18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      New version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI-CAT): translation, cultural adaptation to Brazil and analyses of psychometric properties

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Background

          The Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory-Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT), developed with innovative measurement methodologies, evaluates functioning of children and youth, from 0 to 21 years, with different health conditions. It is a revision of an earlier instrument (PEDI) that has been used in national and international clinical practice and research. It was felt to be necessary to make this new version (PEDI-CAT) available in Brazil.

          Objectives

          Translate and culturally adapt the PEDI-CAT to the Brazilian-Portuguese language and test its psychometric properties.

          Method

          This methodological study was developed through the following stages: (1) translation, (2) synthesis, (3) back-translation, (4) revision by an expert committee, (5) testing of the pre-final version, and (6) evaluation of the psychometric properties. The 276 translated PEDI-CAT items were divided into three age groups (0-7, 8-14, and 15-21 years).

          Results

          The PEDI-CAT translation followed all six stages. The adaptations incorporated cultural and socioeconomic class specificities. The PEDI-CAT/Brazil showed good indices of inter-examiner (intraclass correlation coefficient-ICC=0.83-0.89) and test-retest (ICC=0.96-0.97) reliability, good internal consistency (0.99) and small standard error of measurement in all three age groups (0.12-0.17). Factor analyses grouped the items from the three functional skills domains into one factor, and items from the responsibility scale into three factors, supporting the adequacy of these factor solutions to the conceptual structure of the instrument and the developmental model.

          Conclusion

          The PEDI-CAT/Brazil is a theoretically consistent, culturally appropriate, and reliable instrument. Its availability in Brazil will contribute to the evaluation and measurement of functional outcomes from clinical interventions, longitudinal follow-up, and rehabilitation research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument

          Background: COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) is an initiative of an international multidisciplinary team of researchers who aim to improve the selection of outcome measurement instruments both in research and in clinical practice by developing tools for selecting the most appropriate available instrument. Method: In this paper these tools are described, i.e. the COSMIN taxonomy and definition of measurement properties; the COSMIN checklist to evaluate the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties; a search filter for finding studies on measurement properties; a protocol for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments; a database of systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments; and a guideline for selecting outcome measurement instruments for Core Outcome Sets in clinical trials. Currently, we are updating the COSMIN checklist, particularly the standards for content validity studies. Also new standards for studies using Item Response Theory methods will be developed. Additionally, in the future we want to develop standards for studies on the quality of non-patient reported outcome measures, such as clinician-reported outcomes and performance-based outcomes. Conclusions: In summary, we plea for more standardization in the use of outcome measurement instruments, for conducting high quality systematic reviews on measurement instruments in which the best available outcome measurement instrument is recommended, and for stopping the use of poor outcome measurement instruments.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            International classification of functioning, disability & health

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              How to assess the reliability of measurements in rehabilitation.

              To evaluate the effects of rehabilitation interventions, we need reliable measurements. The measurements should also be sufficiently sensitive to enable the detection of clinically important changes. In recent years, the assessment of reliability in clinical practice and medical research has developed from the use of correlation coefficients to a comprehensive set of statistical methods. In this review, we present methods that can be used to assess reliability and describe how data from reliability analyses can aid the interpretation of results from rehabilitation interventions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Braz J Phys Ther
                Braz J Phys Ther
                rbfis
                Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
                Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia
                1413-3555
                1809-9246
                16 June 2016
                Nov-Dec 2016
                : 20
                : 6
                : 561-570
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Reabilitação, Escola de Educação Física, Fisioterapia e Terapia Ocupacional, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
                [2 ]Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences: Sargent College, Boston University, Boston, USA
                [3 ]Departamento de Terapia Ocupacional de Lagarto, Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS), Lagarto, SE, Brazil
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence Marisa C. Mancini Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Escola de Educação Física, Fisioterapia e Terapia Ocupacional Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Reabilitação Avenida Antônio Carlos, 6627, Pampulha CEP 31270-010, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil e-mail: mcmancini@ 123456ufmg.br , marisacmancini@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                S1413-35552016005008105
                10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0166
                5176194
                27333475
                dbdb9be7-0518-44db-a578-6331d60d6ddf

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 25 November 2015
                : 08 February 2016
                : 23 February 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 5, Equations: 0, References: 32, Pages: 10
                Categories
                Original Articles

                assessment,functioning,translation, cultural adaptation,psychometric properties,rehabilitation

                Comments

                Comment on this article