3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Next-generation sequencing for BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutation testing in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: a position paper

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BCR-ABL1 kinase domain (KD) mutation status is considered to be an important element of clinical decision algorithms for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients who do not achieve an optimal response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Conventional Sanger sequencing is the method currently recommended to test BCR-ABL1 KD mutations. However, Sanger sequencing has limited sensitivity and cannot always discriminate between polyclonal and compound mutations. The use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) is increasingly widespread in diagnostic laboratories and represents an attractive alternative. Currently available data on the clinical impact of NGS-based mutational testing in CML patients do not allow recommendations with a high grade of evidence to be prepared. This article reports the results of a group discussion among an ad hoc expert panel with the objective of producing recommendations on the appropriateness of clinical decisions about the indication for NGS, the performance characteristics of NGS platforms, and the therapeutic changes that could be applied based on the use of NGS in CML. Overall, these recommendations might be employed to inform clinicians about the practical use of NGS in CML.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: 2013.

          Advances in chronic myeloid leukemia treatment, particularly regarding tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mandate regular updating of concepts and management. A European LeukemiaNet expert panel reviewed prior and new studies to update recommendations made in 2009. We recommend as initial treatment imatinib, nilotinib, or dasatinib. Response is assessed with standardized real quantitative polymerase chain reaction and/or cytogenetics at 3, 6, and 12 months. BCR-ABL1 transcript levels ≤10% at 3 months, 10% at 6 months and >1% from 12 months onward define failure, mandating a change in treatment. Similarly, partial cytogenetic response (PCyR) at 3 months and complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) from 6 months onward define optimal response, whereas no CyR (Philadelphia chromosome-positive [Ph+] >95%) at 3 months, less than PCyR at 6 months, and less than CCyR from 12 months onward define failure. Between optimal and failure, there is an intermediate warning zone requiring more frequent monitoring. Similar definitions are provided for response to second-line therapy. Specific recommendations are made for patients in the accelerated and blastic phases, and for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Optimal responders should continue therapy indefinitely, with careful surveillance, or they can be enrolled in controlled studies of treatment discontinuation once a deeper molecular response is achieved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Final 5-Year Study Results of DASISION: The Dasatinib Versus Imatinib Study in Treatment-Naïve Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Trial.

            We report the 5-year analysis from the phase III Dasatinib Versus Imatinib Study in Treatment-Naïve Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients (DASISION) trial, evaluating long-term efficacy and safety outcomes of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP) treated with dasatinib or imatinib.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Long-term benefits and risks of frontline nilotinib vs imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: 5-year update of the randomized ENESTnd trial

              In the phase 3 Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials–Newly Diagnosed Patients (ENESTnd) study, nilotinib resulted in earlier and higher response rates and a lower risk of progression to accelerated phase/blast crisis (AP/BC) than imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). Here, patients' long-term outcomes in ENESTnd are evaluated after a minimum follow-up of 5 years. By 5 years, more than half of all patients in each nilotinib arm (300 mg twice daily, 54% 400 mg twice daily, 52%) achieved a molecular response 4.5 (MR4.5; BCR-ABL⩽0.0032% on the International Scale) compared with 31% of patients in the imatinib arm. A benefit of nilotinib was observed across all Sokal risk groups. Overall, safety results remained consistent with those from previous reports. Numerically more cardiovascular events (CVEs) occurred in patients receiving nilotinib vs imatinib, and elevations in blood cholesterol and glucose levels were also more frequent with nilotinib. In contrast to the high mortality rate associated with CML progression, few deaths in any arm were associated with CVEs, infections or pulmonary diseases. These long-term results support the positive benefit-risk profile of frontline nilotinib 300 mg twice daily in patients with CML-CP.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                simona.soverini@unibo.it
                Journal
                J Hematol Oncol
                J Hematol Oncol
                Journal of Hematology & Oncology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1756-8722
                5 December 2019
                5 December 2019
                2019
                : 12
                : 131
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1757 1758, GRID grid.6292.f, Hematology/Oncology “L. e A. Seràgnoli”, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), , University of Bologna, ; S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy
                [2 ]Hematology, S. Eugenio Hospital, ASLRoma2, Rome, Italy
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1757 4641, GRID grid.9024.f, Hematology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, , University of Siena, ; Siena, Italy
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1763 1124, GRID grid.5611.3, Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology, , University of Verona, ; Verona, Italy
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1757 3729, GRID grid.5395.a, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Hematology, , University of Pisa, ; Pisa, Italy
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1759 9494, GRID grid.24704.35, Department of Cellular Therapies and Transfusion Medicine, , AOU Careggi, ; Florence, Italy
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1757 2822, GRID grid.4708.b, Hematology Division, Foundation IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, , University of Milan, ; Milan, Italy
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0790 385X, GRID grid.4691.a, Hematology Unit, , AUOP Federico II, ; Naples, Italy
                [9 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1789 4477, GRID grid.432329.d, Hematology Unit, , Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza, ; Turin, Italy
                [10 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0484 5983, GRID grid.414700.6, Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences of the University of Turin, , Mauriziano Hospital, ; Turin, Italy
                [11 ]Hematology Section and BMT Unit, Rodolico Hospital, AOU Policlinico-V. Emanuele, Catania, Italy
                [12 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2113 062X, GRID grid.5390.f, Division of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Department of Medical Area, , University of Udine, ; Udine, Italy
                [13 ]Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Center of Experimental Oncology and Hematology, A.O.U. Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, Italy
                [14 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1760 3027, GRID grid.419425.f, Center for the Study of Myelofibrosis, , IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo Foundation, ; Pavia, Italy
                [15 ]GRID grid.7841.a, Hematology, Department of Cellular Biotechnologies and Hematology, , Sapienza University, ; Rome, Italy
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4508-0353
                Article
                815
                10.1186/s13045-019-0815-5
                6894351
                31801582
                db7e5944-41b5-439c-a508-4971d5fa8829
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 13 August 2019
                : 27 October 2019
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                next-generation sequencing,chronic myeloid leukemia,sanger sequencing,bcr-abl1 mutation

                Comments

                Comment on this article