12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Computational Prediction and Validation of Tumor-Associated Neoantigens

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Tumor progression is typically accompanied by an accumulation of driver and passenger somatic mutations. A handful of those mutations occur in protein coding genes which introduce non-synonymous polymorphisms. Certain substitutions may give rise to novel, tumor-associated antigens or neoantigens, presentable by cancer cells to the host adaptive immune system. As antigen recognition is the core of an effective immune response, the identification of patient tumor specific antigens derived from transformed cells is of importance for immunotherapeutic approaches. Recent technological advances in DNA sequencing of tumor genomes, advances in gene expression analysis, algorithm development for antigen predictions and methods for T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire sequencing have facilitated the selection of candidate immunogenic neoantigens. In this regard, multiple research groups have reported encouraging results of neoantigen-based cancer vaccines that generate tumor antigen specific immune responses, both in mouse models and clinical trials. Additionally, both the quantity and quality of neoantigens has been shown to have predictive value for clinical outcomes in checkpoint-blockade immunotherapy in certain tumor types. Neoantigen recognition by vaccination or through adoptive T cell therapy may have unprecedented potential to advance cancer immunotherapy in combination with other approaches. In our review we discuss three parameters regarding neoantigens: computational methods for epitope prediction, experimental methods for epitope immunogenicity validation and future directions for improvement of those methods. Within each section, we will describe the advantages and limitations of existing methods as well as highlight pressing fundamental problems to be addressed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references99

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          PD-1 Blockade in Tumors with Mismatch-Repair Deficiency.

          Somatic mutations have the potential to encode "non-self" immunogenic antigens. We hypothesized that tumors with a large number of somatic mutations due to mismatch-repair defects may be susceptible to immune checkpoint blockade.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            Pan-cancer Immunogenomic Analyses Reveal Genotype-Immunophenotype Relationships and Predictors of Response to Checkpoint Blockade.

            The Cancer Genome Atlas revealed the genomic landscapes of human cancers. In parallel, immunotherapy is transforming the treatment of advanced cancers. Unfortunately, the majority of patients do not respond to immunotherapy, making the identification of predictive markers and the mechanisms of resistance an area of intense research. To increase our understanding of tumor-immune cell interactions, we characterized the intratumoral immune landscapes and the cancer antigenomes from 20 solid cancers and created The Cancer Immunome Atlas (https://tcia.at/). Cellular characterization of the immune infiltrates showed that tumor genotypes determine immunophenotypes and tumor escape mechanisms. Using machine learning, we identified determinants of tumor immunogenicity and developed a scoring scheme for the quantification termed immunophenoscore. The immunophenoscore was a superior predictor of response to anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) antibodies in two independent validation cohorts. Our findings and this resource may help inform cancer immunotherapy and facilitate the development of precision immuno-oncology.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma

              An improvement in overall survival among patients with metastatic melanoma has been an elusive goal. In this phase 3 study, ipilimumab--which blocks cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 to potentiate an antitumor T-cell response--administered with or without a glycoprotein 100 (gp100) peptide vaccine was compared with gp100 alone in patients with previously treated metastatic melanoma. A total of 676 HLA-A*0201-positive patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma, whose disease had progressed while they were receiving therapy for metastatic disease, were randomly assigned, in a 3:1:1 ratio, to receive ipilimumab plus gp100 (403 patients), ipilimumab alone (137), or gp100 alone (136). Ipilimumab, at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight, was administered with or without gp100 every 3 weeks for up to four treatments (induction). Eligible patients could receive reinduction therapy. The primary end point was overall survival. The median overall survival was 10.0 months among patients receiving ipilimumab plus gp100, as compared with 6.4 months among patients receiving gp100 alone (hazard ratio for death, 0.68; P<0.001). The median overall survival with ipilimumab alone was 10.1 months (hazard ratio for death in the comparison with gp100 alone, 0.66; P=0.003). No difference in overall survival was detected between the ipilimumab groups (hazard ratio with ipilimumab plus gp100, 1.04; P=0.76). Grade 3 or 4 immune-related adverse events occurred in 10 to 15% of patients treated with ipilimumab and in 3% treated with gp100 alone. There were 14 deaths related to the study drugs (2.1%), and 7 were associated with immune-related adverse events. Ipilimumab, with or without a gp100 peptide vaccine, as compared with gp100 alone, improved overall survival in patients with previously treated metastatic melanoma. Adverse events can be severe, long-lasting, or both, but most are reversible with appropriate treatment. (Funded by Medarex and Bristol-Myers Squibb; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00094653.)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Immunol
                Front Immunol
                Front. Immunol.
                Frontiers in Immunology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-3224
                24 January 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 27
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital , New York, NY, United States
                [2] 2Center for Computational Immunology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital , New York, NY, United States
                [3] 3Department of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital , New York, NY, United States
                [4] 4Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital , New York, NY, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Peter Brossart, University of Bonn, Germany

                Reviewed by: Zsolt Sebestyen, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands; Juliane Sarah Walz, Tübingen University Hospital, Germany

                *Correspondence: Nina Bhardwaj nina.bhardwaj@ 123456mssm.edu

                This article was submitted to Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology

                Article
                10.3389/fimmu.2020.00027
                7025577
                32117226
                dbfb4c7b-e69b-4ab3-8285-c1bfa829b644
                Copyright © 2020 Roudko, Greenbaum and Bhardwaj.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 23 August 2019
                : 08 January 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 158, Pages: 11, Words: 8953
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002
                Award ID: R01CA201189
                Award ID: R01CA180913
                Award ID: R01AI081848
                Award ID: 7R01AI081848-04
                Award ID: 1P30CA196521-01
                Funded by: National Science Foundation 10.13039/100000001
                Award ID: NSF 1545935
                Categories
                Immunology
                Review

                Immunology
                neoantigen,tcr,wes,hla-allele,mhc-i epitope
                Immunology
                neoantigen, tcr, wes, hla-allele, mhc-i epitope

                Comments

                Comment on this article