10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Self-esteem and culture: Differences in cognitive self-evaluations or affective self-regard?

      , , ,
      Asian Journal Of Social Psychology
      Wiley-Blackwell

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Visualization of an Oxygen-deficient Bottom Water Circulation in Osaka Bay, Japan

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change.

            A central theme in recent research on attitudes is the distinction between deliberate, "explicit" attitudes and automatic, "implicit" attitudes. The present article provides an integrative review of the available evidence on implicit and explicit attitude change that is guided by a distinction between associative and propositional processes. Whereas associative processes are characterized by mere activation independent of subjective truth or falsity, propositional reasoning is concerned with the validation of evaluations and beliefs. The proposed associative-propositional evaluation (APE) model makes specific assumptions about the mutual interplay of the 2 processes, implying several mechanisms that lead to symmetric or asymmetric changes in implicit and explicit attitudes. The model integrates a broad range of empirical evidence and implies several new predictions for implicit and explicit attitude change.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Norms for experiencing emotions in different cultures: inter- and intranational differences.

              Within- and between-nations differences in norms for experiencing emotions were analyzed in a cross-cultural study with 1,846 respondents from 2 individualistic (United States, Australia) and 2 collectivistic (China, Taiwan) countries. A multigroup latent class analysis revealed that there were both universal and culture-specific types of norms for experiencing emotions. Moreover, strong intranational variability in norms for affect could be detected, particularly for collectivistic nations. Unexpectedly, individualistic nations were most uniform in norms, particularly with regard to pleasant affect. Individualistic and collectivistic nations differed most strongly in norms for self-reflective emotions (e.g., pride and guilt). Norms for emotions were related to emotional experiences within nations. Furthermore, there were strong national differences in reported emotional experiences, even when norms were held constant.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Asian Journal Of Social Psychology
                Asian J Soc Psychol
                Wiley-Blackwell
                1367-2223
                1467-839X
                September 2007
                September 2007
                : 10
                : 3
                : 162-170
                Article
                10.1111/j.1467-839X.2007.00222.x
                db0828f0-440b-42aa-9242-63d529a0b3ad
                © 2007

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article