32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Guidelines for the management of hereditary colorectal cancer from the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG)/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI)/United Kingdom Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Heritable factors account for approximately 35% of colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, and almost 30% of the population in the UK have a family history of CRC. The quantification of an individual’s lifetime risk of gastrointestinal cancer may incorporate clinical and molecular data, and depends on accurate phenotypic assessment and genetic diagnosis. In turn this may facilitate targeted risk-reducing interventions, including endoscopic surveillance, preventative surgery and chemoprophylaxis, which provide opportunities for cancer prevention. This guideline is an update from the 2010 British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (BSG/ACPGBI) guidelines for colorectal screening and surveillance in moderate and high-risk groups; however, this guideline is concerned specifically with people who have increased lifetime risk of CRC due to hereditary factors, including those with Lynch syndrome, polyposis or a family history of CRC. On this occasion we invited the UK Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG), a subgroup within the British Society of Genetic Medicine (BSGM), as a partner to BSG and ACPGBI in the multidisciplinary guideline development process. We also invited external review through the Delphi process by members of the public as well as the steering committees of the European Hereditary Tumour Group (EHTG) and the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). A systematic review of 10 189 publications was undertaken to develop 67 evidence and expert opinion-based recommendations for the management of hereditary CRC risk. Ten research recommendations are also prioritised to inform clinical management of people at hereditary CRC risk.

          Related collections

          Most cited references257

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cancer risks associated with germline mutations in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 genes in Lynch syndrome.

          Providing accurate estimates of cancer risks is a major challenge in the clinical management of Lynch syndrome. To estimate the age-specific cumulative risks of developing various tumors using a large series of families with mutations of the MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 genes. Families with Lynch syndrome enrolled between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2009, from 40 French cancer genetics clinics participating in the ERISCAM (Estimation des Risques de Cancer chez les porteurs de mutation des gènes MMR) study; 537 families with segregating mutated genes (248 with MLH1; 256 with MSH2; and 33 with MSH6) were analyzed. Age-specific cumulative cancer risks estimated using the genotype restricted likelihood (GRL) method accounting for ascertainment bias. Significant differences in estimated cumulative cancer risk were found between the 3 mutated genes (P = .01). The estimated cumulative risks of colorectal cancer by age 70 years were 41% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 25%-70%) for MLH1 mutation carriers, 48% (95% CI, 30%-77%) for MSH2, and 12% (95% CI, 8%-22%) for MSH6. For endometrial cancer, corresponding risks were 54% (95% CI, 20%-80%), 21% (95% CI, 8%-77%), and 16% (95% CI, 8%-32%). For ovarian cancer, they were 20% (95% CI, 1%-65%), 24% (95% CI, 3%-52%), and 1% (95% CI, 0%-3%). The estimated cumulative risks by age 40 years did not exceed 2% (95% CI, 0%-7%) for endometrial cancer nor 1% (95% CI, 0%-3%) for ovarian cancer, irrespective of the gene. The estimated lifetime risks for other tumor types did not exceed 3% with any of the gene mutations. MSH6 mutations are associated with markedly lower cancer risks than MLH1 or MSH2 mutations. Lifetime ovarian and endometrial cancer risks associated with MLH1 or MSH2 mutations were high but do not increase appreciably until after the age of 40 years.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Screening for the Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer).

            Germ-line mutations in the mismatch-repair genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 lead to the development of the Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer), conferring a strong susceptibility to cancer. We assessed the frequency of such mutations in patients with colorectal cancer and examined strategies for molecular screening to identify patients with the syndrome. Patients with a new diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma at the major hospitals in metropolitan Columbus, Ohio, were eligible for the study. Genotyping of the tumor for microsatellite instability was the primary screening method. Among patients whose screening results were positive for microsatellite instability, we searched for germ-line mutations in the MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 genes with the use of immunohistochemical staining for mismatch-repair proteins, genomic sequencing, and deletion studies. Family members of carriers of the mutations were counseled, and those found to be at risk were offered mutation testing. Of 1066 patients enrolled in the study, 208 (19.5 percent) had microsatellite instability, and 23 of these patients had a mutation causing the Lynch syndrome (2.2 percent). Among the 23 probands with the Lynch syndrome, 10 were more than 50 years of age and 5 did not meet the Amsterdam criteria or the Bethesda guidelines for the diagnosis of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (including the use of age and family history to identify patients at high risk for the Lynch syndrome). Genotyping for microsatellite instability alone and immunohistochemical analysis alone each failed to identify two probands. In the families of 21 of the probands, 117 persons at risk were tested, and of these, 52 had Lynch syndrome mutations and 65 did not. Routine molecular screening of patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma for the Lynch syndrome identified mutations in patients and their family members that otherwise would not have been detected. These data suggest that the effectiveness of screening with immunohistochemical analysis of the mismatch-repair proteins would be similar to that of the more complex strategy of genotyping for microsatellite instability. Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              New clinical criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC, Lynch syndrome) proposed by the International Collaborative group on HNPCC.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Gut
                Gut
                gutjnl
                gut
                Gut
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                0017-5749
                1468-3288
                March 2020
                28 November 2019
                : 69
                : 3
                : 411-444
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentFamily Cancer Clinic , St Mark's Hospital , London, UK
                [2 ] departmentFaculty of Medicine , Imperial College , London, UK
                [3 ] departmentClinical Genetics , West of Scotland Genetics Services , Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
                [4 ] departmentGastroenterology , Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust , Cardiff, UK
                [5 ] departmentClinical Genetics , Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust , London, UK
                [6 ] departmentCCGG , University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh, UK
                [7 ] departmentTranslational Gastroenterology Unit , John Radcliffe Hospital , Oxford, UK
                [8 ] departmentOxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre , University of Oxford , Oxford, UK
                [9 ] departmentFaculty of Medicine & Health Sciences , Nottingham University , Nottingham, UK
                [10 ] departmentHead of Policy and Campaigns , Bowel Cancer UK , London, UK
                [11 ] departmentGenetic Medicine , Central Manchester University Hospitals Foundation Trust , Manchester, UK
                [12 ] departmentPolyposis Registry , St Mark's Hospital , London, UK
                [13 ] departmentGastroenterology , University Hospital of North Tees , Stockton-on-Tees, UK
                [14 ] departmentNorthern Institute for Cancer Research , Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
                [15 ] departmentNuffield Department of Clinical Medicine , Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics , Birmingham, UK
                [16 ] departmentCancer Research Centre , University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Kevin J Monahan, Family Cancer Clinic, St Mark's Hospital, London, HA1 3UJ, UK; k.monahan@ 123456imperial.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7918-4003
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9507-0295
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3037-1470
                Article
                gutjnl-2019-319915
                10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319915
                7034349
                31780574
                dbd90b28-853b-4456-a864-5735d04c0078
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 20 September 2019
                : 25 October 2019
                : 05 November 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: British Society of Gastroenterology;
                Categories
                Guidelines
                1506
                2312
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                colorectal cancer,genetic testing,inherited cancers,surveillance,colorectal surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article