6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Drogas y consumo de alto riesgo: patrón epidemiológico a partir de análisis de cabello en el contexto forense Translated title: High-risk drug use: epidemiological pattern through hair testing in the forensic context

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          RESUMEN Fundamentos: Las encuestas epidemiológicas son las fuentes básicas de información sobre el consumo de drogas, aunque presentan algunas limitaciones en este campo: sus resultados pueden verse condicionados por la falta de veracidad de las respuestas y el método de muestreo dificulta la detección de comportamientos de baja prevalencia en las poblaciones diana. El objetivo de esta investigación fue establecer el patrón epidemiológico del consumo de drogas en la población sometida a análisis de drogas en cabello en el marco de investigaciones judiciales, con el fin de aportar una fuente de información adicional al conocimiento del consumo de drogas de alto riesgo. Sujetos y métodos: Se realizó un estudio transversal de consumo de drogas en la población sometida a análisis de drogas en cabello en el contexto forense (N=5.292). Se obtuvo la prevalencia de consumo de cannabis, cocaína, heroína, ketamina, anfetamina (AP), metanfetamina (MA), 3,4-metilendioxi-metanfetamina (MDMA), 3,4-metilendioxianfetamina (MDA), 3,4-metilendioxi-N-etilamphetamina (MDEA) y metadona. Se analizó la asociación entre el consumo de drogas y los factores demográficos, así como de sus tendencias, mediante la prueba de Chi-cuadrado de Pearson. Se obtuvo la distribución de frecuencias de las concentraciones de drogas en cabello y se evaluó en relación con el sexo y la edad, utilizando los métodos no paramétricos U de Mann-Whitney y H de Kruskal-Wallis. Resultados: En el periodo 2013-2015, la prevalencia de consumo de cocaína fue particularmente elevada (49%) en la población estudiada, próxima a la de cannabis (54%). Las tasas de consumo de heroína, metadona, MDMA y anfetamina resultaron entre un 10% y un 18%. Durante el período estudiado, se registró un aumento significativo del consumo de MDMA, heroína y anfetamina, así como una disminución significativa del consumo de metadona. Conclusiones: Cannabis y cocaína son las drogas de abuso más frecuentes entre la población sometida a análisis de drogas en cabello en el marco de investigaciones judiciales en el periodo estudiado, si bien las proporciones de consumidores de heroína, MDMA y anfetamina muestran una tendencia creciente. Los patrones de consumo varían en función de la edad y del sexo, observándose disminución del consumo de cannabis y MDMA e incremento del consumo de heroína y metadona al aumentar la edad. El consumo de cannabis, cocaína y MDMA resulta más prevalente en hombres y el de metadona en mujeres.

          Translated abstract

          ABSTRACT Background: The basic sources of information on drug use are epidemiological surveys, although they have some limitations: their results may be conditioned by the lack of veracity of the responses and the sampling method makes it difficult to detect low-prevalence behaviours in target populations. This study aimed to establish the epidemiological pattern of drug use in the population undergoing drug testing in hair, in the framework of judicial investigations, in order to provide an additional approach to the knowledge of high-risk drug use. Methods: A cross-sectional study on drug use was conducted on the population subjected to drug testing in hair (N=5,292) in the forensic context. Prevalence of cannabis, cocaine, heroin, ketamine, amphetamine (AP), methamphetamine (MA), 3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA), 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), 3,4-methylenedioxy-N-ethylamphetamine (MDEA) and methadone uses were obtained. Association between drug use and demographics, and trends of prevalence over the period were analysed using the Pearson Chi-square test. Frequency distribution of drug concentrations in hair was obtained and it was assessed in relation to gender and age using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis H methods. Results: During the period 2013-2015, prevalence of cocaine use was particularly high (49%), rating second among the population studied, after cannabis use (54%). Proportions of heroin, methadone, MDMA and amphetamine use ranged from 10% to 18%. There was a significant increase in prevalence of MDMA, heroin and amphetamine use during the period 2013-2015, as well as a significant decrease in methadone use. The rates of cannabis, cocaine and MDMA use were higher in men, whereas methadone use was higher among women. Conclusions: Cannabis and cocaine are the most frequently abused drugs among the population undergoing drug testing in hair in the framework of judicial investigations over the three-year period, although the proportions of heroin, MDMA and amphetamine users show an increasing trend. Drug use patterns vary according to age and sex, with a decrease in cannabis and MDMA use and an increase in heroin and methadone use as age increased; cannabis, cocaine and MDMA use are more prevalent among men and methadone use among women.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The utility of drug testing in epidemiological research: results from a general population survey.

          To assess the utility of biological testing in a general population survey for estimating prevalence and evaluating self-report data quality. An audio computer-assisted interview was administered to subjects from June 2001 to January 2002. Immediately following the interview, subjects were requested to participate in hair, oral fluid and urine testing. Subjects were from randomly selected households in the City of Chicago using multi-stage sampling methods. Interviews were conducted in subjects' homes. The data represent 627 randomly selected adult participants, ages 18-40 years. Prevalance, kappa, conditioned kappa, sensitivity, specificity, under-reporting, 'mixed model' and logistic regression. Higher rates of marijuana use were generated from survey reports than from drug testing. Drug testing generated higher prevalence rates than survey reports for recent use of cocaine and heroin. Under-reporting of recent drug use was apparent for all three substances. Sensitivity was particularly low for cocaine and heroin. Race was related to under-reporting, with African Americans less likely to report marijuana use despite a positive test result. The utility of drug testing for surveys depends on the type of substance examined as well as on the type of test employed. Multiple tests have more utility than a single test. Drug testing is useful for identifying the levels and sources of under-reporting in a survey and provides a basis for adjusting prevalence estimates based on self-reports.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comparison between self-report and hair analysis of illicit drug use in a community sample of middle-aged men.

            Discrepancies between biological assays and self-report of illicit drug use could undermine epidemiological research findings. Two objectives of the present study are to examine the degree of agreement between self-reported illicit drug use and hair analysis in a community sample of middle-aged men, and to identify factors that may predict discrepancies between self-report and hair testing. Male participants followed since 1972 were interviewed about substance use, and hair samples were analyzed for marijuana, cocaine, opiates, phencyclidine (PCP) and methamphetamine using radioimmunoassay and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) techniques. Self-report and hair testing generally met good, but not excellent, agreement. Apparent underreporting of recent cocaine use was associated with inpatient hospitalization for the participant's most recent quit attempt, younger age, identifying as African American or other, and not having a diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder. The overestimate of marijuana use relative to hair test was associated with frequent use since 1972 and providing an inadequate hair sample. Additional research is needed to identify factors that differentially affect the validity of both hair drug testing and self-report.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Results of hair analyses for drugs of abuse and comparison with self-reports and urine tests.

              Urine as well as head and pubic hair samples from drug abusers were analysed for opiates, cocaine and its metabolites, amphetamines, methadone and cannabinoids. Urine immunoassay results and the results of hair tests by means of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry were compared to the self-reported data of the patients in an interview protocol. With regard to the study group, opiate abuse was claimed from the majority in self-reports (89%), followed by cannabinoids (55%), cocaine (38%), and methadone (32%). Except for opiates the comparison between self-reported drug use and urinalysis at admission showed a low correlation. In contrast to urinalysis, hair tests revealed consumption in more cases. There was also a good agreement between self-reports of patients taking part in an official methadone maintenance program and urine test results concerning methadone. However, hair test results demonstrated that methadone abuse in general was under-reported by people who did not participate in a substitution program. Comparing self-reports and the results of hair analyses drug use was dramatically under-reported, especially cocaine. Cocaine hair tests appeared to be highly sensitive and specific in identifying past cocaine use even in settings of negative urine tests. In contrast to cocaine, hair lacks sensitivity as a detection agent for cannabinoids and a proof of cannabis use by means of hair analysis should include the sensitive detection of the metabolite THC carboxylic acid in the lower picogram range.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                resp
                Revista Española de Salud Pública
                Rev. Esp. Salud Publica
                Ministerio de Sanidad, Consumo y Bienestar social (Madrid, Madrid, Spain )
                1135-5727
                2173-9110
                2019
                : 93
                : e201911065
                Affiliations
                [1] Madrid orgnameInstituto Nacional de Toxicología y Ciencias Forenses orgdiv1Departamento de Madrid Spain
                [3] Salamanca Castilla y León orgnameUniversidad de Salamanca orgdiv1Facultad de Farmacia, Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública Spain
                [2] Salamanca Castilla y León orgnameUniversidad de Salamanca orgdiv1Facultad de Farmacia, Química Farmacéutica Spain
                Article
                S1135-57272019000100443 S1135-5727(19)09300000443
                dbdc2bff-9162-47bd-8bfc-3ed61a3be351

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 International License.

                History
                : 17 May 2019
                : 11 March 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 30, Pages: 0
                Product

                SciELO Public Health

                Categories
                Originales

                Epidemiología,Epidemiology,Consumo de drogas,Hair testing,Drug use,Drug testing,Análisis de drogas,Análisis de cabello

                Comments

                Comment on this article