22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A mathematical model of exposure of non-target Lepidoptera to Bt-maize pollen expressing Cry1Ab within Europe

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Genetically modified (GM) maize MON810 expresses a Cry1Ab insecticidal protein, derived from Bacillus thuringiensis ( Bt), toxic to lepidopteran target pests such as Ostrinia nubilalis. An environmental risk to non-target Lepidoptera from this GM crop is exposure to harmful amounts of Bt-containing pollen deposited on host plants in or near MON810 fields. An 11-parameter mathematical model analysed exposure of larvae of three non-target species: the butterflies Inachis io (L.), Vanessa atalanta (L.) and moth Plutella xylostella (L.), in 11 representative maize cultivation regions in four European countries. A mortality–dose relationship was integrated with a dose–distance relationship to estimate mortality both within the maize MON810 crop and within the field margin at varying distances from the crop edge. Mortality estimates were adjusted to allow for physical effects; the lack of temporal coincidence between the susceptible larval stage concerned and the period over which maize MON810 pollen is shed; and seven further parameters concerned with maize agronomy and host-plant ecology. Sublethal effects were estimated and allowance made for aggregated pollen deposition. Estimated environmental impact was low: in all regions, the calculated mortality rate for worst-case scenarios was less than one individual in every 1572 for the butterflies and one in 392 for the moth.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Signaling versus punching hole: How do Bacillus thuringiensis toxins kill insect midgut cells?

          Cry proteins, produced by Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), are widely used for the control of insect pests in agriculture as spray products or expressed in transgenic crops, such as maize and cotton. Little was known regarding the mechanism of action of these toxins when the first commercial Bt product was introduced fifty years ago. However, research on the mechanism of action over the last two decades has enhanced our knowledge of toxin interaction with membrane receptors and their effects in insect midgut cells. All this information allowed for the rational design of improved toxins with higher toxicity or toxins that overcome insect resistance, which could compromise Bt use and effectiveness in the field. In this review we discuss and evaluate the different models of the mode of action of Cry toxins, including a discussion about the role of various receptors in toxin action.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            More than one way to go.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Absence of toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis pollen to black swallowtails under field conditions.

              A single laboratory study on monarch butterflies has prompted widespread concern that corn pollen, engineered to express Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) endotoxin, might travel beyond corn fields and cause mortality in nontarget lepidopterans. Among the lepidopterans at high potential risk from this technology is the black swallowtail butterfly, Papilio polyxenes, whose host plants in the midwestern U. S. are located principally in narrow strips between roads and crop fields. A field study was performed to assess whether mortality of early instar black swallowtails was associated either with proximity to a field of Bt corn or by levels of Bt pollen deposition on host plants. Potted host plants were infested with first instar black swallowtails and placed at intervals from the edge of a field of Bt corn (Pioneer 34R07 containing Monsanto event 810) at the beginning of anthesis. We confirmed by ELISA that pollen from these plants contained Cry1Ab endotoxin (2.125 +/- 0.289 ng/g). Although many of the larvae died during the 7 days that the experiments were run, there was no relationship between mortality and proximity to the field or pollen deposition on host plants. Moreover, pollen from these same plants failed to cause mortality in the laboratory at the highest pollen dose tested (10,000 grains/cm(2)), a level that far exceeded the highest pollen density observed in the field (200 grains/cm(2)). We conclude that Bt pollen of the variety tested is unlikely to affect wild populations of black swallowtails. Thus, our results suggest that at least some potential nontarget effects of the use of transgenic plants may be manageable.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Biol Sci
                RSPB
                royprsb
                Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
                The Royal Society
                0962-8452
                1471-2954
                7 May 2010
                6 January 2010
                6 January 2010
                : 277
                : 1686
                : 1417-1425
                Affiliations
                [1 ]simpleOaklands Barn, Lug's Lane, Broome , Norfolk NR35 2HT, UK
                [2 ]European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), GMO Unit, Largo Natale Palli 5/A, 43121 Parma, Italy
                [3 ]National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Environment (ENEA), simpleResearch Centre Trisaia , 75026 Rotondella, Italy
                [4 ]Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, Mauerstrasse 39-42, 10117 Berlin, Germany
                [5 ]simpleCentre for Ecology and Hydrology , Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SR, UK
                [6 ]simplePlant Protection Institute, Szent István University , Pater K. 1, 2100 Gödöllő, Hungary
                [7 ]Animal Biology Department, simpleUniversity of Palermo , Via Archirafi, 18, 90123 Palermo, Italy
                [8 ]simpleBüro für Landschaftsökologie und Umweltstudien , Wiesenstraße 8, 37073 Göttingen, Germany
                [9 ]Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas (CSIC), Departamento de Biología de Plantas, Laboratorio Interacción Planta-Insecto, C/Ramiro de Maeztu 9, 28040 Madrid, Spain
                [10 ]Julius Kühn Institute, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (JKI), simpleInstitute for Biosafety of Genetically Modified Plants , Erwin-Baur-Strasse 27, 06484 Quedlinburg, Germany
                [11 ]Sweet Environmental Consultants, 6 The Green, Willingham, Cambridge CB24 5JA, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Author for correspondence ( joe.perry@ 123456bbsrc.ac.uk ).
                Article
                rspb20092091
                10.1098/rspb.2009.2091
                2871945
                20053648
                dbf54129-fbac-429a-875c-e502db6e16ab
                © 2010 The Royal Society

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 17 November 2009
                : 9 December 2009
                Categories
                1001
                31
                60
                Research articles

                Life sciences
                cry1ab,mathematical model,risk assessment,genetically modified maize,non-target lepidoptera,exposure

                Comments

                Comment on this article