appraisal exercises based on recent qualitative research studies in the health literature. We focused on the central methodological procedures of qualitative method (defining a research framework, sampling and data collection, data analysis, and drawing research conclusions) to devise a hierarchy of qualitative research designs, reflecting the reliability of study conclusions for decisions made in health practice and policy. We describe four levels of a qualitative hierarchy of evidence-for-practice. The least likely studies to produce good evidence-for-practice are single case studies, followed by descriptive studies that may provide helpful lists of quotations but do not offer detailed analysis. More weight is given to conceptual studies that analyze all data according to conceptual themes but may be limited by a lack of diversity in the sample. Generalizable studies using conceptual frameworks to derive an appropriately diversified sample with analysis accounting for all data are considered to provide the best evidence-for-practice. Explicit criteria and illustrative examples are described for each level. A hierarchy of evidence-for-practice specific to qualitative methods provides a useful guide for the critical appraisal of papers using these methods and for defining the strength of evidence as a basis for decision making and policy generation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Street-Level Bureaucrats and Institutional Innovation: Implementing Special-Education Reform

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Anthropology in health research: from qualitative methods to multidisciplinarity.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Qualitative Inquiry
                Qualitative Inquiry
                SAGE Publications
                1077-8004
                1552-7565
                October 21 2014
                February 24 2015
                : 21
                : 7
                : 628-632
                Article
                10.1177/1077800414563808
                dafdecb8-38de-479e-9856-a173e18c39e7
                © 2014
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article