4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Engaging Youth in the Bipolar Youth Action Project: Community-Based Participatory Research

      research-article
      , BA 1 , , MA 1 , , MD, BHK, FRCPC 1 , , PhD 2 , , BA 3 , Bipolar Youth Action Group 1 , , PhD 1 ,
      (Reviewer), (Reviewer)
      Journal of Participatory Medicine
      JMIR Publications
      community-based participatory research, bipolar disorder, adolescent, young adult, youth, participatory research

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          We describe the methodological dimensions of community-based participatory research through a description of study design, youth engagement, and methods/processes in the cocreation of knowledge within a Canadian study, the Bipolar Youth Action Project. This collaborative partnership—carried out by a team composed of academic, community, and youth partners—was designed to investigate self-management and wellness strategies for young adults living with bipolar disorder.

          Objective

          The aim is to describe the opportunities and challenges of this collaboration and to reflect upon the process of involving youth with bipolar disorder in health research that concerns them, and share lessons learned.

          Methods

          The project was conducted in multiple phases over 2 years: (1) grant-writing, with youth contributing to the process; (2) recruitment, in which 12 youth were selected and trained to help shape and conduct two research forums; (3) the first research forum, where more youth were consulted about the strategies they apply to stay well (self-management strategies); (4) data analysis of Forum I findings; (5) research Forum II, which consulted youth with bipolar disorder about knowledge translation of Forum I findings; and (6) data analysis of Forum II findings. Youth peer researchers with bipolar disorder were involved in a significant capacity at every stage in the process.

          Results

          Of the initial 12 youth peer researchers, 7 remained on the project from the recruitment phase until the project ended. They collaborated in the creation of two youth research forums that consulted youth with bipolar disorder on their self-management strategies.

          Conclusions

          This article shares what was learned from the process of partnering with youth with bipolar disorder in a community-based participatory research study.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global burden of disease in young people aged 10-24 years: a systematic analysis.

          Young people aged 10-24 years represent 27% of the world's population. Although important health problems and risk factors for disease in later life emerge in these years, the contribution to the global burden of disease is unknown. We describe the global burden of disease arising in young people and the contribution of risk factors to that burden. We used data from WHO's 2004 Global Burden of Disease study. Cause-specific disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for young people aged 10-24 years were estimated by WHO region on the basis of available data for incidence, prevalence, severity, and mortality. WHO member states were classified into low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries, and into WHO regions. We estimated DALYs attributable to specific global health risk factors using the comparative risk assessment method. DALYs were divided into years of life lost because of premature mortality (YLLs) and years lost because of disability (YLDs), and are presented for regions by sex and by 5-year age groups. The total number of incident DALYs in those aged 10-24 years was about 236 million, representing 15·5% of total DALYs for all age groups. Africa had the highest rate of DALYs for this age group, which was 2·5 times greater than in high-income countries (208 vs 82 DALYs per 1000 population). Across regions, DALY rates were 12% higher in girls than in boys between 15 and 19 years (137 vs 153). Worldwide, the three main causes of YLDs for 10-24-year-olds were neuropsychiatric disorders (45%), unintentional injuries (12%), and infectious and parasitic diseases (10%). The main risk factors for incident DALYs in 10-24-year-olds were alcohol (7% of DALYs), unsafe sex (4%), iron deficiency (3%), lack of contraception (2%), and illicit drug use (2%). The health of young people has been largely neglected in global public health because this age group is perceived as healthy. However, opportunities for prevention of disease and injury in this age group are not fully exploited. The findings from this study suggest that adolescent health would benefit from increased public health attention. None. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health.

            Community-based research in public health focuses on social, structural, and physical environmental inequities through active involvement of community members, organizational representatives, and researchers in all aspects of the research process. Partners contribute their expertise to enhance understanding of a given phenomenon and to integrate the knowledge gained with action to benefit the community involved. This review provides a synthesis of key principles of community-based research, examines its place within the context of different scientific paradigms, discusses rationales for its use, and explores major challenges and facilitating factors and their implications for conducting effective community-based research aimed at improving the public's health.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Community-based research partnerships: challenges and opportunities.

              The complexity of many urban health problems often makes them ill suited to traditional research approaches and interventions. The resultant frustration, together with community calls for genuine partnership in the research process, has highlighted the importance of an alternative paradigm. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is presented as a promising collaborative approach that combines systematic inquiry, participation, and action to address urban health problems. Following a brief review of its basic tenets and historical roots, key ways in which CBPR adds value to urban health research are introduced and illustrated. Case study examples from diverse international settings are used to illustrate some of the difficult ethical challenges that may arise in the course of CBPR partnership approaches. The concepts of partnership synergy and cultural humility, together with protocols such as Green et al.'s guidelines for appraising CBPR projects, are highlighted as useful tools for urban health researchers seeking to apply this collaborative approach and to deal effectively with the difficult ethical challenges it can present.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Particip Med
                J Particip Med
                JoPM
                Journal of Participatory Medicine
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                2152-7202
                Jul-Sep 2020
                10 September 2020
                : 12
                : 3
                : e19475
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Psychiatry University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC Canada
                [2 ] Faculty of Information and Media Studies Western University London, ON Canada
                [3 ] Stigma-Free Society Vancouver, BC Canada
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Erin E Michalak erin.michalak@ 123456ubc.ca
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0810-3664
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4909-3028
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3755-160X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3979-7603
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8079-9718
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0812-6527
                Article
                v12i3e19475
                10.2196/19475
                7543980
                33044943
                dbad5615-a94b-4c13-b6e6-5f5b19eba13d
                ©Laura Lapadat, Anusha Balram, Joanna Cheek, Eugenia Canas, Andrea Paquette, Bipolar Youth Action Group, Erin E Michalak. Originally published in Journal of Participatory Medicine (http://jopm.jmir.org), 10.09.2020.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in Journal of Participatory Medicine, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://jopm.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 26 May 2020
                : 20 July 2020
                : 4 August 2020
                : 5 August 2020
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                community-based participatory research,bipolar disorder,adolescent,young adult,youth,participatory research

                Comments

                Comment on this article