9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Symptom reporting, healthcare-seeking behaviour and antibiotic use for common infections: protocol for Bug Watch, a prospective community cohort study

      protocol

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Antimicrobial resistance is a significant worldwide problem largely driven by selective pressure exerted through antibiotic use. Preserving antibiotics requires identification of opportunities to safely reduce prescriptions, for example in the management of mild common infections in the community. However, more information is needed on how infections are usually managed and what proportion lead to consultation and antibiotic use. The aim of this study is to quantify consultation and prescribing patterns in the community for a range of common acute infection syndromes (respiratory, gastrointestinal, skin/soft tissue, mouth/dental, eye and urinary tract). This will inform development of interventions to improve antibiotic stewardship as part of a larger programme of work, Preserving Antibiotics through Safe Stewardship.

          Methods and analysis

          This will be an online prospective community cohort study in England. We will invite 19 510 adults who previously took part in a nationally representative survey (the Health Survey for England) and consented to be contacted about future studies. Adults will also be asked to register their children. Data collection will consist of a baseline registration survey followed by weekly surveys sent by email for 6 months. Weekly surveys will collect information on symptoms of common infections, healthcare-seeking behaviour and use of treatments including antibiotics. We will calculate the proportions of infection syndromes that lead to General Practitioner consultation and antibiotic prescription. We will investigate how healthcare-seeking and treatment behaviours vary by demographics, social deprivation, infection profiles and knowledge and attitudes towards antibiotics, and will apply behavioural theory to investigate barriers and enablers to these behaviours.

          Ethics and dissemination

          This study has been given ethical approval by the University College London Research Ethics Committee (ID 11813/001). Each participant will provide informed consent upon registration. We will disseminate our work through publication in peer-reviewed academic journals. Anonymised data will be made available through the UK Data Service ( https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/).

          Related collections

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Actual versus 'ideal' antibiotic prescribing for common conditions in English primary care.

          Previous work based on guidelines and expert opinion identified 'ideal' prescribing proportions-the overall proportion of consultations that should result in an antibiotic prescription-for common infectious conditions. Here, actual condition-specific prescribing proportions in primary care in England were compared with ideal prescribing proportions identified by experts.
            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Journal
            BMJ Open
            BMJ Open
            bmjopen
            bmjopen
            BMJ Open
            BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
            2044-6055
            2019
            22 May 2019
            : 9
            : 5
            : e028676
            Affiliations
            [1 ] departmentInstitute of Health Informatics , University College London , London, UK
            [2 ] NatCen Social Research , London, UK
            [3 ] departmentCentre for Behaviour Change , University College London , London, UK
            [4 ] departmentDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health , University College London , London, UK
            [5 ] departmentPopulation Health Science Institute , University of Bristol , Bristol, UK
            [6 ] departmentInstitute of Epidemiology and Health Care , University College London , London, UK
            [7 ] departmentFaculty of Epidemiology & Population Health , London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , London, UK
            Author notes
            [Correspondence to ] Dr Catherine M Smith; catherine.m.smith@ 123456ucl.ac.uk
            Author information
            http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3959-8479
            http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7954-8823
            Article
            bmjopen-2018-028676
            10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028676
            6537990
            31123004
            db5f9022-5c2a-430e-ac08-795f43f6868b
            © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

            This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            : 19 December 2018
            : 19 March 2019
            : 09 April 2019
            Funding
            Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000269, Economic and Social Research Council;
            Categories
            Epidemiology
            Protocol
            1506
            1692
            Custom metadata
            unlocked

            Medicine
            epidemiology,infectious diseases,public health,primary care
            Medicine
            epidemiology, infectious diseases, public health, primary care

            Comments

            Comment on this article

            scite_

            Similar content69

            Cited by5

            Most referenced authors326