14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Isolation and characterization of different promising fungi for biological waste management of polyurethanes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          As a highly resistant polymer family, polyurethanes ( PU) are responsible for increasing environmental issues. Then, PU biodegradation is a challenging way to develop sustainable waste management processes based on biological recycling. Since the metabolic diversity of fungi is a major asset for polymer degradation, nearly thirty strains were isolated from sampling on six different PU wastes‐containing environments. A screening of the fungi on four thermoplastic PU ( TPU) with different macromolecular architectures led to the selection of three strains able to use two polyester PU as sole carbon source: Alternaria sp., Penicillium section Lanata‐Divaricata and Aspergillus section flavi. Weight loss, FTIR, Scanning Electron Microscopy and Size Exclusion Chromatography analyses revealed that these three fungi degrade slightly and similarly a fatty acid dimer‐based TPU while variability of degradation was noticed on a polycaprolactone‐based TPU. On this last TPU, robust analysis of the degraded polymers showed that the Penicillium strain was the best degrading microorganism. Membrane enzymes seemed to be involved in this degradation. It is the first time that a strain of Penicillium of the section Lanata‐Divaricata displaying PU biodegradation ability is isolated. These newly discovered fungi are promising for the development of polyester PU waste management process.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Polymer biodegradation: mechanisms and estimation techniques.

          Within the frame of the sustainable development, new materials are being conceived in order to increase their biodegradability properties. Biodegradation is considered to take place throughout three stages: biodeterioration, biofragmentation and assimilation, without neglect the participation of abiotic factors. However, most of the techniques used by researchers in this area are inadequate to provide evidence of the final stage: assimilation. In this review, we describe the different stages of biodegradation and we state several techniques used by some authors working in this domain. Validate assimilation (including mineralisation) is an important aspect to guarantee the real biodegradability of items of consumption (in particular friendly environmental new materials). The aim of this review is to emphasise the importance of measure as well as possible, the last stage of the biodegradation, in order to certify the integration of new materials into the biogeochemical cycles. Finally, we give a perspective to use the natural labelling of stable isotopes in the environment, by means of a new methodology based on the isotopic fractionation to validate assimilation by microorganisms.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Identification and nomenclature of the genus Penicillium

            Penicillium is a diverse genus occurring worldwide and its species play important roles as decomposers of organic materials and cause destructive rots in the food industry where they produce a wide range of mycotoxins. Other species are considered enzyme factories or are common indoor air allergens. Although DNA sequences are essential for robust identification of Penicillium species, there is currently no comprehensive, verified reference database for the genus. To coincide with the move to one fungus one name in the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi and plants, the generic concept of Penicillium was re-defined to accommodate species from other genera, such as Chromocleista, Eladia, Eupenicillium, Torulomyces and Thysanophora, which together comprise a large monophyletic clade. As a result of this, and the many new species described in recent years, it was necessary to update the list of accepted species in Penicillium. The genus currently contains 354 accepted species, including new combinations for Aspergillus crystallinus, A. malodoratus and A. paradoxus, which belong to Penicillium section Paradoxa. To add to the taxonomic value of the list, we also provide information on each accepted species MycoBank number, living ex-type strains and provide GenBank accession numbers to ITS, β-tubulin, calmodulin and RPB2 sequences, thereby supplying a verified set of sequences for each species of the genus. In addition to the nomenclatural list, we recommend a standard working method for species descriptions and identifications to be adopted by laboratories working on this genus.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Bioremediation techniques–classification based on site of application: principles, advantages, limitations and prospects

              Environmental pollution has been on the rise in the past few decades owing to increased human activities on energy reservoirs, unsafe agricultural practices and rapid industrialization. Amongst the pollutants that are of environmental and public health concerns due to their toxicities are: heavy metals, nuclear wastes, pesticides, green house gases, and hydrocarbons. Remediation of polluted sites using microbial process (bioremediation) has proven effective and reliable due to its eco-friendly features. Bioremediation can either be carried out ex situ or in situ, depending on several factors, which include but not limited to cost, site characteristics, type and concentration of pollutants. Generally, ex situ techniques apparently are more expensive compared to in situ techniques as a result of additional cost attributable to excavation. However, cost of on-site installation of equipment, and inability to effectively visualize and control the subsurface of polluted sites are of major concerns when carrying out in situ bioremediation. Therefore, choosing appropriate bioremediation technique, which will effectively reduce pollutant concentrations to an innocuous state, is crucial for a successful bioremediation project. Furthermore, the two major approaches to enhance bioremediation are biostimulation and bioaugmentation provided that environmental factors, which determine the success of bioremediation, are maintained at optimal range. This review provides more insight into the two major bioremediation techniques, their principles, advantages, limitations and prospects.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                luc.averous@unistra.fr
                Journal
                Microb Biotechnol
                Microb Biotechnol
                10.1111/(ISSN)1751-7915
                MBT2
                Microbial Biotechnology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1751-7915
                27 December 2018
                May 2019
                : 12
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1111/mbt2.2019.12.issue-3 )
                : 544-555
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] BioTeam/ICPEES‐ECPM UMR CNRS 7515 Université de Strasbourg 25 rue Becquerel 67087 Strasbourg Cedex 2 France
                [ 2 ] Soprema 14 rue de Saint‐Nazaire 67025 Strasbourg Cedex 1 France
                [ 3 ] Univ. Lille, INRA, ISA, Univ. Artois, Univ. Littoral Côte d'Opale EA 7394 – ICV – Institut Charles Viollette 59000 Lille France
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]For correspondence. E‐mail luc.averous@ 123456unistra.fr ; Tel. + 33 (0)3 68 85 27 84; Fax + 33 (0)3 68 85 27 84.
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2797-226X
                Article
                MBT213346
                10.1111/1751-7915.13346
                6465239
                30592151
                dc08a904-8cb5-4e16-8470-29d60290fc72
                © 2018 The Authors. Microbial Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for Applied Microbiology.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 26 July 2018
                : 10 October 2018
                : 10 November 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 2, Pages: 12, Words: 7388
                Funding
                Funded by: Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
                Award ID: 633962
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                mbt213346
                May 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.6.2.1 mode:remove_FC converted:15.04.2019

                Biotechnology
                Biotechnology

                Comments

                Comment on this article