34
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Clinically Meaningful Improvement After Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

      research-article
      , MD * , , , BS , , MD , , MD, PhD , , MD , , MD , , MD, MBA , HSS ACL Registry Group § , , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, PhD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, MS, , MD
      Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
      SAGE Publications
      anterior cruciate ligament, reconstruction; machine learning, artificial intelligence, clinically meaningful, MCID, IKDC

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Understanding specific risk profiles for each patient and their propensity to experience clinically meaningful improvement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is important for preoperative patient counseling and management of expectations.

          Purpose:

          To develop machine learning algorithms to predict achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score at a minimum 2-year follow-up after ACLR.

          Study Design:

          Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

          Methods:

          An ACLR registry of patients from 27 fellowship-trained sports medicine surgeons at a large academic institution was retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-six variables were tested for predictive value. The study population was randomly partitioned into training and independent testing sets using a 70:30 split. Six machine learning algorithms (stochastic gradient boosting, random forest, neural network, support vector machine, adaptive gradient boosting, and elastic-net penalized logistic regression [ENPLR]) were trained using 10-fold cross-validation 3 times and internally validated on the independent set of patients. Algorithm performance was assessed using discrimination, calibration, Brier score, and decision-curve analysis.

          Results:

          A total of 442 patients, of whom 39 (8.8%) did not achieve the MCID, were included. The 5 most predictive features of achieving the MCID were body mass index ≤27.4, grade 0 medial collateral ligament examination (compared with other grades), intratunnel femoral tunnel fixation (compared with suspensory), no history of previous contralateral knee surgery, and achieving full knee extension preoperatively. The ENPLR algorithm had the best relative performance (C-statistic, 0.82; calibration intercept, 0.10; calibration slope, 1.15; Brier score, 0.068), demonstrating excellent predictive ability in the study’s data set.

          Conclusion:

          Machine learning, specifically the ENPLR algorithm, demonstrated good performance for predicting a patient’s propensity to achieve the MCID for the IKDC score after ACLR based on preoperative and intraoperative factors. The femoral tunnel fixation method was the only significant intraoperative variable. Range of motion and medial collateral ligament integrity were found to be important physical examination parameters. Increased body mass index and prior contralateral surgery were also significantly predictive of outcome.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures.

          The performance of prediction models can be assessed using a variety of methods and metrics. Traditional measures for binary and survival outcomes include the Brier score to indicate overall model performance, the concordance (or c) statistic for discriminative ability (or area under the receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve), and goodness-of-fit statistics for calibration.Several new measures have recently been proposed that can be seen as refinements of discrimination measures, including variants of the c statistic for survival, reclassification tables, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). Moreover, decision-analytic measures have been proposed, including decision curves to plot the net benefit achieved by making decisions based on model predictions.We aimed to define the role of these relatively novel approaches in the evaluation of the performance of prediction models. For illustration, we present a case study of predicting the presence of residual tumor versus benign tissue in patients with testicular cancer (n = 544 for model development, n = 273 for external validation).We suggest that reporting discrimination and calibration will always be important for a prediction model. Decision-analytic measures should be reported if the predictive model is to be used for clinical decisions. Other measures of performance may be warranted in specific applications, such as reclassification metrics to gain insight into the value of adding a novel predictor to an established model.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Towards better clinical prediction models: seven steps for development and an ABCD for validation.

            Clinical prediction models provide risk estimates for the presence of disease (diagnosis) or an event in the future course of disease (prognosis) for individual patients. Although publications that present and evaluate such models are becoming more frequent, the methodology is often suboptimal. We propose that seven steps should be considered in developing prediction models: (i) consideration of the research question and initial data inspection; (ii) coding of predictors; (iii) model specification; (iv) model estimation; (v) evaluation of model performance; (vi) internal validation; and (vii) model presentation. The validity of a prediction model is ideally assessed in fully independent data, where we propose four key measures to evaluate model performance: calibration-in-the-large, or the model intercept (A); calibration slope (B); discrimination, with a concordance statistic (C); and clinical usefulness, with decision-curve analysis (D). As an application, we develop and validate prediction models for 30-day mortality in patients with an acute myocardial infarction. This illustrates the usefulness of the proposed framework to strengthen the methodological rigour and quality for prediction models in cardiovascular research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              VERIFICATION OF FORECASTS EXPRESSED IN TERMS OF PROBABILITY

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Orthop J Sports Med
                Orthop J Sports Med
                OJS
                spojs
                Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                2325-9671
                14 October 2021
                October 2021
                : 9
                : 10
                : 23259671211046575
                Affiliations
                []Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
                []University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
                [§ ]All authors are listed in the Authors section at the end of this article.
                [4-23259671211046575] Investigation performed at the Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Kyle N. Kunze, MD, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th Street, New York, NY, USA (email: Kylekunze7@ 123456gmail.com ).
                Article
                10.1177_23259671211046575
                10.1177/23259671211046575
                8521431
                34671691
                dc948092-2262-4ba0-bb55-d95a1d265f7d
                © The Author(s) 2021

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 7 May 2021
                : 23 June 2021
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                ts3

                anterior cruciate ligament,reconstruction; machine learning,artificial intelligence,clinically meaningful,mcid,ikdc

                Comments

                Comment on this article